TY - JOUR
T1 - A many-cone world?
AU - Kiyota, Kozo
N1 - Funding Information:
I wish to thank Mototsugu Fukushige, Tadashi Ito, Alireza Naghavi, Katheryn Russ, two anonymous referees, participants at the 2010 European Trade Study Group Conference, the Spring 2011 Meeting of the Midwest International Economics Group, the Spring 2011 Meeting of the Japanese Economic Association, and seminar participants at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Tohoku University, and University of Bari for their helpful comments. Financial support received from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists ( 21730187 ) and for Scientific Research ( B-22330080 )) and the Murata Science Foundation is acknowledged gratefully. The usual disclaimers apply.
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - The breakdown of global factor price equalization, or a single-cone world, is a central concern in various fields of economics. This paper examines the empirical validities of the following two claims: 1) the multiple-cone Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) model fits better than does the single-cone HO model; and 2) increases in the number of cones improve the fit of the model. One of the contributions of this paper is that it focuses simultaneously on factor endowments, production patterns, and wage disparities across economies. My empirical results support the first claim but not the second claim. The results suggest that although the multiple-cone model performs better than does the single-cone model, the increases in the number of cones do not necessarily result in better performance of the HO model.
AB - The breakdown of global factor price equalization, or a single-cone world, is a central concern in various fields of economics. This paper examines the empirical validities of the following two claims: 1) the multiple-cone Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) model fits better than does the single-cone HO model; and 2) increases in the number of cones improve the fit of the model. One of the contributions of this paper is that it focuses simultaneously on factor endowments, production patterns, and wage disparities across economies. My empirical results support the first claim but not the second claim. The results suggest that although the multiple-cone model performs better than does the single-cone model, the increases in the number of cones do not necessarily result in better performance of the HO model.
KW - Heckscher-Ohlin model
KW - Multiple cones
KW - Sectoral production patterns
KW - Wages
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858075793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858075793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.09.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84858075793
SN - 0022-1996
VL - 86
SP - 345
EP - 354
JO - Journal of International Economics
JF - Journal of International Economics
IS - 2
ER -