Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement

Akizumi Tsutsumi, Noboru Iwata, Naotaka Watanabe, Jan De Jonge, Hynek Pikhart, Juan Antonio Fernández-López, Liying Xu, Richard Peter, Anders Knutsson, Isabelle Niedhammer, Norito Kawakami, Johannes Siegrist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-67
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Reward
Nurses' Aides
Railroads
Telephone
Gases
Nurses

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural comparison
  • Differential item functioning
  • Differential test functioning
  • Item response theory
  • Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Tsutsumi, A., Iwata, N., Watanabe, N., De Jonge, J., Pikhart, H., Fernández-López, J. A., ... Siegrist, J. (2009). Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.277

Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement. / Tsutsumi, Akizumi; Iwata, Noboru; Watanabe, Naotaka; De Jonge, Jan; Pikhart, Hynek; Fernández-López, Juan Antonio; Xu, Liying; Peter, Richard; Knutsson, Anders; Niedhammer, Isabelle; Kawakami, Norito; Siegrist, Johannes.

In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2009, p. 58-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsutsumi, A, Iwata, N, Watanabe, N, De Jonge, J, Pikhart, H, Fernández-López, JA, Xu, L, Peter, R, Knutsson, A, Niedhammer, I, Kawakami, N & Siegrist, J 2009, 'Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement', International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.277
Tsutsumi, Akizumi ; Iwata, Noboru ; Watanabe, Naotaka ; De Jonge, Jan ; Pikhart, Hynek ; Fernández-López, Juan Antonio ; Xu, Liying ; Peter, Richard ; Knutsson, Anders ; Niedhammer, Isabelle ; Kawakami, Norito ; Siegrist, Johannes. / Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement. In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 58-67.
@article{8c4450b6b0324b6381beecd315fef068,
title = "Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement",
abstract = "Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural comparison, Differential item functioning, Differential test functioning, Item response theory, Stress",
author = "Akizumi Tsutsumi and Noboru Iwata and Naotaka Watanabe and {De Jonge}, Jan and Hynek Pikhart and Fern{\'a}ndez-L{\'o}pez, {Juan Antonio} and Liying Xu and Richard Peter and Anders Knutsson and Isabelle Niedhammer and Norito Kawakami and Johannes Siegrist",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1002/mpr.277",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "58--67",
journal = "International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research",
issn = "1049-8931",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement

AU - Tsutsumi, Akizumi

AU - Iwata, Noboru

AU - Watanabe, Naotaka

AU - De Jonge, Jan

AU - Pikhart, Hynek

AU - Fernández-López, Juan Antonio

AU - Xu, Liying

AU - Peter, Richard

AU - Knutsson, Anders

AU - Niedhammer, Isabelle

AU - Kawakami, Norito

AU - Siegrist, Johannes

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.

AB - Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.

KW - Cross-cultural comparison

KW - Differential item functioning

KW - Differential test functioning

KW - Item response theory

KW - Stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64749088612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64749088612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mpr.277

DO - 10.1002/mpr.277

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 58

EP - 67

JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

SN - 1049-8931

IS - 1

ER -