TY - JOUR
T1 - Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Tanabe, Nobuhiro
AU - Kawakami, Takashi
AU - Satoh, Toru
AU - Matsubara, Hiromi
AU - Nakanishi, Norifumi
AU - Ogino, Hitoshi
AU - Tamura, Yuichi
AU - Tsujino, Ichizo
AU - Ogawa, Aiko
AU - Sakao, Seiichiro
AU - Nishizaki, Mari
AU - Ishida, Keiichi
AU - Ichimura, Yasunori
AU - Yoshida, Masahiro
AU - Tatsumi, Koichiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by grants from the Intractable Respiratory Diseases and Pulmonary Hypertension Research Group, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan (H29-027), and the Pulmonary Hypertension Research Group from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (17ek0019127h0003).
Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by grants from the Intractable Respiratory Diseases and Pulmonary Hypertension Research Group, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare , Japan ( H29-027 ), and the Pulmonary Hypertension Research Group from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development , AMED ( 17ek0019127h0003 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Japanese Respiratory Society
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Background: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been performed for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of BPA, especially compared to medical treatment or PEA. Methods: We reviewed all studies investigating pre- and post-treatment pulmonary hemodynamics, mortality, or complications from three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Japan Medical Abstracts Society) prior to February 2017. From 26 studies retrieved, we selected 13 studies (493 patients): the 10 most recent ones including complete data from each institution, one study of residual pulmonary hypertension, and two studies comparing BPA with medical treatment or PEA. Results: No randomized controlled or prospective controlled studies comparing BPA with medical treatment or PEA were reported. The early mortality of BPA ranged from 0% to 14.3%; lung injury occurred in 7.0% to 31.4% (average sessions, 2.5–6.6). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 39.4–56 to 20.9–36 mm Hg, and the 6-min walk distance increased from 191–405 to 359–501 m. The 2-year mortality of 80 patients undergoing BPA was significantly lower compared to 68 patients receiving medical treatment (1.3% vs. 13.2%); the risk ratio was 0.14 (95% confidence interval: 0.03–0.76). No significant difference was observed in the 2-year mortality between BPA (n=97) and PEA (n=63) patients. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that BPA improves hemodynamics, has acceptable early mortality, and may improve long-term survival compared with medical treatment in inoperable CTEPH patients.
AB - Background: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been performed for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of BPA, especially compared to medical treatment or PEA. Methods: We reviewed all studies investigating pre- and post-treatment pulmonary hemodynamics, mortality, or complications from three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Japan Medical Abstracts Society) prior to February 2017. From 26 studies retrieved, we selected 13 studies (493 patients): the 10 most recent ones including complete data from each institution, one study of residual pulmonary hypertension, and two studies comparing BPA with medical treatment or PEA. Results: No randomized controlled or prospective controlled studies comparing BPA with medical treatment or PEA were reported. The early mortality of BPA ranged from 0% to 14.3%; lung injury occurred in 7.0% to 31.4% (average sessions, 2.5–6.6). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 39.4–56 to 20.9–36 mm Hg, and the 6-min walk distance increased from 191–405 to 359–501 m. The 2-year mortality of 80 patients undergoing BPA was significantly lower compared to 68 patients receiving medical treatment (1.3% vs. 13.2%); the risk ratio was 0.14 (95% confidence interval: 0.03–0.76). No significant difference was observed in the 2-year mortality between BPA (n=97) and PEA (n=63) patients. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that BPA improves hemodynamics, has acceptable early mortality, and may improve long-term survival compared with medical treatment in inoperable CTEPH patients.
KW - Balloon pulmonary angioplasty
KW - Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
KW - Medical treatment
KW - Pulmonary endarterectomy
KW - Pulmonary vasodilator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049323653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049323653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.03.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 30008295
AN - SCOPUS:85049323653
SN - 2212-5345
VL - 56
SP - 332
EP - 341
JO - Respiratory Investigation
JF - Respiratory Investigation
IS - 4
ER -