TY - JOUR
T1 - 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Takayasu Arteritis
AU - for the DCVAS Study Group
AU - Grayson, Peter C.
AU - Ponte, Cristina
AU - Suppiah, Ravi
AU - Robson, Joanna C.
AU - Gribbons, Katherine Bates
AU - Judge, Andrew
AU - Craven, Anthea
AU - Khalid, Sara
AU - Hutchings, Andrew
AU - Danda, Debashish
AU - Luqmani, Raashid A.
AU - Watts, Richard A.
AU - Merkel, Peter A.
AU - Gatenby, Paul
AU - Hill, Catherine
AU - Ranganathan, Dwarakanathan
AU - Kronbichler, Andreas
AU - Blockmans, Daniel
AU - Barra, Lillian
AU - Carette, Simon
AU - Pagnoux, Christian
AU - Dhindsa, Navjot
AU - Fifi-Mah, Aurore
AU - Khalidi, Nader
AU - Liang, Patrick
AU - Milman, Nataliya
AU - Pineau, Christian
AU - Tian, Xinping
AU - Wang, Guochun
AU - Wang, Tian
AU - Zhao, Ming hui
AU - Tesar, Vladimir
AU - Baslund, Bo
AU - Hammam, Nevin
AU - Shahin, Amira
AU - Pirila, Laura
AU - Putaala, Jukka
AU - Hellmich, Bernhard
AU - Henes, Jörg
AU - Holle, Julia
AU - Lamprecht, Peter
AU - Moosig, Frank
AU - Neumann, Thomas
AU - Schmidt, Wolfgang
AU - Sunderkoettey, Cord
AU - Szekanecz, Zoltan
AU - Danda, Debashish
AU - Das, Siddharth
AU - Gupta, Rajiva
AU - Hirahashi, Junichi
N1 - Funding Information:
The Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis (DCVAS) study, which included the development of this classification criteria, was funded by grants from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), EULAR, the Vasculitis Foundation, and the University of Pennsylvania Vasculitis Center. This study was also supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Objective: To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set. Results: The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large-vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94–0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6–97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7–100.0%). Conclusion: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research.
AB - Objective: To develop and validate new classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Methods: Patients with vasculitis or comparator diseases were recruited into an international cohort. The study proceeded in 6 phases: 1) identification of candidate criteria items, 2) collection of candidate items present at diagnosis, 3) expert panel review of cases, 4) data-driven reduction of candidate items, 5) derivation of a points-based classification score in a development data set, and 6) validation in an independent data set. Results: The development data set consisted of 316 cases of TAK and 323 comparators. The validation data set consisted of an additional 146 cases of TAK and 127 comparators. Age ≤60 years at diagnosis and imaging evidence of large-vessel vasculitis were absolute requirements to classify a patient as having TAK. The final criteria items and weights were as follows: female sex (+1), angina (+2), limb claudication (+2), arterial bruit (+2), reduced upper extremity pulse (+2), reduced pulse or tenderness of a carotid artery (+2), blood pressure difference between arms of ≥20 mm Hg (+1), number of affected arterial territories (+1 to +3), paired artery involvement (+1), and abdominal aorta plus renal or mesenteric involvement (+3). A patient could be classified as having TAK with a cumulative score of ≥5 points. When these criteria were tested in the validation data set, the model area under the curve was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94–0.99) with a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% CI 88.6–97.1%) and specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 96.7–100.0%). Conclusion: The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TAK are now validated for use in research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141659320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141659320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/art.42324
DO - 10.1002/art.42324
M3 - Article
C2 - 36349501
AN - SCOPUS:85141659320
SN - 2326-5191
VL - 74
SP - 1872
EP - 1880
JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology
JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology
IS - 12
ER -