Aliens in Antarctica

Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk

Ad H.L. Huiskes, Niek J.M. Gremmen, Dana M. Bergstrom, Yves Frenot, Kevin A. Hughes, Satoshi Imura, Kate Kiefer, Marc Lebouvier, Jennifer E. Lee, Megumu Tsujimoto, Chris Ware, Bart Van de Vijver, Steven L. Chown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite considerable research on biological invasions, key areas remain poorly explored, especially ways to reduce unintentional propagule transfer. The Antarctic represents a microcosm of the situation, with the numbers of established non-native species growing. Information to help reduce potential impacts is therefore critical. We measured the propagule load of seeds, and fragments of bryophytes and lichens (the number of other plant or animal fragments was too low to draw any conclusions) carried in the clothing and gear of visitors to the Antarctic, during the 2007/08 austral summer. Samples were collected from different categories of visitors associated with national research programs and tourism and different categories of clothing and gear, new as well as used. We also collected information about the timing of travel and the regions visitors had travelled to prior to Antarctic travel. Seeds were found in 20% and 45% of tourist and science visitor samples, respectively. For bryophyte and lichen fragments the proportions were 11% and 20%, respectively. Footwear, trousers and bags belonging to field scientists were the highest risk items, especially of those personnel which had previously visited protected areas, parklands/botanic gardens or alpine areas. Tourists who visited rural/agricultural areas prior to travel, and/or travel with national programs or on smaller tourist vessels had the highest probability of transferring plant propagules. Travel either during the boreal or austral autumn months increased the probability of propagule presence. Our assessment is applicable to other areas given evidence of propagule transfer patterns in those areas that are broadly similar to those documented here.The current work provides a sound evidence base for both self-regulation (e.g. taking care of personal equipment) and organization-based regulation (e.g. issuing guidelines and holding regular inspections) to reduce propagule transfer of plants to the Antarctic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-284
Number of pages7
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume171
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

propagation materials
propagule
travel
Antarctica
tourists
bryophyte
clothing
lichen
lichens
seed
biological invasion
botanical gardens
tourism
research programs
seeds
microcosm
research program
human resources
garden
bags

Keywords

  • Biological invasions
  • Propagule pressure
  • Risk assessment
  • Self-assessment
  • Tourism
  • Vessel size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Huiskes, A. H. L., Gremmen, N. J. M., Bergstrom, D. M., Frenot, Y., Hughes, K. A., Imura, S., ... Chown, S. L. (2014). Aliens in Antarctica: Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk. Biological Conservation, 171, 278-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.038

Aliens in Antarctica : Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk. / Huiskes, Ad H.L.; Gremmen, Niek J.M.; Bergstrom, Dana M.; Frenot, Yves; Hughes, Kevin A.; Imura, Satoshi; Kiefer, Kate; Lebouvier, Marc; Lee, Jennifer E.; Tsujimoto, Megumu; Ware, Chris; Van de Vijver, Bart; Chown, Steven L.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 171, 01.03.2014, p. 278-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huiskes, AHL, Gremmen, NJM, Bergstrom, DM, Frenot, Y, Hughes, KA, Imura, S, Kiefer, K, Lebouvier, M, Lee, JE, Tsujimoto, M, Ware, C, Van de Vijver, B & Chown, SL 2014, 'Aliens in Antarctica: Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk', Biological Conservation, vol. 171, pp. 278-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.038
Huiskes, Ad H.L. ; Gremmen, Niek J.M. ; Bergstrom, Dana M. ; Frenot, Yves ; Hughes, Kevin A. ; Imura, Satoshi ; Kiefer, Kate ; Lebouvier, Marc ; Lee, Jennifer E. ; Tsujimoto, Megumu ; Ware, Chris ; Van de Vijver, Bart ; Chown, Steven L. / Aliens in Antarctica : Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk. In: Biological Conservation. 2014 ; Vol. 171. pp. 278-284.
@article{f3c9a7ac92c844c1a40bb68e90659c07,
title = "Aliens in Antarctica: Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk",
abstract = "Despite considerable research on biological invasions, key areas remain poorly explored, especially ways to reduce unintentional propagule transfer. The Antarctic represents a microcosm of the situation, with the numbers of established non-native species growing. Information to help reduce potential impacts is therefore critical. We measured the propagule load of seeds, and fragments of bryophytes and lichens (the number of other plant or animal fragments was too low to draw any conclusions) carried in the clothing and gear of visitors to the Antarctic, during the 2007/08 austral summer. Samples were collected from different categories of visitors associated with national research programs and tourism and different categories of clothing and gear, new as well as used. We also collected information about the timing of travel and the regions visitors had travelled to prior to Antarctic travel. Seeds were found in 20{\%} and 45{\%} of tourist and science visitor samples, respectively. For bryophyte and lichen fragments the proportions were 11{\%} and 20{\%}, respectively. Footwear, trousers and bags belonging to field scientists were the highest risk items, especially of those personnel which had previously visited protected areas, parklands/botanic gardens or alpine areas. Tourists who visited rural/agricultural areas prior to travel, and/or travel with national programs or on smaller tourist vessels had the highest probability of transferring plant propagules. Travel either during the boreal or austral autumn months increased the probability of propagule presence. Our assessment is applicable to other areas given evidence of propagule transfer patterns in those areas that are broadly similar to those documented here.The current work provides a sound evidence base for both self-regulation (e.g. taking care of personal equipment) and organization-based regulation (e.g. issuing guidelines and holding regular inspections) to reduce propagule transfer of plants to the Antarctic.",
keywords = "Biological invasions, Propagule pressure, Risk assessment, Self-assessment, Tourism, Vessel size",
author = "Huiskes, {Ad H.L.} and Gremmen, {Niek J.M.} and Bergstrom, {Dana M.} and Yves Frenot and Hughes, {Kevin A.} and Satoshi Imura and Kate Kiefer and Marc Lebouvier and Lee, {Jennifer E.} and Megumu Tsujimoto and Chris Ware and {Van de Vijver}, Bart and Chown, {Steven L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.038",
language = "English",
volume = "171",
pages = "278--284",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aliens in Antarctica

T2 - Assessing transfer of plant propagules by human visitors to reduce invasion risk

AU - Huiskes, Ad H.L.

AU - Gremmen, Niek J.M.

AU - Bergstrom, Dana M.

AU - Frenot, Yves

AU - Hughes, Kevin A.

AU - Imura, Satoshi

AU - Kiefer, Kate

AU - Lebouvier, Marc

AU - Lee, Jennifer E.

AU - Tsujimoto, Megumu

AU - Ware, Chris

AU - Van de Vijver, Bart

AU - Chown, Steven L.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Despite considerable research on biological invasions, key areas remain poorly explored, especially ways to reduce unintentional propagule transfer. The Antarctic represents a microcosm of the situation, with the numbers of established non-native species growing. Information to help reduce potential impacts is therefore critical. We measured the propagule load of seeds, and fragments of bryophytes and lichens (the number of other plant or animal fragments was too low to draw any conclusions) carried in the clothing and gear of visitors to the Antarctic, during the 2007/08 austral summer. Samples were collected from different categories of visitors associated with national research programs and tourism and different categories of clothing and gear, new as well as used. We also collected information about the timing of travel and the regions visitors had travelled to prior to Antarctic travel. Seeds were found in 20% and 45% of tourist and science visitor samples, respectively. For bryophyte and lichen fragments the proportions were 11% and 20%, respectively. Footwear, trousers and bags belonging to field scientists were the highest risk items, especially of those personnel which had previously visited protected areas, parklands/botanic gardens or alpine areas. Tourists who visited rural/agricultural areas prior to travel, and/or travel with national programs or on smaller tourist vessels had the highest probability of transferring plant propagules. Travel either during the boreal or austral autumn months increased the probability of propagule presence. Our assessment is applicable to other areas given evidence of propagule transfer patterns in those areas that are broadly similar to those documented here.The current work provides a sound evidence base for both self-regulation (e.g. taking care of personal equipment) and organization-based regulation (e.g. issuing guidelines and holding regular inspections) to reduce propagule transfer of plants to the Antarctic.

AB - Despite considerable research on biological invasions, key areas remain poorly explored, especially ways to reduce unintentional propagule transfer. The Antarctic represents a microcosm of the situation, with the numbers of established non-native species growing. Information to help reduce potential impacts is therefore critical. We measured the propagule load of seeds, and fragments of bryophytes and lichens (the number of other plant or animal fragments was too low to draw any conclusions) carried in the clothing and gear of visitors to the Antarctic, during the 2007/08 austral summer. Samples were collected from different categories of visitors associated with national research programs and tourism and different categories of clothing and gear, new as well as used. We also collected information about the timing of travel and the regions visitors had travelled to prior to Antarctic travel. Seeds were found in 20% and 45% of tourist and science visitor samples, respectively. For bryophyte and lichen fragments the proportions were 11% and 20%, respectively. Footwear, trousers and bags belonging to field scientists were the highest risk items, especially of those personnel which had previously visited protected areas, parklands/botanic gardens or alpine areas. Tourists who visited rural/agricultural areas prior to travel, and/or travel with national programs or on smaller tourist vessels had the highest probability of transferring plant propagules. Travel either during the boreal or austral autumn months increased the probability of propagule presence. Our assessment is applicable to other areas given evidence of propagule transfer patterns in those areas that are broadly similar to those documented here.The current work provides a sound evidence base for both self-regulation (e.g. taking care of personal equipment) and organization-based regulation (e.g. issuing guidelines and holding regular inspections) to reduce propagule transfer of plants to the Antarctic.

KW - Biological invasions

KW - Propagule pressure

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Self-assessment

KW - Tourism

KW - Vessel size

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897610596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897610596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.038

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.038

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 278

EP - 284

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -