A prediction formula of supersoft X-ray phase of classical novae

Izumi Hachisu, Mariko Kato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On the basis of the recently developed universal decline law of classical novae, we propose prediction formulae for supersoft X-ray on and off times, i.e., t X-on = (10 ± 1.8)t 3days and t X-off = (5.3 ± 1.4)(t 3)1.5days for 8 ≲ t 3 ≲ 80days. Here t 3 is the newly proposed "intrinsic" decay time during which the brightness drops by 3mag from optical maximum along our universal decline law fitted with observation. We have determined the absolute magnitude of our free-free emission model light curves and derived maximum magnitude versus rate of decline (MMRD) relations. Our theoretical MMRD relations are governed by two parameters, one is the white dwarf (WD) mass and the other is the initial envelope mass at a nova outburst; this second parameter explains the scatter of MMRD points of individual novae. Our theoretical MMRD relations are also in good agreement with the well-known empirical formulae. We also show another empirical relation of MV (15)∼ -5.7 0.3 based on the absolute magnitude of our model light curves, i.e., the absolute magnitude at 15 days after optical maximum is almost common among various novae. We analyzed 10 nova light curves, in which a supersoft X-ray phase was detected, and estimated their WD masses. The models best simultaneously reproducing the optical and supersoft X-ray observations are ONeMg WDs with 1.28 ± 0.04 M (V598 Pup), 1.23 ± 0.05 M (V382 Vel), 1.15 ± 0.06 M (V4743 Sgr), 1.13 ± 0.06 M (V1281 Sco), 1.2 ± 0.05 M (V597 Pup), 1.06 ± 0.07 M (V1494 Aql), 1.04 ± 0.07 M (V2467Cyg), 1.07 ± 0.07 M (V5116 Sgr), 1.05 ± 0.05 M (V574 Pup), and a CO WD with 0.93 ± 0.08 M (V458 Vul). The newly proposed relationships are consistent with the emergence or decay epoch of the supersoft X-ray phase of these 10 novae. Finally, we discuss the mechanism of shock-origin hard X-ray component in relation to the emergence of companion star from the WD envelope.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)680-714
Number of pages35
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume709
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

novae
prediction
predictions
x rays
light curve
envelopes
companion stars
decay
outburst
brightness
shock
time measurement
rate

Keywords

  • Novae, cataclysmic variables
  • Stars: individual (V382 Vel, V598 Pup)
  • Stars: mass loss
  • White dwarfs
  • X-rays: stars

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

A prediction formula of supersoft X-ray phase of classical novae. / Hachisu, Izumi; Kato, Mariko.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 709, No. 2, 2010, p. 680-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hachisu, Izumi ; Kato, Mariko. / A prediction formula of supersoft X-ray phase of classical novae. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 709, No. 2. pp. 680-714.
@article{41feeac1c95f43f4827ec691556c0d0b,
title = "A prediction formula of supersoft X-ray phase of classical novae",
abstract = "On the basis of the recently developed universal decline law of classical novae, we propose prediction formulae for supersoft X-ray on and off times, i.e., t X-on = (10 ± 1.8)t 3days and t X-off = (5.3 ± 1.4)(t 3)1.5days for 8 ≲ t 3 ≲ 80days. Here t 3 is the newly proposed {"}intrinsic{"} decay time during which the brightness drops by 3mag from optical maximum along our universal decline law fitted with observation. We have determined the absolute magnitude of our free-free emission model light curves and derived maximum magnitude versus rate of decline (MMRD) relations. Our theoretical MMRD relations are governed by two parameters, one is the white dwarf (WD) mass and the other is the initial envelope mass at a nova outburst; this second parameter explains the scatter of MMRD points of individual novae. Our theoretical MMRD relations are also in good agreement with the well-known empirical formulae. We also show another empirical relation of MV (15)∼ -5.7 0.3 based on the absolute magnitude of our model light curves, i.e., the absolute magnitude at 15 days after optical maximum is almost common among various novae. We analyzed 10 nova light curves, in which a supersoft X-ray phase was detected, and estimated their WD masses. The models best simultaneously reproducing the optical and supersoft X-ray observations are ONeMg WDs with 1.28 ± 0.04 M ⊙ (V598 Pup), 1.23 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V382 Vel), 1.15 ± 0.06 M ⊙ (V4743 Sgr), 1.13 ± 0.06 M ⊙ (V1281 Sco), 1.2 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V597 Pup), 1.06 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V1494 Aql), 1.04 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V2467Cyg), 1.07 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V5116 Sgr), 1.05 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V574 Pup), and a CO WD with 0.93 ± 0.08 M ⊙ (V458 Vul). The newly proposed relationships are consistent with the emergence or decay epoch of the supersoft X-ray phase of these 10 novae. Finally, we discuss the mechanism of shock-origin hard X-ray component in relation to the emergence of companion star from the WD envelope.",
keywords = "Novae, cataclysmic variables, Stars: individual (V382 Vel, V598 Pup), Stars: mass loss, White dwarfs, X-rays: stars",
author = "Izumi Hachisu and Mariko Kato",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/680",
language = "English",
volume = "709",
pages = "680--714",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prediction formula of supersoft X-ray phase of classical novae

AU - Hachisu, Izumi

AU - Kato, Mariko

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - On the basis of the recently developed universal decline law of classical novae, we propose prediction formulae for supersoft X-ray on and off times, i.e., t X-on = (10 ± 1.8)t 3days and t X-off = (5.3 ± 1.4)(t 3)1.5days for 8 ≲ t 3 ≲ 80days. Here t 3 is the newly proposed "intrinsic" decay time during which the brightness drops by 3mag from optical maximum along our universal decline law fitted with observation. We have determined the absolute magnitude of our free-free emission model light curves and derived maximum magnitude versus rate of decline (MMRD) relations. Our theoretical MMRD relations are governed by two parameters, one is the white dwarf (WD) mass and the other is the initial envelope mass at a nova outburst; this second parameter explains the scatter of MMRD points of individual novae. Our theoretical MMRD relations are also in good agreement with the well-known empirical formulae. We also show another empirical relation of MV (15)∼ -5.7 0.3 based on the absolute magnitude of our model light curves, i.e., the absolute magnitude at 15 days after optical maximum is almost common among various novae. We analyzed 10 nova light curves, in which a supersoft X-ray phase was detected, and estimated their WD masses. The models best simultaneously reproducing the optical and supersoft X-ray observations are ONeMg WDs with 1.28 ± 0.04 M ⊙ (V598 Pup), 1.23 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V382 Vel), 1.15 ± 0.06 M ⊙ (V4743 Sgr), 1.13 ± 0.06 M ⊙ (V1281 Sco), 1.2 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V597 Pup), 1.06 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V1494 Aql), 1.04 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V2467Cyg), 1.07 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V5116 Sgr), 1.05 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V574 Pup), and a CO WD with 0.93 ± 0.08 M ⊙ (V458 Vul). The newly proposed relationships are consistent with the emergence or decay epoch of the supersoft X-ray phase of these 10 novae. Finally, we discuss the mechanism of shock-origin hard X-ray component in relation to the emergence of companion star from the WD envelope.

AB - On the basis of the recently developed universal decline law of classical novae, we propose prediction formulae for supersoft X-ray on and off times, i.e., t X-on = (10 ± 1.8)t 3days and t X-off = (5.3 ± 1.4)(t 3)1.5days for 8 ≲ t 3 ≲ 80days. Here t 3 is the newly proposed "intrinsic" decay time during which the brightness drops by 3mag from optical maximum along our universal decline law fitted with observation. We have determined the absolute magnitude of our free-free emission model light curves and derived maximum magnitude versus rate of decline (MMRD) relations. Our theoretical MMRD relations are governed by two parameters, one is the white dwarf (WD) mass and the other is the initial envelope mass at a nova outburst; this second parameter explains the scatter of MMRD points of individual novae. Our theoretical MMRD relations are also in good agreement with the well-known empirical formulae. We also show another empirical relation of MV (15)∼ -5.7 0.3 based on the absolute magnitude of our model light curves, i.e., the absolute magnitude at 15 days after optical maximum is almost common among various novae. We analyzed 10 nova light curves, in which a supersoft X-ray phase was detected, and estimated their WD masses. The models best simultaneously reproducing the optical and supersoft X-ray observations are ONeMg WDs with 1.28 ± 0.04 M ⊙ (V598 Pup), 1.23 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V382 Vel), 1.15 ± 0.06 M ⊙ (V4743 Sgr), 1.13 ± 0.06 M ⊙ (V1281 Sco), 1.2 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V597 Pup), 1.06 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V1494 Aql), 1.04 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V2467Cyg), 1.07 ± 0.07 M ⊙ (V5116 Sgr), 1.05 ± 0.05 M ⊙ (V574 Pup), and a CO WD with 0.93 ± 0.08 M ⊙ (V458 Vul). The newly proposed relationships are consistent with the emergence or decay epoch of the supersoft X-ray phase of these 10 novae. Finally, we discuss the mechanism of shock-origin hard X-ray component in relation to the emergence of companion star from the WD envelope.

KW - Novae, cataclysmic variables

KW - Stars: individual (V382 Vel, V598 Pup)

KW - Stars: mass loss

KW - White dwarfs

KW - X-rays: stars

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73949098132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73949098132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/680

DO - 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/680

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:73949098132

VL - 709

SP - 680

EP - 714

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2

ER -