A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan

Yoshikazu Togo, Rikiya Taoka, Shingo Yamamoto, Yoshiki Hiyama, Teruhisa Uehara, Jiroh Hashimoto, Yuichiro Kurimura, Satoshi Takahashi, Taiji Tsukamoto, Jun Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Hiroshi Kiyota, Satoshi Yazawa, Mototsugu Oya, Mitsuru Yasuda, Takashi Deguchi, Kiyohito Ishikawa, Kiyotaka Hoshinaga, Minori Matsumoto, Katsumi ShigemuraKazushi Tanaka, Soichi Arakawa, Masato Fujisawa, Koichiro Wada, Shinya Uehara, Toyohiko Watanabe, Hiromi Kumon, Kanao Kobayashi, Akio Matsubara, Masahiro Matsumoto, Takehiko Sho, Ryoichi Hamasuna, Tetsuro Matsumoto, Hiroshi Hayami, Takashi Yamane, Masayuki Nakagawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

(Purpose): To survey the present condition of administration method of the antimicrobial prophylactic (AMP) agents for the perioperative infection in Japan on revising "The Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologic field (2006)". (Patients and methods): With the approval of the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) in 2011, all of the principal urological training institutions certified by JUA (n = 836) were encouraged to participate to survey their adherence to the JUA guidelines (published in 2006) for AMP to prevent perioperative infection in urological field, and 446 (53.3%) institutions responded to the questionnaire. (Results): The rates of following the JUA guidelines of, "completely", "mainly", "not too much", and "not at all" were 6.5%, 69.7%, 22.0% and 1.6%, respectively. The guidelines were followed for open clean operations in 48.5%, open clean-contaminated operations in 66.4%, open contaminated operations in 61.8%, laparoscopic clean operations in 54.1%, laparoscopic clean-contaminated operations in 61.2%, transurethral resection of bladder tumor in 71.5%, transurethral resection of prostate in 68.9%, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy in 68.2%, prostate biopsy in 43.2%, and cystoscopy were in 42.2%, respectively. However, in terms of duration of AMP administration, the longer duration than those recommended by the guidelines were observed for clean surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy, prostate biopsy, and cystoscopy. (Conclusions): In terms of kinds of AMP, the guidelines were almostly followed in all operative procedures. However, the duration of AMP administration were longer than those recommended by the guidelines. On revision of "Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologie field (2006)", these data would be taken into consideration to avoid dissociation between the guidelines and the practical side in the urologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)579-588
Number of pages10
JournalJapanese Journal of Urology
Volume104
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jul

Fingerprint

Japan
Guidelines
Infection
Ureteroscopy
Cystoscopy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Prostate
Biopsy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Operative Surgical Procedures
Anti-Infective Agents

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial prophylaxis
  • Perioperative infection
  • Questionnaire survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Togo, Y., Taoka, R., Yamamoto, S., Hiyama, Y., Uehara, T., Hashimoto, J., ... Nakagawa, M. (2013). A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan. Japanese Journal of Urology, 104(4), 579-588.

A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan. / Togo, Yoshikazu; Taoka, Rikiya; Yamamoto, Shingo; Hiyama, Yoshiki; Uehara, Teruhisa; Hashimoto, Jiroh; Kurimura, Yuichiro; Takahashi, Satoshi; Tsukamoto, Taiji; Miyazaki, Jun; Nishiyama, Hiroyuki; Kiyota, Hiroshi; Yazawa, Satoshi; Oya, Mototsugu; Yasuda, Mitsuru; Deguchi, Takashi; Ishikawa, Kiyohito; Hoshinaga, Kiyotaka; Matsumoto, Minori; Shigemura, Katsumi; Tanaka, Kazushi; Arakawa, Soichi; Fujisawa, Masato; Wada, Koichiro; Uehara, Shinya; Watanabe, Toyohiko; Kumon, Hiromi; Kobayashi, Kanao; Matsubara, Akio; Matsumoto, Masahiro; Sho, Takehiko; Hamasuna, Ryoichi; Matsumoto, Tetsuro; Hayami, Hiroshi; Yamane, Takashi; Nakagawa, Masayuki.

In: Japanese Journal of Urology, Vol. 104, No. 4, 07.2013, p. 579-588.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Togo, Y, Taoka, R, Yamamoto, S, Hiyama, Y, Uehara, T, Hashimoto, J, Kurimura, Y, Takahashi, S, Tsukamoto, T, Miyazaki, J, Nishiyama, H, Kiyota, H, Yazawa, S, Oya, M, Yasuda, M, Deguchi, T, Ishikawa, K, Hoshinaga, K, Matsumoto, M, Shigemura, K, Tanaka, K, Arakawa, S, Fujisawa, M, Wada, K, Uehara, S, Watanabe, T, Kumon, H, Kobayashi, K, Matsubara, A, Matsumoto, M, Sho, T, Hamasuna, R, Matsumoto, T, Hayami, H, Yamane, T & Nakagawa, M 2013, 'A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan', Japanese Journal of Urology, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 579-588.
Togo Y, Taoka R, Yamamoto S, Hiyama Y, Uehara T, Hashimoto J et al. A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan. Japanese Journal of Urology. 2013 Jul;104(4):579-588.
Togo, Yoshikazu ; Taoka, Rikiya ; Yamamoto, Shingo ; Hiyama, Yoshiki ; Uehara, Teruhisa ; Hashimoto, Jiroh ; Kurimura, Yuichiro ; Takahashi, Satoshi ; Tsukamoto, Taiji ; Miyazaki, Jun ; Nishiyama, Hiroyuki ; Kiyota, Hiroshi ; Yazawa, Satoshi ; Oya, Mototsugu ; Yasuda, Mitsuru ; Deguchi, Takashi ; Ishikawa, Kiyohito ; Hoshinaga, Kiyotaka ; Matsumoto, Minori ; Shigemura, Katsumi ; Tanaka, Kazushi ; Arakawa, Soichi ; Fujisawa, Masato ; Wada, Koichiro ; Uehara, Shinya ; Watanabe, Toyohiko ; Kumon, Hiromi ; Kobayashi, Kanao ; Matsubara, Akio ; Matsumoto, Masahiro ; Sho, Takehiko ; Hamasuna, Ryoichi ; Matsumoto, Tetsuro ; Hayami, Hiroshi ; Yamane, Takashi ; Nakagawa, Masayuki. / A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan. In: Japanese Journal of Urology. 2013 ; Vol. 104, No. 4. pp. 579-588.
@article{45359eae82e24cdd924c390a7405f29b,
title = "A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan",
abstract = "(Purpose): To survey the present condition of administration method of the antimicrobial prophylactic (AMP) agents for the perioperative infection in Japan on revising {"}The Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologic field (2006){"}. (Patients and methods): With the approval of the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) in 2011, all of the principal urological training institutions certified by JUA (n = 836) were encouraged to participate to survey their adherence to the JUA guidelines (published in 2006) for AMP to prevent perioperative infection in urological field, and 446 (53.3{\%}) institutions responded to the questionnaire. (Results): The rates of following the JUA guidelines of, {"}completely{"}, {"}mainly{"}, {"}not too much{"}, and {"}not at all{"} were 6.5{\%}, 69.7{\%}, 22.0{\%} and 1.6{\%}, respectively. The guidelines were followed for open clean operations in 48.5{\%}, open clean-contaminated operations in 66.4{\%}, open contaminated operations in 61.8{\%}, laparoscopic clean operations in 54.1{\%}, laparoscopic clean-contaminated operations in 61.2{\%}, transurethral resection of bladder tumor in 71.5{\%}, transurethral resection of prostate in 68.9{\%}, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy in 68.2{\%}, prostate biopsy in 43.2{\%}, and cystoscopy were in 42.2{\%}, respectively. However, in terms of duration of AMP administration, the longer duration than those recommended by the guidelines were observed for clean surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy, prostate biopsy, and cystoscopy. (Conclusions): In terms of kinds of AMP, the guidelines were almostly followed in all operative procedures. However, the duration of AMP administration were longer than those recommended by the guidelines. On revision of {"}Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologie field (2006){"}, these data would be taken into consideration to avoid dissociation between the guidelines and the practical side in the urologists.",
keywords = "Antimicrobial prophylaxis, Perioperative infection, Questionnaire survey",
author = "Yoshikazu Togo and Rikiya Taoka and Shingo Yamamoto and Yoshiki Hiyama and Teruhisa Uehara and Jiroh Hashimoto and Yuichiro Kurimura and Satoshi Takahashi and Taiji Tsukamoto and Jun Miyazaki and Hiroyuki Nishiyama and Hiroshi Kiyota and Satoshi Yazawa and Mototsugu Oya and Mitsuru Yasuda and Takashi Deguchi and Kiyohito Ishikawa and Kiyotaka Hoshinaga and Minori Matsumoto and Katsumi Shigemura and Kazushi Tanaka and Soichi Arakawa and Masato Fujisawa and Koichiro Wada and Shinya Uehara and Toyohiko Watanabe and Hiromi Kumon and Kanao Kobayashi and Akio Matsubara and Masahiro Matsumoto and Takehiko Sho and Ryoichi Hamasuna and Tetsuro Matsumoto and Hiroshi Hayami and Takashi Yamane and Masayuki Nakagawa",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "579--588",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Urology",
issn = "0021-5287",
publisher = "Japanese Urological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A questionnaire survey of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in urological field in Japan

AU - Togo, Yoshikazu

AU - Taoka, Rikiya

AU - Yamamoto, Shingo

AU - Hiyama, Yoshiki

AU - Uehara, Teruhisa

AU - Hashimoto, Jiroh

AU - Kurimura, Yuichiro

AU - Takahashi, Satoshi

AU - Tsukamoto, Taiji

AU - Miyazaki, Jun

AU - Nishiyama, Hiroyuki

AU - Kiyota, Hiroshi

AU - Yazawa, Satoshi

AU - Oya, Mototsugu

AU - Yasuda, Mitsuru

AU - Deguchi, Takashi

AU - Ishikawa, Kiyohito

AU - Hoshinaga, Kiyotaka

AU - Matsumoto, Minori

AU - Shigemura, Katsumi

AU - Tanaka, Kazushi

AU - Arakawa, Soichi

AU - Fujisawa, Masato

AU - Wada, Koichiro

AU - Uehara, Shinya

AU - Watanabe, Toyohiko

AU - Kumon, Hiromi

AU - Kobayashi, Kanao

AU - Matsubara, Akio

AU - Matsumoto, Masahiro

AU - Sho, Takehiko

AU - Hamasuna, Ryoichi

AU - Matsumoto, Tetsuro

AU - Hayami, Hiroshi

AU - Yamane, Takashi

AU - Nakagawa, Masayuki

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - (Purpose): To survey the present condition of administration method of the antimicrobial prophylactic (AMP) agents for the perioperative infection in Japan on revising "The Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologic field (2006)". (Patients and methods): With the approval of the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) in 2011, all of the principal urological training institutions certified by JUA (n = 836) were encouraged to participate to survey their adherence to the JUA guidelines (published in 2006) for AMP to prevent perioperative infection in urological field, and 446 (53.3%) institutions responded to the questionnaire. (Results): The rates of following the JUA guidelines of, "completely", "mainly", "not too much", and "not at all" were 6.5%, 69.7%, 22.0% and 1.6%, respectively. The guidelines were followed for open clean operations in 48.5%, open clean-contaminated operations in 66.4%, open contaminated operations in 61.8%, laparoscopic clean operations in 54.1%, laparoscopic clean-contaminated operations in 61.2%, transurethral resection of bladder tumor in 71.5%, transurethral resection of prostate in 68.9%, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy in 68.2%, prostate biopsy in 43.2%, and cystoscopy were in 42.2%, respectively. However, in terms of duration of AMP administration, the longer duration than those recommended by the guidelines were observed for clean surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy, prostate biopsy, and cystoscopy. (Conclusions): In terms of kinds of AMP, the guidelines were almostly followed in all operative procedures. However, the duration of AMP administration were longer than those recommended by the guidelines. On revision of "Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologie field (2006)", these data would be taken into consideration to avoid dissociation between the guidelines and the practical side in the urologists.

AB - (Purpose): To survey the present condition of administration method of the antimicrobial prophylactic (AMP) agents for the perioperative infection in Japan on revising "The Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologic field (2006)". (Patients and methods): With the approval of the Japanese Urological Association (JUA) in 2011, all of the principal urological training institutions certified by JUA (n = 836) were encouraged to participate to survey their adherence to the JUA guidelines (published in 2006) for AMP to prevent perioperative infection in urological field, and 446 (53.3%) institutions responded to the questionnaire. (Results): The rates of following the JUA guidelines of, "completely", "mainly", "not too much", and "not at all" were 6.5%, 69.7%, 22.0% and 1.6%, respectively. The guidelines were followed for open clean operations in 48.5%, open clean-contaminated operations in 66.4%, open contaminated operations in 61.8%, laparoscopic clean operations in 54.1%, laparoscopic clean-contaminated operations in 61.2%, transurethral resection of bladder tumor in 71.5%, transurethral resection of prostate in 68.9%, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy in 68.2%, prostate biopsy in 43.2%, and cystoscopy were in 42.2%, respectively. However, in terms of duration of AMP administration, the longer duration than those recommended by the guidelines were observed for clean surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureteroscopy and transurethral ureterolithotomy, prostate biopsy, and cystoscopy. (Conclusions): In terms of kinds of AMP, the guidelines were almostly followed in all operative procedures. However, the duration of AMP administration were longer than those recommended by the guidelines. On revision of "Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urologie field (2006)", these data would be taken into consideration to avoid dissociation between the guidelines and the practical side in the urologists.

KW - Antimicrobial prophylaxis

KW - Perioperative infection

KW - Questionnaire survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882800690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882800690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23971366

AN - SCOPUS:84882800690

VL - 104

SP - 579

EP - 588

JO - Japanese Journal of Urology

JF - Japanese Journal of Urology

SN - 0021-5287

IS - 4

ER -