Attitudes toward clinical autopsy in unexpected patient deaths in Japan: A nation-wide survey of the general public and physicians

Etsuko Kamishiraki, Shoichi Maeda, Jay Starkey, Noriaki Ikeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the cause and manner of unexpected patient death. However, the attitudes of the general public and physicians in Japan about clinical autopsy are limited. Objective: To describe the beliefs of the general public about whether autopsy should be performed and ascertain if they would actually request one given specific clinical situations where patient death occurred with the additional variable of medical error. To compare these attitudes with previously obtained attitudes of physicians practising at Japanese teaching hospitals. Design, setting and participants: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the general public. We sent standardised questionnaires in 2010 to a randomly selected non-physician adult population using a survey company for participant selection. Respondents gave their opinions about the necessity of autopsy and how they might act given various clinical scenarios of patient death. We compared these results with those of a previous survey of Japanese physicians conducted in 2009. Results: Of the 2300 eligible general adult population, 1575 (68.5%) responded. The majority of the general public indicated they believed an autopsy was necessary. However, in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death, the general public were much less likely to indicate they would actually request an autopsy than were physicians (p<0.0001). Currently in Japan the debate about the role autopsy should play in the case of error related to death is underway. The results from this study will be important in informing related decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-741
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume38
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec

Fingerprint

Autopsy
Japan
physician
death
Physicians
Medical Errors
cause
cross-sectional study
medical care
Surveys and Questionnaires
General Public
Teaching Hospitals
scenario
Population
Patient Care
questionnaire
Cross-Sectional Studies
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Attitudes toward clinical autopsy in unexpected patient deaths in Japan : A nation-wide survey of the general public and physicians. / Kamishiraki, Etsuko; Maeda, Shoichi; Starkey, Jay; Ikeda, Noriaki.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 38, No. 12, 12.2012, p. 735-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b35ef3039f44acf9d316e6af30eee52,
title = "Attitudes toward clinical autopsy in unexpected patient deaths in Japan: A nation-wide survey of the general public and physicians",
abstract = "Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the cause and manner of unexpected patient death. However, the attitudes of the general public and physicians in Japan about clinical autopsy are limited. Objective: To describe the beliefs of the general public about whether autopsy should be performed and ascertain if they would actually request one given specific clinical situations where patient death occurred with the additional variable of medical error. To compare these attitudes with previously obtained attitudes of physicians practising at Japanese teaching hospitals. Design, setting and participants: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the general public. We sent standardised questionnaires in 2010 to a randomly selected non-physician adult population using a survey company for participant selection. Respondents gave their opinions about the necessity of autopsy and how they might act given various clinical scenarios of patient death. We compared these results with those of a previous survey of Japanese physicians conducted in 2009. Results: Of the 2300 eligible general adult population, 1575 (68.5{\%}) responded. The majority of the general public indicated they believed an autopsy was necessary. However, in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death, the general public were much less likely to indicate they would actually request an autopsy than were physicians (p<0.0001). Currently in Japan the debate about the role autopsy should play in the case of error related to death is underway. The results from this study will be important in informing related decisions.",
author = "Etsuko Kamishiraki and Shoichi Maeda and Jay Starkey and Noriaki Ikeda",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2012-100855",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "735--741",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes toward clinical autopsy in unexpected patient deaths in Japan

T2 - A nation-wide survey of the general public and physicians

AU - Kamishiraki, Etsuko

AU - Maeda, Shoichi

AU - Starkey, Jay

AU - Ikeda, Noriaki

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the cause and manner of unexpected patient death. However, the attitudes of the general public and physicians in Japan about clinical autopsy are limited. Objective: To describe the beliefs of the general public about whether autopsy should be performed and ascertain if they would actually request one given specific clinical situations where patient death occurred with the additional variable of medical error. To compare these attitudes with previously obtained attitudes of physicians practising at Japanese teaching hospitals. Design, setting and participants: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the general public. We sent standardised questionnaires in 2010 to a randomly selected non-physician adult population using a survey company for participant selection. Respondents gave their opinions about the necessity of autopsy and how they might act given various clinical scenarios of patient death. We compared these results with those of a previous survey of Japanese physicians conducted in 2009. Results: Of the 2300 eligible general adult population, 1575 (68.5%) responded. The majority of the general public indicated they believed an autopsy was necessary. However, in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death, the general public were much less likely to indicate they would actually request an autopsy than were physicians (p<0.0001). Currently in Japan the debate about the role autopsy should play in the case of error related to death is underway. The results from this study will be important in informing related decisions.

AB - Context: Autopsy is a useful tool for understanding the cause and manner of unexpected patient death. However, the attitudes of the general public and physicians in Japan about clinical autopsy are limited. Objective: To describe the beliefs of the general public about whether autopsy should be performed and ascertain if they would actually request one given specific clinical situations where patient death occurred with the additional variable of medical error. To compare these attitudes with previously obtained attitudes of physicians practising at Japanese teaching hospitals. Design, setting and participants: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the general public. We sent standardised questionnaires in 2010 to a randomly selected non-physician adult population using a survey company for participant selection. Respondents gave their opinions about the necessity of autopsy and how they might act given various clinical scenarios of patient death. We compared these results with those of a previous survey of Japanese physicians conducted in 2009. Results: Of the 2300 eligible general adult population, 1575 (68.5%) responded. The majority of the general public indicated they believed an autopsy was necessary. However, in cases of unclear medical error or unclear cause and effect relationship of medical care and patient death, the general public were much less likely to indicate they would actually request an autopsy than were physicians (p<0.0001). Currently in Japan the debate about the role autopsy should play in the case of error related to death is underway. The results from this study will be important in informing related decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872272033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872272033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2012-100855

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2012-100855

M3 - Article

C2 - 23019183

AN - SCOPUS:84872272033

VL - 38

SP - 735

EP - 741

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 12

ER -