Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma

Jin Kanzaki, Kaoru Ogawa, Shigeo Ogawa, Minako Yamamoto, Shunya Ikeda, Toshiaki O-uchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Audiological examinations are vital in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. In interpreting their results, however, it is necessary to consider the patient's hearing level. The most sensitive audiological examination is auditory brain stem response (ABR) audiometry. Its most useful parameter is the IT5. A U-shaped audiometric configuration suggests AN, since it is seen in 10% of patients with small tumors. Psychological audiometric tests can be excluded from the battery of screening tests since they have low rates of positive diagnosis. The stapedius reflex (SR) test also has a low positive diagnostic rate in cases of small tumors. Even with the parameters of absence of reflex, elevated threshold, and decay combined, the overall SR test has a lower positive diagnostic rate than ABR audiometry. Nevertheless, the SR test can be employed as a screening device in cases in which the hearing level at 2 kHz and lower is 70 dB or lower, even if it is 71 dB or higher at 4 kHz and 8 kHz. At present, ABR audiometry is applicable in only about half of AN cases. Therefore, the need for early diagnosis must be further emphasized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-132
Number of pages8
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume111
Issue numberS487
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Acoustic Neuroma
Stapedius
Audiometry
Reflex
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Hearing
Psychological Tests
Early Diagnosis
Neoplasms
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Acoustic neuroma
  • Audiological findings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Kanzaki, J., Ogawa, K., Ogawa, S., Yamamoto, M., Ikeda, S., & O-uchi, T. (1991). Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 111(S487), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489109130457

Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma. / Kanzaki, Jin; Ogawa, Kaoru; Ogawa, Shigeo; Yamamoto, Minako; Ikeda, Shunya; O-uchi, Toshiaki.

In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Vol. 111, No. S487, 1991, p. 125-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kanzaki, J, Ogawa, K, Ogawa, S, Yamamoto, M, Ikeda, S & O-uchi, T 1991, 'Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma', Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 111, no. S487, pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489109130457
Kanzaki J, Ogawa K, Ogawa S, Yamamoto M, Ikeda S, O-uchi T. Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 1991;111(S487):125-132. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489109130457
Kanzaki, Jin ; Ogawa, Kaoru ; Ogawa, Shigeo ; Yamamoto, Minako ; Ikeda, Shunya ; O-uchi, Toshiaki. / Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma. In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 1991 ; Vol. 111, No. S487. pp. 125-132.
@article{8fa6384db3ee4c24b10b476303b8479e,
title = "Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma",
abstract = "Audiological examinations are vital in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. In interpreting their results, however, it is necessary to consider the patient's hearing level. The most sensitive audiological examination is auditory brain stem response (ABR) audiometry. Its most useful parameter is the IT5. A U-shaped audiometric configuration suggests AN, since it is seen in 10{\%} of patients with small tumors. Psychological audiometric tests can be excluded from the battery of screening tests since they have low rates of positive diagnosis. The stapedius reflex (SR) test also has a low positive diagnostic rate in cases of small tumors. Even with the parameters of absence of reflex, elevated threshold, and decay combined, the overall SR test has a lower positive diagnostic rate than ABR audiometry. Nevertheless, the SR test can be employed as a screening device in cases in which the hearing level at 2 kHz and lower is 70 dB or lower, even if it is 71 dB or higher at 4 kHz and 8 kHz. At present, ABR audiometry is applicable in only about half of AN cases. Therefore, the need for early diagnosis must be further emphasized.",
keywords = "Acoustic neuroma, Audiological findings",
author = "Jin Kanzaki and Kaoru Ogawa and Shigeo Ogawa and Minako Yamamoto and Shunya Ikeda and Toshiaki O-uchi",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.3109/00016489109130457",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "125--132",
journal = "Acta Oto-Laryngologica",
issn = "0001-6489",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "S487",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Audiological findings in acoustic neuroma

AU - Kanzaki, Jin

AU - Ogawa, Kaoru

AU - Ogawa, Shigeo

AU - Yamamoto, Minako

AU - Ikeda, Shunya

AU - O-uchi, Toshiaki

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Audiological examinations are vital in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. In interpreting their results, however, it is necessary to consider the patient's hearing level. The most sensitive audiological examination is auditory brain stem response (ABR) audiometry. Its most useful parameter is the IT5. A U-shaped audiometric configuration suggests AN, since it is seen in 10% of patients with small tumors. Psychological audiometric tests can be excluded from the battery of screening tests since they have low rates of positive diagnosis. The stapedius reflex (SR) test also has a low positive diagnostic rate in cases of small tumors. Even with the parameters of absence of reflex, elevated threshold, and decay combined, the overall SR test has a lower positive diagnostic rate than ABR audiometry. Nevertheless, the SR test can be employed as a screening device in cases in which the hearing level at 2 kHz and lower is 70 dB or lower, even if it is 71 dB or higher at 4 kHz and 8 kHz. At present, ABR audiometry is applicable in only about half of AN cases. Therefore, the need for early diagnosis must be further emphasized.

AB - Audiological examinations are vital in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. In interpreting their results, however, it is necessary to consider the patient's hearing level. The most sensitive audiological examination is auditory brain stem response (ABR) audiometry. Its most useful parameter is the IT5. A U-shaped audiometric configuration suggests AN, since it is seen in 10% of patients with small tumors. Psychological audiometric tests can be excluded from the battery of screening tests since they have low rates of positive diagnosis. The stapedius reflex (SR) test also has a low positive diagnostic rate in cases of small tumors. Even with the parameters of absence of reflex, elevated threshold, and decay combined, the overall SR test has a lower positive diagnostic rate than ABR audiometry. Nevertheless, the SR test can be employed as a screening device in cases in which the hearing level at 2 kHz and lower is 70 dB or lower, even if it is 71 dB or higher at 4 kHz and 8 kHz. At present, ABR audiometry is applicable in only about half of AN cases. Therefore, the need for early diagnosis must be further emphasized.

KW - Acoustic neuroma

KW - Audiological findings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026360098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026360098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/00016489109130457

DO - 10.3109/00016489109130457

M3 - Article

C2 - 1843574

AN - SCOPUS:0026360098

VL - 111

SP - 125

EP - 132

JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

SN - 0001-6489

IS - S487

ER -