A matter of facts

L2 writers’ use of evidence and evaluation in biographical essays

Gordon Myskow, Masumi Ono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores the evaluative language used in high- and low-graded historical biography essays in a CLIL-based university course. The biography genre, marked by an inductive informational structure where authors’ views becomes apparent only after evidence is presented, is a discourse-type that has received less attention in the literature than deductively-patterned argumentative genres. The study examines explicit evaluations in the genre's concluding stage and implicit realizations used as evidence in support of them, providing insight into the underlying rhetorical mechanisms that enable evaluations of historical actors to appear to arise ‘naturally’ from a seemingly dispassionate set of facts. The study found little difference between high- and low-graded essays in their preferences for evaluative subtypes (e.g., ethics/competence-based judgments) and no difference in their selections of positive/negative loadings. The findings suggest that what is more important than the types of evaluations writers use is how evidence is mobilized in support of them and how it is assimilated with evaluations in particular grammar patterns. A pedagogical framework, called ‘FACTS’ is proposed to familiarize writers with options for presenting evidence in support of claims and develop a deeper understanding of how evidence and evaluation collaborate to advance writers’ views.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-70
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Second Language Writing
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Sep 1

Fingerprint

writer
genre
evaluation
evidence
grammar
moral philosophy
Writer
Evaluation
university
discourse
language

Keywords

  • Appraisal
  • Biography
  • CLIL
  • Grammar patterns
  • History
  • L2 writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

A matter of facts : L2 writers’ use of evidence and evaluation in biographical essays. / Myskow, Gordon; Ono, Masumi.

In: Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 41, 01.09.2018, p. 55-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{149405ee0d484cf1a3399776e7b960ac,
title = "A matter of facts: L2 writers’ use of evidence and evaluation in biographical essays",
abstract = "This paper explores the evaluative language used in high- and low-graded historical biography essays in a CLIL-based university course. The biography genre, marked by an inductive informational structure where authors’ views becomes apparent only after evidence is presented, is a discourse-type that has received less attention in the literature than deductively-patterned argumentative genres. The study examines explicit evaluations in the genre's concluding stage and implicit realizations used as evidence in support of them, providing insight into the underlying rhetorical mechanisms that enable evaluations of historical actors to appear to arise ‘naturally’ from a seemingly dispassionate set of facts. The study found little difference between high- and low-graded essays in their preferences for evaluative subtypes (e.g., ethics/competence-based judgments) and no difference in their selections of positive/negative loadings. The findings suggest that what is more important than the types of evaluations writers use is how evidence is mobilized in support of them and how it is assimilated with evaluations in particular grammar patterns. A pedagogical framework, called ‘FACTS’ is proposed to familiarize writers with options for presenting evidence in support of claims and develop a deeper understanding of how evidence and evaluation collaborate to advance writers’ views.",
keywords = "Appraisal, Biography, CLIL, Grammar patterns, History, L2 writing",
author = "Gordon Myskow and Masumi Ono",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jslw.2018.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "55--70",
journal = "Journal of Second Language Writing",
issn = "1060-3743",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A matter of facts

T2 - L2 writers’ use of evidence and evaluation in biographical essays

AU - Myskow, Gordon

AU - Ono, Masumi

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - This paper explores the evaluative language used in high- and low-graded historical biography essays in a CLIL-based university course. The biography genre, marked by an inductive informational structure where authors’ views becomes apparent only after evidence is presented, is a discourse-type that has received less attention in the literature than deductively-patterned argumentative genres. The study examines explicit evaluations in the genre's concluding stage and implicit realizations used as evidence in support of them, providing insight into the underlying rhetorical mechanisms that enable evaluations of historical actors to appear to arise ‘naturally’ from a seemingly dispassionate set of facts. The study found little difference between high- and low-graded essays in their preferences for evaluative subtypes (e.g., ethics/competence-based judgments) and no difference in their selections of positive/negative loadings. The findings suggest that what is more important than the types of evaluations writers use is how evidence is mobilized in support of them and how it is assimilated with evaluations in particular grammar patterns. A pedagogical framework, called ‘FACTS’ is proposed to familiarize writers with options for presenting evidence in support of claims and develop a deeper understanding of how evidence and evaluation collaborate to advance writers’ views.

AB - This paper explores the evaluative language used in high- and low-graded historical biography essays in a CLIL-based university course. The biography genre, marked by an inductive informational structure where authors’ views becomes apparent only after evidence is presented, is a discourse-type that has received less attention in the literature than deductively-patterned argumentative genres. The study examines explicit evaluations in the genre's concluding stage and implicit realizations used as evidence in support of them, providing insight into the underlying rhetorical mechanisms that enable evaluations of historical actors to appear to arise ‘naturally’ from a seemingly dispassionate set of facts. The study found little difference between high- and low-graded essays in their preferences for evaluative subtypes (e.g., ethics/competence-based judgments) and no difference in their selections of positive/negative loadings. The findings suggest that what is more important than the types of evaluations writers use is how evidence is mobilized in support of them and how it is assimilated with evaluations in particular grammar patterns. A pedagogical framework, called ‘FACTS’ is proposed to familiarize writers with options for presenting evidence in support of claims and develop a deeper understanding of how evidence and evaluation collaborate to advance writers’ views.

KW - Appraisal

KW - Biography

KW - CLIL

KW - Grammar patterns

KW - History

KW - L2 writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051398156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051398156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 55

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Second Language Writing

JF - Journal of Second Language Writing

SN - 1060-3743

ER -