Attitudes regarding reporting healthcare-associated patient deaths to the police: A nationwide survey of physicians and RMs in Japanese teaching hospitals

Shoichi Maeda, Etsuko Kamishiraki, Jay Starkey, Noriaki Ikeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In Japan, healthcare professionals are required by Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law to report "unnatural deaths" to the police in cases of healthcare-associated patient death. The attitudes of medical personnel at the forefront of clinical medicine regarding reporting have not been described. We investigate the attitudes of physicians and risk managers (RMs) regarding reporting to the police under different circumstances. We sent standardized questionnaires to all hospitals in Japan that participate in the National General Residency Program. We asked physicians and RMs to indicate if they would report to the police or not under scenarios including cases where medical error is present, uncertain, or absent. We also asked if they would report when medical error had occurred and the cause-of-death was directly related, possibly related, or unrelated. We found most physicians believe they would report to the police if medical error clearly caused patient death. We found most RMs believe they would advise physicians to report given the same situation. Less but still a large number of participants favor reporting even when cause-of-death is not clearly related to medical care provided. This tendency persisted even when given a scenario where the hospital director opposed the decision to report.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-299
Number of pages4
JournalLegal Medicine
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Nov

Fingerprint

Police
Teaching Hospitals
Medical Errors
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Cause of Death
Japan
Clinical Medicine
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law
  • Healthcare related death
  • Medical malpractice
  • Nationwide survey
  • Reporting to the police

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Attitudes regarding reporting healthcare-associated patient deaths to the police : A nationwide survey of physicians and RMs in Japanese teaching hospitals. / Maeda, Shoichi; Kamishiraki, Etsuko; Starkey, Jay; Ikeda, Noriaki.

In: Legal Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 296-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d46b4ba0af6439898bffd633c06660c,
title = "Attitudes regarding reporting healthcare-associated patient deaths to the police: A nationwide survey of physicians and RMs in Japanese teaching hospitals",
abstract = "In Japan, healthcare professionals are required by Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law to report {"}unnatural deaths{"} to the police in cases of healthcare-associated patient death. The attitudes of medical personnel at the forefront of clinical medicine regarding reporting have not been described. We investigate the attitudes of physicians and risk managers (RMs) regarding reporting to the police under different circumstances. We sent standardized questionnaires to all hospitals in Japan that participate in the National General Residency Program. We asked physicians and RMs to indicate if they would report to the police or not under scenarios including cases where medical error is present, uncertain, or absent. We also asked if they would report when medical error had occurred and the cause-of-death was directly related, possibly related, or unrelated. We found most physicians believe they would report to the police if medical error clearly caused patient death. We found most RMs believe they would advise physicians to report given the same situation. Less but still a large number of participants favor reporting even when cause-of-death is not clearly related to medical care provided. This tendency persisted even when given a scenario where the hospital director opposed the decision to report.",
keywords = "Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law, Healthcare related death, Medical malpractice, Nationwide survey, Reporting to the police",
author = "Shoichi Maeda and Etsuko Kamishiraki and Jay Starkey and Noriaki Ikeda",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "296--299",
journal = "Legal Medicine",
issn = "1344-6223",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes regarding reporting healthcare-associated patient deaths to the police

T2 - A nationwide survey of physicians and RMs in Japanese teaching hospitals

AU - Maeda, Shoichi

AU - Kamishiraki, Etsuko

AU - Starkey, Jay

AU - Ikeda, Noriaki

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - In Japan, healthcare professionals are required by Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law to report "unnatural deaths" to the police in cases of healthcare-associated patient death. The attitudes of medical personnel at the forefront of clinical medicine regarding reporting have not been described. We investigate the attitudes of physicians and risk managers (RMs) regarding reporting to the police under different circumstances. We sent standardized questionnaires to all hospitals in Japan that participate in the National General Residency Program. We asked physicians and RMs to indicate if they would report to the police or not under scenarios including cases where medical error is present, uncertain, or absent. We also asked if they would report when medical error had occurred and the cause-of-death was directly related, possibly related, or unrelated. We found most physicians believe they would report to the police if medical error clearly caused patient death. We found most RMs believe they would advise physicians to report given the same situation. Less but still a large number of participants favor reporting even when cause-of-death is not clearly related to medical care provided. This tendency persisted even when given a scenario where the hospital director opposed the decision to report.

AB - In Japan, healthcare professionals are required by Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law to report "unnatural deaths" to the police in cases of healthcare-associated patient death. The attitudes of medical personnel at the forefront of clinical medicine regarding reporting have not been described. We investigate the attitudes of physicians and risk managers (RMs) regarding reporting to the police under different circumstances. We sent standardized questionnaires to all hospitals in Japan that participate in the National General Residency Program. We asked physicians and RMs to indicate if they would report to the police or not under scenarios including cases where medical error is present, uncertain, or absent. We also asked if they would report when medical error had occurred and the cause-of-death was directly related, possibly related, or unrelated. We found most physicians believe they would report to the police if medical error clearly caused patient death. We found most RMs believe they would advise physicians to report given the same situation. Less but still a large number of participants favor reporting even when cause-of-death is not clearly related to medical care provided. This tendency persisted even when given a scenario where the hospital director opposed the decision to report.

KW - Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner's Law

KW - Healthcare related death

KW - Medical malpractice

KW - Nationwide survey

KW - Reporting to the police

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957270884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957270884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.08.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 20817591

AN - SCOPUS:77957270884

VL - 12

SP - 296

EP - 299

JO - Legal Medicine

JF - Legal Medicine

SN - 1344-6223

IS - 6

ER -