Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium: the meta-analytical evidence

Tim S. Nawrot, Dries S. Martens, Azusa Hara, Michelle Plusquin, Jaco Vangronsveld, Harry A. Roels, Jan A. Staessen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent studies are indicative of substantial progress in understanding the dose–response relation between the incidence of total and lung cancer and environmental cadmium exposure. We conducted a meta-analysis of population studies that examined the risk of cancer in relation to lifetime exposure to cadmium. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and relevant reviews until August 2014 for studies on the association between cancer risk and cadmium exposure. Eligible studies had to include an estimate of lifetime exposure to cadmium as reflected by the urinary cadmium concentration and adjustment of the cancer risk at least for age and smoking. We pooled relative risk across the studies estimates for cancer and lung cancer using variance-weighted random-effect models and expressed association sizes for a twofold increase in urinary cadmium, thereby respecting the continuous nature of the association. Results: The meta-analysis included 20,459 participants from three prospective population studies. The average urinary cadmium concentration across populations ranged from 0.25 to 0.93 µg/g creatinine. The relative risk of total cancer, associated with a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, ranged across the different studies from 1.18 to 1.31, and the pooled relative risk was 1.22 (95 % CI 1.13–1.31; p < 0.0001). For lung cancer, the relative risk ranged from 1.21 to 1.70 for a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, while the pooled relative risk amounted to 1.68 (1.47–1.92; p < 0.0001). Excluding one study at the time did not move the pooled estimates outside the confidence interval of the overall estimate for all studies combined. Conclusion: The epidemiological evidence of the last decade consistently identifies low-level environmental exposure to cadmium as a risk factor for total cancer and lung cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1281-1288
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Sep 21
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Environmental Exposure
Cadmium
Lung Neoplasms
Meta-Analysis
Neoplasms
Population
Risk Adjustment
MEDLINE
Creatinine
Smoking
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cadmium
  • Cancer
  • Epidemiology
  • Lung cancer
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium : the meta-analytical evidence. / Nawrot, Tim S.; Martens, Dries S.; Hara, Azusa; Plusquin, Michelle; Vangronsveld, Jaco; Roels, Harry A.; Staessen, Jan A.

In: Cancer Causes and Control, Vol. 26, No. 9, 21.09.2015, p. 1281-1288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nawrot, Tim S. ; Martens, Dries S. ; Hara, Azusa ; Plusquin, Michelle ; Vangronsveld, Jaco ; Roels, Harry A. ; Staessen, Jan A. / Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium : the meta-analytical evidence. In: Cancer Causes and Control. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 9. pp. 1281-1288.
@article{4835255b05654dcea7b292d766253c79,
title = "Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium: the meta-analytical evidence",
abstract = "Background: Recent studies are indicative of substantial progress in understanding the dose–response relation between the incidence of total and lung cancer and environmental cadmium exposure. We conducted a meta-analysis of population studies that examined the risk of cancer in relation to lifetime exposure to cadmium. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and relevant reviews until August 2014 for studies on the association between cancer risk and cadmium exposure. Eligible studies had to include an estimate of lifetime exposure to cadmium as reflected by the urinary cadmium concentration and adjustment of the cancer risk at least for age and smoking. We pooled relative risk across the studies estimates for cancer and lung cancer using variance-weighted random-effect models and expressed association sizes for a twofold increase in urinary cadmium, thereby respecting the continuous nature of the association. Results: The meta-analysis included 20,459 participants from three prospective population studies. The average urinary cadmium concentration across populations ranged from 0.25 to 0.93 µg/g creatinine. The relative risk of total cancer, associated with a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, ranged across the different studies from 1.18 to 1.31, and the pooled relative risk was 1.22 (95 {\%} CI 1.13–1.31; p < 0.0001). For lung cancer, the relative risk ranged from 1.21 to 1.70 for a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, while the pooled relative risk amounted to 1.68 (1.47–1.92; p < 0.0001). Excluding one study at the time did not move the pooled estimates outside the confidence interval of the overall estimate for all studies combined. Conclusion: The epidemiological evidence of the last decade consistently identifies low-level environmental exposure to cadmium as a risk factor for total cancer and lung cancer.",
keywords = "Cadmium, Cancer, Epidemiology, Lung cancer, Meta-analysis",
author = "Nawrot, {Tim S.} and Martens, {Dries S.} and Azusa Hara and Michelle Plusquin and Jaco Vangronsveld and Roels, {Harry A.} and Staessen, {Jan A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s10552-015-0621-5",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1281--1288",
journal = "Cancer Causes and Control",
issn = "0957-5243",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium

T2 - the meta-analytical evidence

AU - Nawrot, Tim S.

AU - Martens, Dries S.

AU - Hara, Azusa

AU - Plusquin, Michelle

AU - Vangronsveld, Jaco

AU - Roels, Harry A.

AU - Staessen, Jan A.

PY - 2015/9/21

Y1 - 2015/9/21

N2 - Background: Recent studies are indicative of substantial progress in understanding the dose–response relation between the incidence of total and lung cancer and environmental cadmium exposure. We conducted a meta-analysis of population studies that examined the risk of cancer in relation to lifetime exposure to cadmium. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and relevant reviews until August 2014 for studies on the association between cancer risk and cadmium exposure. Eligible studies had to include an estimate of lifetime exposure to cadmium as reflected by the urinary cadmium concentration and adjustment of the cancer risk at least for age and smoking. We pooled relative risk across the studies estimates for cancer and lung cancer using variance-weighted random-effect models and expressed association sizes for a twofold increase in urinary cadmium, thereby respecting the continuous nature of the association. Results: The meta-analysis included 20,459 participants from three prospective population studies. The average urinary cadmium concentration across populations ranged from 0.25 to 0.93 µg/g creatinine. The relative risk of total cancer, associated with a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, ranged across the different studies from 1.18 to 1.31, and the pooled relative risk was 1.22 (95 % CI 1.13–1.31; p < 0.0001). For lung cancer, the relative risk ranged from 1.21 to 1.70 for a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, while the pooled relative risk amounted to 1.68 (1.47–1.92; p < 0.0001). Excluding one study at the time did not move the pooled estimates outside the confidence interval of the overall estimate for all studies combined. Conclusion: The epidemiological evidence of the last decade consistently identifies low-level environmental exposure to cadmium as a risk factor for total cancer and lung cancer.

AB - Background: Recent studies are indicative of substantial progress in understanding the dose–response relation between the incidence of total and lung cancer and environmental cadmium exposure. We conducted a meta-analysis of population studies that examined the risk of cancer in relation to lifetime exposure to cadmium. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and relevant reviews until August 2014 for studies on the association between cancer risk and cadmium exposure. Eligible studies had to include an estimate of lifetime exposure to cadmium as reflected by the urinary cadmium concentration and adjustment of the cancer risk at least for age and smoking. We pooled relative risk across the studies estimates for cancer and lung cancer using variance-weighted random-effect models and expressed association sizes for a twofold increase in urinary cadmium, thereby respecting the continuous nature of the association. Results: The meta-analysis included 20,459 participants from three prospective population studies. The average urinary cadmium concentration across populations ranged from 0.25 to 0.93 µg/g creatinine. The relative risk of total cancer, associated with a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, ranged across the different studies from 1.18 to 1.31, and the pooled relative risk was 1.22 (95 % CI 1.13–1.31; p < 0.0001). For lung cancer, the relative risk ranged from 1.21 to 1.70 for a doubling of the urinary cadmium concentration, while the pooled relative risk amounted to 1.68 (1.47–1.92; p < 0.0001). Excluding one study at the time did not move the pooled estimates outside the confidence interval of the overall estimate for all studies combined. Conclusion: The epidemiological evidence of the last decade consistently identifies low-level environmental exposure to cadmium as a risk factor for total cancer and lung cancer.

KW - Cadmium

KW - Cancer

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943207553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943207553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10552-015-0621-5

DO - 10.1007/s10552-015-0621-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 26109463

AN - SCOPUS:84943207553

VL - 26

SP - 1281

EP - 1288

JO - Cancer Causes and Control

JF - Cancer Causes and Control

SN - 0957-5243

IS - 9

ER -