A comparative study on the two efl teaching methods: —The communicative and the grammatical approach—

Jyukou Andou, Nobuyoshi Fukunaga, Junko Kurahachi, Takeshi Suto, Takashi Nakano, Masaharu Kage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present study two EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teaching methods were compared: the communicative approach (CA) and the grammatical approach (GA). In the CA, grammar was not directly taught or explained. On the other hand, in the GA, grammar was directly taught and frequently supplemented by some explanations in Japanese. The purpose of this study was to clarify how much differently these teaching approaches might affect students’ acquirement of linguistic skills. Ninety fifth-graders were divided into two of the above mentioned instructional conditions. For each method there were 4 classes, each one taught by a different teacher. The total teaching time was 20 hours. Data for one class were not included in the final analysis due to experimental contamination. The results indicated that (1) GA students performed better in grammatical ability post test and in reading ability test 2 months later; (2) For the immediate post test, significant ATI (Aptitude Treatment Interaction) were found on several aptitudes, especially on intelligence, suggesting that GA would capitalize on as CA would compensate for intelligence. However, after a 2-month period, the pattern of ATI was found changed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-256
Number of pages10
JournalJapanese Journal of Educational Psychology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • aptitude treatment interaction
  • communicative approach
  • english as a foreign language
  • grammatical ability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this