Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

Kazuichi Okazaki, Shigeyuki Kawa, Terumi Kamisawa, Tetsuhide Ito, Kazuo Inui, Hiroyuki Irie, Takayoshi Nishino, Kenji Notohara, Isao Nishimori, Shigeki Tanaka, Toshimasa Nishiyama, Koichi Suda, Keiko Shiratori, Masao Tanaka, Tooru Shimosegawa, Keishi Kubo, Hirotaka Ohara, Atsushi Irisawa, Yasunari Fujinaga, Osamu HasebeHiroshi Yamamoto, Kazushige Uchida, Atsushi Kanno, Kensuke Kubota, Shigeru Ko, Junichi Sakagami, Kyoko Shimizu, Masanori Sugiyama, Minoru Tada, Takahiro Nakazawa, Hirokazu Nishino, Hideaki Hamano, Yoshiki Hirooka, Kenji Hirano, Atsushi Masamune, Atsuhiro Masuda, Nobumasa Mizuno, Koji Yamaguchi, Hitoshi Yoshida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision. Methods: Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. Results: The professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment. Conclusion: After evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-588
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Pancreatitis
Guidelines
Differential Diagnosis
Databases

Keywords

  • Autoimmune pancreatitis
  • Delphi method
  • Diagnosis
  • Guideline
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. / Okazaki, Kazuichi; Kawa, Shigeyuki; Kamisawa, Terumi; Ito, Tetsuhide; Inui, Kazuo; Irie, Hiroyuki; Nishino, Takayoshi; Notohara, Kenji; Nishimori, Isao; Tanaka, Shigeki; Nishiyama, Toshimasa; Suda, Koichi; Shiratori, Keiko; Tanaka, Masao; Shimosegawa, Tooru; Kubo, Keishi; Ohara, Hirotaka; Irisawa, Atsushi; Fujinaga, Yasunari; Hasebe, Osamu; Yamamoto, Hiroshi; Uchida, Kazushige; Kanno, Atsushi; Kubota, Kensuke; Ko, Shigeru; Sakagami, Junichi; Shimizu, Kyoko; Sugiyama, Masanori; Tada, Minoru; Nakazawa, Takahiro; Nishino, Hirokazu; Hamano, Hideaki; Hirooka, Yoshiki; Hirano, Kenji; Masamune, Atsushi; Masuda, Atsuhiro; Mizuno, Nobumasa; Yamaguchi, Koji; Yoshida, Hitoshi.

In: Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2014, p. 567-588.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Okazaki, K, Kawa, S, Kamisawa, T, Ito, T, Inui, K, Irie, H, Nishino, T, Notohara, K, Nishimori, I, Tanaka, S, Nishiyama, T, Suda, K, Shiratori, K, Tanaka, M, Shimosegawa, T, Kubo, K, Ohara, H, Irisawa, A, Fujinaga, Y, Hasebe, O, Yamamoto, H, Uchida, K, Kanno, A, Kubota, K, Ko, S, Sakagami, J, Shimizu, K, Sugiyama, M, Tada, M, Nakazawa, T, Nishino, H, Hamano, H, Hirooka, Y, Hirano, K, Masamune, A, Masuda, A, Mizuno, N, Yamaguchi, K & Yoshida, H 2014, 'Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis', Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 567-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-014-0942-2
Okazaki, Kazuichi ; Kawa, Shigeyuki ; Kamisawa, Terumi ; Ito, Tetsuhide ; Inui, Kazuo ; Irie, Hiroyuki ; Nishino, Takayoshi ; Notohara, Kenji ; Nishimori, Isao ; Tanaka, Shigeki ; Nishiyama, Toshimasa ; Suda, Koichi ; Shiratori, Keiko ; Tanaka, Masao ; Shimosegawa, Tooru ; Kubo, Keishi ; Ohara, Hirotaka ; Irisawa, Atsushi ; Fujinaga, Yasunari ; Hasebe, Osamu ; Yamamoto, Hiroshi ; Uchida, Kazushige ; Kanno, Atsushi ; Kubota, Kensuke ; Ko, Shigeru ; Sakagami, Junichi ; Shimizu, Kyoko ; Sugiyama, Masanori ; Tada, Minoru ; Nakazawa, Takahiro ; Nishino, Hirokazu ; Hamano, Hideaki ; Hirooka, Yoshiki ; Hirano, Kenji ; Masamune, Atsushi ; Masuda, Atsuhiro ; Mizuno, Nobumasa ; Yamaguchi, Koji ; Yoshida, Hitoshi. / Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. In: Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 567-588.
@article{aca702ede73e4709850dca9660471f60,
title = "Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis",
abstract = "Background: In response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision. Methods: Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. Results: The professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment. Conclusion: After evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.",
keywords = "Autoimmune pancreatitis, Delphi method, Diagnosis, Guideline, Treatment",
author = "Kazuichi Okazaki and Shigeyuki Kawa and Terumi Kamisawa and Tetsuhide Ito and Kazuo Inui and Hiroyuki Irie and Takayoshi Nishino and Kenji Notohara and Isao Nishimori and Shigeki Tanaka and Toshimasa Nishiyama and Koichi Suda and Keiko Shiratori and Masao Tanaka and Tooru Shimosegawa and Keishi Kubo and Hirotaka Ohara and Atsushi Irisawa and Yasunari Fujinaga and Osamu Hasebe and Hiroshi Yamamoto and Kazushige Uchida and Atsushi Kanno and Kensuke Kubota and Shigeru Ko and Junichi Sakagami and Kyoko Shimizu and Masanori Sugiyama and Minoru Tada and Takahiro Nakazawa and Hirokazu Nishino and Hideaki Hamano and Yoshiki Hirooka and Kenji Hirano and Atsushi Masamune and Atsuhiro Masuda and Nobumasa Mizuno and Koji Yamaguchi and Hitoshi Yoshida",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00535-014-0942-2",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "567--588",
journal = "Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0944-1174",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

AU - Okazaki, Kazuichi

AU - Kawa, Shigeyuki

AU - Kamisawa, Terumi

AU - Ito, Tetsuhide

AU - Inui, Kazuo

AU - Irie, Hiroyuki

AU - Nishino, Takayoshi

AU - Notohara, Kenji

AU - Nishimori, Isao

AU - Tanaka, Shigeki

AU - Nishiyama, Toshimasa

AU - Suda, Koichi

AU - Shiratori, Keiko

AU - Tanaka, Masao

AU - Shimosegawa, Tooru

AU - Kubo, Keishi

AU - Ohara, Hirotaka

AU - Irisawa, Atsushi

AU - Fujinaga, Yasunari

AU - Hasebe, Osamu

AU - Yamamoto, Hiroshi

AU - Uchida, Kazushige

AU - Kanno, Atsushi

AU - Kubota, Kensuke

AU - Ko, Shigeru

AU - Sakagami, Junichi

AU - Shimizu, Kyoko

AU - Sugiyama, Masanori

AU - Tada, Minoru

AU - Nakazawa, Takahiro

AU - Nishino, Hirokazu

AU - Hamano, Hideaki

AU - Hirooka, Yoshiki

AU - Hirano, Kenji

AU - Masamune, Atsushi

AU - Masuda, Atsuhiro

AU - Mizuno, Nobumasa

AU - Yamaguchi, Koji

AU - Yoshida, Hitoshi

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: In response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision. Methods: Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. Results: The professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment. Conclusion: After evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.

AB - Background: In response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision. Methods: Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. Results: The professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment. Conclusion: After evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.

KW - Autoimmune pancreatitis

KW - Delphi method

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Guideline

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899919016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899919016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00535-014-0942-2

DO - 10.1007/s00535-014-0942-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 24639057

AN - SCOPUS:84899919016

VL - 49

SP - 567

EP - 588

JO - Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0944-1174

IS - 4

ER -