A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Lindsay Tetreault, Hiroaki Nakashima, So Kato, Michael Kryshtalskyj, Narihito Nagoshi, Aria Nouri, Anoushka Singh, Michael G. Fehlings

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Design: Systematic review. Objective: To conduct a systematic review to (1) summarize various classification systems used to describe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and (2) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities and the reliability of these classification systems. Methods: A search was performed to identify studies that used a classification system to categorize patients with OPLL. Furthermore, studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities or the reliability of a classification system. Results: A total of 167 studies were deemed relevant. Five classification systems were developed based on X-ray: the 9-classification system (0.60%); continuous, segmental, mixed, localized or focal, circumscribed and others (92.81%); hook, staple, bridge, and total types (2.40%); distribution of OPLL (2.40%); and K-line classification (4.19%). Six methods were based on computed tomography scans: free-type, contiguous-type, and broken sign (0.60%); hill-, plateau-, square-, mushroom-, irregular-, or round-shaped (5.99%); rectangular, oval, triangular, or pedunculate (1.20%); centralized or laterally deviated (1.80%); plank-, spindle-, or rod-shaped (0.60%); and rule of nine (0.60%). Classification systems based on 3-dimensional computed tomography were bridging and nonbridging (1.20%) and flat, irregular, and localized (0.60%). A single classification system was based on magnetic resonance imaging: triangular, teardrop, or boomerang. Finally, a variation of methods was used to classify OPLL associated with the dura mater (4.19%). Conclusions: The most common method of classification was that proposed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Other important methods include K-line (+/−), signs of dural ossification, and patterns of distribution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-103
Number of pages19
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
Tomography
Dura Mater
Agaricales
Osteogenesis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • classification systems
  • dural ossification
  • K-line classification
  • ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
  • reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. / Tetreault, Lindsay; Nakashima, Hiroaki; Kato, So; Kryshtalskyj, Michael; Nagoshi, Narihito; Nouri, Aria; Singh, Anoushka; Fehlings, Michael G.

In: Global Spine Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 85-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Tetreault, L, Nakashima, H, Kato, S, Kryshtalskyj, M, Nagoshi, N, Nouri, A, Singh, A & Fehlings, MG 2019, 'A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament', Global Spine Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217720421
Tetreault, Lindsay ; Nakashima, Hiroaki ; Kato, So ; Kryshtalskyj, Michael ; Nagoshi, Narihito ; Nouri, Aria ; Singh, Anoushka ; Fehlings, Michael G. / A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. In: Global Spine Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 85-103.
@article{b272163e102b4f11ae73b0b4659b6ea2,
title = "A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament",
abstract = "Design: Systematic review. Objective: To conduct a systematic review to (1) summarize various classification systems used to describe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and (2) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities and the reliability of these classification systems. Methods: A search was performed to identify studies that used a classification system to categorize patients with OPLL. Furthermore, studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities or the reliability of a classification system. Results: A total of 167 studies were deemed relevant. Five classification systems were developed based on X-ray: the 9-classification system (0.60{\%}); continuous, segmental, mixed, localized or focal, circumscribed and others (92.81{\%}); hook, staple, bridge, and total types (2.40{\%}); distribution of OPLL (2.40{\%}); and K-line classification (4.19{\%}). Six methods were based on computed tomography scans: free-type, contiguous-type, and broken sign (0.60{\%}); hill-, plateau-, square-, mushroom-, irregular-, or round-shaped (5.99{\%}); rectangular, oval, triangular, or pedunculate (1.20{\%}); centralized or laterally deviated (1.80{\%}); plank-, spindle-, or rod-shaped (0.60{\%}); and rule of nine (0.60{\%}). Classification systems based on 3-dimensional computed tomography were bridging and nonbridging (1.20{\%}) and flat, irregular, and localized (0.60{\%}). A single classification system was based on magnetic resonance imaging: triangular, teardrop, or boomerang. Finally, a variation of methods was used to classify OPLL associated with the dura mater (4.19{\%}). Conclusions: The most common method of classification was that proposed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Other important methods include K-line (+/−), signs of dural ossification, and patterns of distribution.",
keywords = "classification systems, dural ossification, K-line classification, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, reliability",
author = "Lindsay Tetreault and Hiroaki Nakashima and So Kato and Michael Kryshtalskyj and Narihito Nagoshi and Aria Nouri and Anoushka Singh and Fehlings, {Michael G.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2192568217720421",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "85--103",
journal = "Global Spine Journal",
issn = "2192-5682",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

AU - Tetreault, Lindsay

AU - Nakashima, Hiroaki

AU - Kato, So

AU - Kryshtalskyj, Michael

AU - Nagoshi, Narihito

AU - Nouri, Aria

AU - Singh, Anoushka

AU - Fehlings, Michael G.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Design: Systematic review. Objective: To conduct a systematic review to (1) summarize various classification systems used to describe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and (2) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities and the reliability of these classification systems. Methods: A search was performed to identify studies that used a classification system to categorize patients with OPLL. Furthermore, studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities or the reliability of a classification system. Results: A total of 167 studies were deemed relevant. Five classification systems were developed based on X-ray: the 9-classification system (0.60%); continuous, segmental, mixed, localized or focal, circumscribed and others (92.81%); hook, staple, bridge, and total types (2.40%); distribution of OPLL (2.40%); and K-line classification (4.19%). Six methods were based on computed tomography scans: free-type, contiguous-type, and broken sign (0.60%); hill-, plateau-, square-, mushroom-, irregular-, or round-shaped (5.99%); rectangular, oval, triangular, or pedunculate (1.20%); centralized or laterally deviated (1.80%); plank-, spindle-, or rod-shaped (0.60%); and rule of nine (0.60%). Classification systems based on 3-dimensional computed tomography were bridging and nonbridging (1.20%) and flat, irregular, and localized (0.60%). A single classification system was based on magnetic resonance imaging: triangular, teardrop, or boomerang. Finally, a variation of methods was used to classify OPLL associated with the dura mater (4.19%). Conclusions: The most common method of classification was that proposed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Other important methods include K-line (+/−), signs of dural ossification, and patterns of distribution.

AB - Design: Systematic review. Objective: To conduct a systematic review to (1) summarize various classification systems used to describe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and (2) evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities and the reliability of these classification systems. Methods: A search was performed to identify studies that used a classification system to categorize patients with OPLL. Furthermore, studies were included if they reported the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities or the reliability of a classification system. Results: A total of 167 studies were deemed relevant. Five classification systems were developed based on X-ray: the 9-classification system (0.60%); continuous, segmental, mixed, localized or focal, circumscribed and others (92.81%); hook, staple, bridge, and total types (2.40%); distribution of OPLL (2.40%); and K-line classification (4.19%). Six methods were based on computed tomography scans: free-type, contiguous-type, and broken sign (0.60%); hill-, plateau-, square-, mushroom-, irregular-, or round-shaped (5.99%); rectangular, oval, triangular, or pedunculate (1.20%); centralized or laterally deviated (1.80%); plank-, spindle-, or rod-shaped (0.60%); and rule of nine (0.60%). Classification systems based on 3-dimensional computed tomography were bridging and nonbridging (1.20%) and flat, irregular, and localized (0.60%). A single classification system was based on magnetic resonance imaging: triangular, teardrop, or boomerang. Finally, a variation of methods was used to classify OPLL associated with the dura mater (4.19%). Conclusions: The most common method of classification was that proposed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Other important methods include K-line (+/−), signs of dural ossification, and patterns of distribution.

KW - classification systems

KW - dural ossification

KW - K-line classification

KW - ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

KW - reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060976722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060976722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2192568217720421

DO - 10.1177/2192568217720421

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85060976722

VL - 9

SP - 85

EP - 103

JO - Global Spine Journal

JF - Global Spine Journal

SN - 2192-5682

IS - 1

ER -