TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty
T2 - An upright weight-bearing computed tomography analysis
AU - Sasaki, Ryo
AU - Niki, Yasuo
AU - Kaneda, Kazuya
AU - Yamada, Yoshitake
AU - Nagura, Takeo
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Jinzaki, Masahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Uehara Memorial Foundation [N/A], the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [17H04266], and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [20K08056].
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Tomohiko Ota, Shu Kobayashi, Kengo Harato, and Morio Matsumoto from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, and Yoichi Yokoyama and Minoru Yamada from the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, for providing clinical advice. This work was supported by the Uehara Memorial Foundation [N/A], the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [17H04266], and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [20K08056]. None. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Medicine, Keio University (ID#20150293). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. RS, NY, KK and TN conceived and designed the study. RS and KK performed the experiments. RS, YN, KK and TN performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. YY and MJ performed CT scanning and image acquisition. MN organised the research team. All authors edited and approved the manuscript prior to submission.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Background: The traditional anteroposterior (AP) axis (i.e., Akagi's line) has been widely used as the tibial component AP axis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this AP axis has been defined based on computed tomography (CT) in a non-weight-bearing supine position. In this study, AP axes of the tibial plateau from upright CT in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions were determined and compared. Methods: This study included 43 knees from 23 healthy volunteers. CT images were obtained in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing standing positions using a 320-detector row upright CT scanner. The line perpendicular to surgical transepicondylar axis projected onto the tibia plateau was determined as the AP axis in upright weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Angular differences between these two conditions were measured. Results: The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 7.4 ± 4.3° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Distance between the traditional and upright weight-bearing AP axis was 2.9 ± 1.6 mm at the edge of the tibial plateau. The upright non-weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 3.5 ± 4.1° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Mean angular difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions was 3.9 ± 4.1°. Conclusions: The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in 7.4° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis, showing one-seventh of the tibial tuberosity away from the medial border of the tibial tubercle, which represents a practical landmark for the tibial component AP axis during TKA.
AB - Background: The traditional anteroposterior (AP) axis (i.e., Akagi's line) has been widely used as the tibial component AP axis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this AP axis has been defined based on computed tomography (CT) in a non-weight-bearing supine position. In this study, AP axes of the tibial plateau from upright CT in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions were determined and compared. Methods: This study included 43 knees from 23 healthy volunteers. CT images were obtained in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing standing positions using a 320-detector row upright CT scanner. The line perpendicular to surgical transepicondylar axis projected onto the tibia plateau was determined as the AP axis in upright weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Angular differences between these two conditions were measured. Results: The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 7.4 ± 4.3° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Distance between the traditional and upright weight-bearing AP axis was 2.9 ± 1.6 mm at the edge of the tibial plateau. The upright non-weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 3.5 ± 4.1° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Mean angular difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions was 3.9 ± 4.1°. Conclusions: The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in 7.4° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis, showing one-seventh of the tibial tuberosity away from the medial border of the tibial tubercle, which represents a practical landmark for the tibial component AP axis during TKA.
KW - Anteroposterior axis
KW - Total knee arthroplasty
KW - Upright computed tomography
KW - Weight-bearing condition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129911936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129911936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2022.04.009
DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2022.04.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 35561561
AN - SCOPUS:85129911936
SN - 0968-0160
VL - 36
SP - 80
EP - 86
JO - Knee
JF - Knee
ER -