Accuracy and precision of CT-based endocranial capacity estimations: A comparison with the conventional millet seed method and application to the Minatogawa 1 skull

Daisuke Kubo, Reiko Kono, Aiko Saso, Souichiro Mizushima, Gen Suwa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An increasing number of studies determine endocranial capacity (ECC) digitally using serial computed tomographic (CT) scan data. However, the multiple causes of errors inherent in such measurements and the resulting degree of accuracy have not yet been fully examined. In the present study, five observers estimated the ECCs of two modern human crania by segmentation of CT data (voxel size 0.380 mm) and by means of the conventional millet seed method. The ECC estimations were much more consistent in the CT-based (technical error, TEM = 1.4 cc) than the millet seed (TEM = 11.8 cc) methods. The estimated capacities also tended to be larger in the latter, suggesting possible systematic bias. Next, the causes and degree of error in the CT-based method were examined. Error due to size calibration of the CT images was no more than 3 cc (± 1.5 cc) per 1000 cc. Errors involved in delineating the endocranial cavity were evaluated as follows. First, we adopted a segmentation routine in which a single global threshold value was applied to most of the volume, and then supplemented locally by more appropriate values in the regions where the global value was insufficient. We then estimated the potential error introduced by choosing a global threshold value. We found this to be within 5 cc (per 1000 cc). This error range increased to 7.5 cc (per 1000 cc), when using a lower resolution data set (slice thickness 1.14 mm). Another source of interobserver error involves the blocking of foramina and canals, which we estimated to be less than 2 cc (per 1000 cc). Adding these various effects, our investigations indicate that ECC estimations based on high-resolution CT data are accurate to within ± 5 cc per 1000 cc. Finally, we reevaluated the ECC of the Minatogawa 1 skull to be 1335 cc (with a probable range of 1327-1343 ± 5 cc), considerably smaller than the originally reported value of 1390 cc obtained by the millet seed method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-85
Number of pages9
JournalAnthropological Science
Volume116
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Values
cause
trend
segmentation

Keywords

  • Endocranial capacity
  • Measurement error
  • Micro-CT
  • Minatogawa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Accuracy and precision of CT-based endocranial capacity estimations : A comparison with the conventional millet seed method and application to the Minatogawa 1 skull. / Kubo, Daisuke; Kono, Reiko; Saso, Aiko; Mizushima, Souichiro; Suwa, Gen.

In: Anthropological Science, Vol. 116, No. 1, 2008, p. 77-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9fade02648a640378c715c25a92c05bd,
title = "Accuracy and precision of CT-based endocranial capacity estimations: A comparison with the conventional millet seed method and application to the Minatogawa 1 skull",
abstract = "An increasing number of studies determine endocranial capacity (ECC) digitally using serial computed tomographic (CT) scan data. However, the multiple causes of errors inherent in such measurements and the resulting degree of accuracy have not yet been fully examined. In the present study, five observers estimated the ECCs of two modern human crania by segmentation of CT data (voxel size 0.380 mm) and by means of the conventional millet seed method. The ECC estimations were much more consistent in the CT-based (technical error, TEM = 1.4 cc) than the millet seed (TEM = 11.8 cc) methods. The estimated capacities also tended to be larger in the latter, suggesting possible systematic bias. Next, the causes and degree of error in the CT-based method were examined. Error due to size calibration of the CT images was no more than 3 cc (± 1.5 cc) per 1000 cc. Errors involved in delineating the endocranial cavity were evaluated as follows. First, we adopted a segmentation routine in which a single global threshold value was applied to most of the volume, and then supplemented locally by more appropriate values in the regions where the global value was insufficient. We then estimated the potential error introduced by choosing a global threshold value. We found this to be within 5 cc (per 1000 cc). This error range increased to 7.5 cc (per 1000 cc), when using a lower resolution data set (slice thickness 1.14 mm). Another source of interobserver error involves the blocking of foramina and canals, which we estimated to be less than 2 cc (per 1000 cc). Adding these various effects, our investigations indicate that ECC estimations based on high-resolution CT data are accurate to within ± 5 cc per 1000 cc. Finally, we reevaluated the ECC of the Minatogawa 1 skull to be 1335 cc (with a probable range of 1327-1343 ± 5 cc), considerably smaller than the originally reported value of 1390 cc obtained by the millet seed method.",
keywords = "Endocranial capacity, Measurement error, Micro-CT, Minatogawa",
author = "Daisuke Kubo and Reiko Kono and Aiko Saso and Souichiro Mizushima and Gen Suwa",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1537/ase.070502",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "77--85",
journal = "Anthropological Science",
issn = "0918-7960",
publisher = "Anthropological Society of Nippon",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and precision of CT-based endocranial capacity estimations

T2 - A comparison with the conventional millet seed method and application to the Minatogawa 1 skull

AU - Kubo, Daisuke

AU - Kono, Reiko

AU - Saso, Aiko

AU - Mizushima, Souichiro

AU - Suwa, Gen

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - An increasing number of studies determine endocranial capacity (ECC) digitally using serial computed tomographic (CT) scan data. However, the multiple causes of errors inherent in such measurements and the resulting degree of accuracy have not yet been fully examined. In the present study, five observers estimated the ECCs of two modern human crania by segmentation of CT data (voxel size 0.380 mm) and by means of the conventional millet seed method. The ECC estimations were much more consistent in the CT-based (technical error, TEM = 1.4 cc) than the millet seed (TEM = 11.8 cc) methods. The estimated capacities also tended to be larger in the latter, suggesting possible systematic bias. Next, the causes and degree of error in the CT-based method were examined. Error due to size calibration of the CT images was no more than 3 cc (± 1.5 cc) per 1000 cc. Errors involved in delineating the endocranial cavity were evaluated as follows. First, we adopted a segmentation routine in which a single global threshold value was applied to most of the volume, and then supplemented locally by more appropriate values in the regions where the global value was insufficient. We then estimated the potential error introduced by choosing a global threshold value. We found this to be within 5 cc (per 1000 cc). This error range increased to 7.5 cc (per 1000 cc), when using a lower resolution data set (slice thickness 1.14 mm). Another source of interobserver error involves the blocking of foramina and canals, which we estimated to be less than 2 cc (per 1000 cc). Adding these various effects, our investigations indicate that ECC estimations based on high-resolution CT data are accurate to within ± 5 cc per 1000 cc. Finally, we reevaluated the ECC of the Minatogawa 1 skull to be 1335 cc (with a probable range of 1327-1343 ± 5 cc), considerably smaller than the originally reported value of 1390 cc obtained by the millet seed method.

AB - An increasing number of studies determine endocranial capacity (ECC) digitally using serial computed tomographic (CT) scan data. However, the multiple causes of errors inherent in such measurements and the resulting degree of accuracy have not yet been fully examined. In the present study, five observers estimated the ECCs of two modern human crania by segmentation of CT data (voxel size 0.380 mm) and by means of the conventional millet seed method. The ECC estimations were much more consistent in the CT-based (technical error, TEM = 1.4 cc) than the millet seed (TEM = 11.8 cc) methods. The estimated capacities also tended to be larger in the latter, suggesting possible systematic bias. Next, the causes and degree of error in the CT-based method were examined. Error due to size calibration of the CT images was no more than 3 cc (± 1.5 cc) per 1000 cc. Errors involved in delineating the endocranial cavity were evaluated as follows. First, we adopted a segmentation routine in which a single global threshold value was applied to most of the volume, and then supplemented locally by more appropriate values in the regions where the global value was insufficient. We then estimated the potential error introduced by choosing a global threshold value. We found this to be within 5 cc (per 1000 cc). This error range increased to 7.5 cc (per 1000 cc), when using a lower resolution data set (slice thickness 1.14 mm). Another source of interobserver error involves the blocking of foramina and canals, which we estimated to be less than 2 cc (per 1000 cc). Adding these various effects, our investigations indicate that ECC estimations based on high-resolution CT data are accurate to within ± 5 cc per 1000 cc. Finally, we reevaluated the ECC of the Minatogawa 1 skull to be 1335 cc (with a probable range of 1327-1343 ± 5 cc), considerably smaller than the originally reported value of 1390 cc obtained by the millet seed method.

KW - Endocranial capacity

KW - Measurement error

KW - Micro-CT

KW - Minatogawa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43249089415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43249089415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1537/ase.070502

DO - 10.1537/ase.070502

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:43249089415

VL - 116

SP - 77

EP - 85

JO - Anthropological Science

JF - Anthropological Science

SN - 0918-7960

IS - 1

ER -