Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against cell lines generated by liver-specific idiotype-bearing antibody

Tatehiro Kagawa, Hidetsugu Saito, Toshio Morizane, Kanji Tsuchimoto, Yasutaka Inagaki, Kentaro Sawaguchi, Naoto Iwabuchi, Naoki Kumagai, Masaharu Tsuchiya, Hiromasa Ishii

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We produced a murine monoclonal antibody (mAb), designated H2-mAb, against a fractionated soluble phase of human liver homogenate which antibody reacted with human liver cells. A human antibody possessing the same idiotype as the H2-mAb, designated LSIA (liver-specific idiotype-bearing antibody), can be measured by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using the anti-H2 idiotype antibody. The serum level of LSIA in patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis (CH) was significantly higher than that in healthy subjects and it was also higher than that in subjects with other diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus. In a comparison between patients with CH type B and those with CH type C, there was no significant difference in serum levels of LSIA. It was possible to purify LSIA from the sera of patients with CH. The purified LSIA bound to the human cell lines Chang and HCC-M, derived from liver cells and a hepatoma respectively, but not to HeLa cells, a uterine carcinoma derivative. The reactivity of this mAb to HCC-M was weaker than that to Change. Moreover, the presence of LSIA caused an antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxic challenge against Change cells in vitro.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-208
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of gastroenterology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1995 Apr


  • cell lines
  • chronic hepatitis
  • liver-specific idiotype-bearing antibody
  • monoclonal antibody

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against cell lines generated by liver-specific idiotype-bearing antibody'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this