Attitude of young psychiatrists toward coercive measures in psychiatry

A case vignette study in Japan

Masaru Tateno, Kanna Sugiura, Kumi Uehara, Daisuke Fujisawa, Yueren Zhao, Naoki Hashimoto, Hidehiko Takahashi, Naofumi Yoshida, Takahiro Kato, Wakako Nakano, Yosuke Wake, Tomohiro Shirasaka, Seiju Kobayashi, Soichiro Sato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Every psychiatrist must pay careful attention to avoid violating human rights when initiating coercive treatments such as seclusion and restraint. However, these interventions are indispensable in clinical psychiatry, and they are often used as strategies to treat agitated patients. In this study, we investigated young psychiatrists' attitudes toward psychiatric coercive measures.Methods: A total of 183 young psychiatrists participated as subjects in our study. A questionnaire with a case vignette describing a patient with acute psychosis was sent to the study subjects via the Internet or by mail. This questionnaire included scoring the necessity for hospitalization, and the likelihood of prescribing seclusion and/or restraint, on a 9-point Likert scale (with 9 indicating strong agreement).Results: There was general agreement among the study subjects that the case should be admitted to a hospital (8.91 ± 0.3) and secluded (8.43 ± 1.0). The estimated length of hospitalization was 13.53 ± 6.4 weeks. Regarding the likelihood of prescribing restraint, results showed great diversity (5.14 ± 2.5 on 9-point scale); psychiatrists working at general hospitals scored significantly higher (6.25 ± 2.5) than those working at university hospitals (5.02 ± 2.3) or psychiatric hospitals (4.15 ± 2.6). A two-group comparison of the length of inpatient care revealed a significant difference between those psychiatrists who scored 1-3 (n = 55, 14.22 ± 7.4 wks) and those who scored 7-9 (n = 62, 12.22 ± 4.0) regarding the need to use restraint.Conclusion: Our results may reflect the current dilemma in Japanese psychiatry wherein psychiatrists must initiate coercive measures to shorten hospitalization stays. This study prompted its subject psychiatrists to consider coercive psychiatric treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20
JournalInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 22

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Japan
Hospitalization
Psychiatric Hospitals
Postal Service
General Hospitals
Internet
Psychotic Disorders
Inpatients
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Phychiatric Mental Health

Cite this

Attitude of young psychiatrists toward coercive measures in psychiatry : A case vignette study in Japan. / Tateno, Masaru; Sugiura, Kanna; Uehara, Kumi; Fujisawa, Daisuke; Zhao, Yueren; Hashimoto, Naoki; Takahashi, Hidehiko; Yoshida, Naofumi; Kato, Takahiro; Nakano, Wakako; Wake, Yosuke; Shirasaka, Tomohiro; Kobayashi, Seiju; Sato, Soichiro.

In: International Journal of Mental Health Systems, Vol. 3, 20, 22.09.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tateno, M, Sugiura, K, Uehara, K, Fujisawa, D, Zhao, Y, Hashimoto, N, Takahashi, H, Yoshida, N, Kato, T, Nakano, W, Wake, Y, Shirasaka, T, Kobayashi, S & Sato, S 2009, 'Attitude of young psychiatrists toward coercive measures in psychiatry: A case vignette study in Japan', International Journal of Mental Health Systems, vol. 3, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-3-20
Tateno, Masaru ; Sugiura, Kanna ; Uehara, Kumi ; Fujisawa, Daisuke ; Zhao, Yueren ; Hashimoto, Naoki ; Takahashi, Hidehiko ; Yoshida, Naofumi ; Kato, Takahiro ; Nakano, Wakako ; Wake, Yosuke ; Shirasaka, Tomohiro ; Kobayashi, Seiju ; Sato, Soichiro. / Attitude of young psychiatrists toward coercive measures in psychiatry : A case vignette study in Japan. In: International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 2009 ; Vol. 3.
@article{0ce8c723a2fa411dbf697b9be6eaad2b,
title = "Attitude of young psychiatrists toward coercive measures in psychiatry: A case vignette study in Japan",
abstract = "Background: Every psychiatrist must pay careful attention to avoid violating human rights when initiating coercive treatments such as seclusion and restraint. However, these interventions are indispensable in clinical psychiatry, and they are often used as strategies to treat agitated patients. In this study, we investigated young psychiatrists' attitudes toward psychiatric coercive measures.Methods: A total of 183 young psychiatrists participated as subjects in our study. A questionnaire with a case vignette describing a patient with acute psychosis was sent to the study subjects via the Internet or by mail. This questionnaire included scoring the necessity for hospitalization, and the likelihood of prescribing seclusion and/or restraint, on a 9-point Likert scale (with 9 indicating strong agreement).Results: There was general agreement among the study subjects that the case should be admitted to a hospital (8.91 ± 0.3) and secluded (8.43 ± 1.0). The estimated length of hospitalization was 13.53 ± 6.4 weeks. Regarding the likelihood of prescribing restraint, results showed great diversity (5.14 ± 2.5 on 9-point scale); psychiatrists working at general hospitals scored significantly higher (6.25 ± 2.5) than those working at university hospitals (5.02 ± 2.3) or psychiatric hospitals (4.15 ± 2.6). A two-group comparison of the length of inpatient care revealed a significant difference between those psychiatrists who scored 1-3 (n = 55, 14.22 ± 7.4 wks) and those who scored 7-9 (n = 62, 12.22 ± 4.0) regarding the need to use restraint.Conclusion: Our results may reflect the current dilemma in Japanese psychiatry wherein psychiatrists must initiate coercive measures to shorten hospitalization stays. This study prompted its subject psychiatrists to consider coercive psychiatric treatments.",
author = "Masaru Tateno and Kanna Sugiura and Kumi Uehara and Daisuke Fujisawa and Yueren Zhao and Naoki Hashimoto and Hidehiko Takahashi and Naofumi Yoshida and Takahiro Kato and Wakako Nakano and Yosuke Wake and Tomohiro Shirasaka and Seiju Kobayashi and Soichiro Sato",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/1752-4458-3-20",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "International Journal of Mental Health Systems",
issn = "1752-4458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitude of young psychiatrists toward coercive measures in psychiatry

T2 - A case vignette study in Japan

AU - Tateno, Masaru

AU - Sugiura, Kanna

AU - Uehara, Kumi

AU - Fujisawa, Daisuke

AU - Zhao, Yueren

AU - Hashimoto, Naoki

AU - Takahashi, Hidehiko

AU - Yoshida, Naofumi

AU - Kato, Takahiro

AU - Nakano, Wakako

AU - Wake, Yosuke

AU - Shirasaka, Tomohiro

AU - Kobayashi, Seiju

AU - Sato, Soichiro

PY - 2009/9/22

Y1 - 2009/9/22

N2 - Background: Every psychiatrist must pay careful attention to avoid violating human rights when initiating coercive treatments such as seclusion and restraint. However, these interventions are indispensable in clinical psychiatry, and they are often used as strategies to treat agitated patients. In this study, we investigated young psychiatrists' attitudes toward psychiatric coercive measures.Methods: A total of 183 young psychiatrists participated as subjects in our study. A questionnaire with a case vignette describing a patient with acute psychosis was sent to the study subjects via the Internet or by mail. This questionnaire included scoring the necessity for hospitalization, and the likelihood of prescribing seclusion and/or restraint, on a 9-point Likert scale (with 9 indicating strong agreement).Results: There was general agreement among the study subjects that the case should be admitted to a hospital (8.91 ± 0.3) and secluded (8.43 ± 1.0). The estimated length of hospitalization was 13.53 ± 6.4 weeks. Regarding the likelihood of prescribing restraint, results showed great diversity (5.14 ± 2.5 on 9-point scale); psychiatrists working at general hospitals scored significantly higher (6.25 ± 2.5) than those working at university hospitals (5.02 ± 2.3) or psychiatric hospitals (4.15 ± 2.6). A two-group comparison of the length of inpatient care revealed a significant difference between those psychiatrists who scored 1-3 (n = 55, 14.22 ± 7.4 wks) and those who scored 7-9 (n = 62, 12.22 ± 4.0) regarding the need to use restraint.Conclusion: Our results may reflect the current dilemma in Japanese psychiatry wherein psychiatrists must initiate coercive measures to shorten hospitalization stays. This study prompted its subject psychiatrists to consider coercive psychiatric treatments.

AB - Background: Every psychiatrist must pay careful attention to avoid violating human rights when initiating coercive treatments such as seclusion and restraint. However, these interventions are indispensable in clinical psychiatry, and they are often used as strategies to treat agitated patients. In this study, we investigated young psychiatrists' attitudes toward psychiatric coercive measures.Methods: A total of 183 young psychiatrists participated as subjects in our study. A questionnaire with a case vignette describing a patient with acute psychosis was sent to the study subjects via the Internet or by mail. This questionnaire included scoring the necessity for hospitalization, and the likelihood of prescribing seclusion and/or restraint, on a 9-point Likert scale (with 9 indicating strong agreement).Results: There was general agreement among the study subjects that the case should be admitted to a hospital (8.91 ± 0.3) and secluded (8.43 ± 1.0). The estimated length of hospitalization was 13.53 ± 6.4 weeks. Regarding the likelihood of prescribing restraint, results showed great diversity (5.14 ± 2.5 on 9-point scale); psychiatrists working at general hospitals scored significantly higher (6.25 ± 2.5) than those working at university hospitals (5.02 ± 2.3) or psychiatric hospitals (4.15 ± 2.6). A two-group comparison of the length of inpatient care revealed a significant difference between those psychiatrists who scored 1-3 (n = 55, 14.22 ± 7.4 wks) and those who scored 7-9 (n = 62, 12.22 ± 4.0) regarding the need to use restraint.Conclusion: Our results may reflect the current dilemma in Japanese psychiatry wherein psychiatrists must initiate coercive measures to shorten hospitalization stays. This study prompted its subject psychiatrists to consider coercive psychiatric treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953290132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953290132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1752-4458-3-20

DO - 10.1186/1752-4458-3-20

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - International Journal of Mental Health Systems

JF - International Journal of Mental Health Systems

SN - 1752-4458

M1 - 20

ER -