Analysis of interdiffusion between SmFeAsO0.92F0.08 and metals for exsitu fabrication of superconducting wire

M. Fujioka, M. Matoba, T. Ozaki, Y. Takano, H. Kumakura, Y. Kamihara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To find good sheath materials that react minimally with the superconducting core of iron-based superconducting wires, we investigated the reaction between polycrystalline SmFeAsO0.92F0.08 and the following seven metals: Cu, Fe, Ni, Ta, Nb, Cr and Ti. Each of the seven metals was prepared as a sheath-material candidate. The interfacial microstructures of SmFeAsO 0.92F0.08 and these metal-sheath samples were analysed by an electron probe microanalyzer after annealing at 1000 °C for 20h. Amongst the seven metal-sheath samples, we found that Cu was the best, because it reacted only very weakly with polycrystalline SmFeAsO0.92F 0.08. Moreover, Cu is essential for superconducting wires as a stabilizing material. Metal sheaths made of Fe and Ni do not give rise to reaction layers, but large interdiffusion between these metals and polycrystalline SmFeAsO0.92F0.08 occurs. In contrast, metal sheaths made of Ta, Nb, Cr and Ti do form reaction layers. Their reaction layers apparently prevent electric current from flowing from the sheath material to the superconducting core. In general, through this research, Cu will be expected to be suitable not only as a stabilizing material but also as a sheath material for superconducting Sm-1111 wire fabricated by the exsitu PIT method.

Original languageEnglish
Article number075024
JournalSuperconductor Science and Technology
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jul

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Metals and Alloys
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of interdiffusion between SmFeAsO0.92F0.08 and metals for exsitu fabrication of superconducting wire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this