Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending

Naoki Miura, Tomohisa Kumagai, Masanori Kikuchi, Akiyuki Takahashi, Yun Jae Kim, Toshio Nagashima, Yoshitaka Wada

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

In this study, some benchmark problems on fracture tests for circumferentially through-wall/surface cracked pipes were provided. The participants predicted the ductile crack propagation behavior by their own approaches, including nucleation, growth, and coalescence of voids simulated by Gurson model, ductile crack propagation using stress modified fracture strain (SMFS) model, J-integral based ductile crack propagation using XFEM, CTOA based ductile crack propagation using FEM, stress triaxiality and plastic strain (STPS) based ductile crack propagation using FEM, and ductile crack propagation using peridynamics. Among them, GTN, CTOA and STPS models were not applied to surface crack problems. Discrepancies between the experimental maximum loads and calculated maximum loads were within 10% in most cases and 25% in the maximum case. Element size dependency of analysis parameters were considered in SMFS and GTN models while those were determined from independent material tests. Gurson model can predict slanting crack propagation directions. XFEM which did not need analysis fitting parameters cannot analyze beyond the peaks of load-LPD curves. Crack propagation directions were given and fixed in both CTOA and STPS models. Parameters in Gurson model and peridynamics were optimized to reproduce load-LPD curve in one of the benchmark problems.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMaterials and Fabrication
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Electronic)9780791857991
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes
EventASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2017 - Waikoloa, United States
Duration: 2017 Jul 162017 Jul 20

Publication series

NameAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP
Volume6A-2017
ISSN (Print)0277-027X

Conference

ConferenceASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2017
CountryUnited States
CityWaikoloa
Period17/7/1617/7/20

Fingerprint

Ductile fracture
Crack propagation
Pipe
Plastic deformation
Finite element method
Coalescence
Nucleation
Cracks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Miura, N., Kumagai, T., Kikuchi, M., Takahashi, A., Kim, Y. J., Nagashima, T., & Wada, Y. (2017). Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending. In Materials and Fabrication (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP; Vol. 6A-2017). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65548

Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending. / Miura, Naoki; Kumagai, Tomohisa; Kikuchi, Masanori; Takahashi, Akiyuki; Kim, Yun Jae; Nagashima, Toshio; Wada, Yoshitaka.

Materials and Fabrication. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017. (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP; Vol. 6A-2017).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Miura, N, Kumagai, T, Kikuchi, M, Takahashi, A, Kim, YJ, Nagashima, T & Wada, Y 2017, Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending. in Materials and Fabrication. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP, vol. 6A-2017, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2017, Waikoloa, United States, 17/7/16. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65548
Miura N, Kumagai T, Kikuchi M, Takahashi A, Kim YJ, Nagashima T et al. Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending. In Materials and Fabrication. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2017. (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP). https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2017-65548
Miura, Naoki ; Kumagai, Tomohisa ; Kikuchi, Masanori ; Takahashi, Akiyuki ; Kim, Yun Jae ; Nagashima, Toshio ; Wada, Yoshitaka. / Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending. Materials and Fabrication. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2017. (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP).
@inproceedings{342325b795dc42548e0cb7cabdd42c9c,
title = "Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending",
abstract = "In this study, some benchmark problems on fracture tests for circumferentially through-wall/surface cracked pipes were provided. The participants predicted the ductile crack propagation behavior by their own approaches, including nucleation, growth, and coalescence of voids simulated by Gurson model, ductile crack propagation using stress modified fracture strain (SMFS) model, J-integral based ductile crack propagation using XFEM, CTOA based ductile crack propagation using FEM, stress triaxiality and plastic strain (STPS) based ductile crack propagation using FEM, and ductile crack propagation using peridynamics. Among them, GTN, CTOA and STPS models were not applied to surface crack problems. Discrepancies between the experimental maximum loads and calculated maximum loads were within 10{\%} in most cases and 25{\%} in the maximum case. Element size dependency of analysis parameters were considered in SMFS and GTN models while those were determined from independent material tests. Gurson model can predict slanting crack propagation directions. XFEM which did not need analysis fitting parameters cannot analyze beyond the peaks of load-LPD curves. Crack propagation directions were given and fixed in both CTOA and STPS models. Parameters in Gurson model and peridynamics were optimized to reproduce load-LPD curve in one of the benchmark problems.",
author = "Naoki Miura and Tomohisa Kumagai and Masanori Kikuchi and Akiyuki Takahashi and Kim, {Yun Jae} and Toshio Nagashima and Yoshitaka Wada",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/PVP2017-65548",
language = "English",
series = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
booktitle = "Materials and Fabrication",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Benchmark analysis of ductile fracture simulation for circumferentially cracked pipes subjected to bending

AU - Miura, Naoki

AU - Kumagai, Tomohisa

AU - Kikuchi, Masanori

AU - Takahashi, Akiyuki

AU - Kim, Yun Jae

AU - Nagashima, Toshio

AU - Wada, Yoshitaka

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In this study, some benchmark problems on fracture tests for circumferentially through-wall/surface cracked pipes were provided. The participants predicted the ductile crack propagation behavior by their own approaches, including nucleation, growth, and coalescence of voids simulated by Gurson model, ductile crack propagation using stress modified fracture strain (SMFS) model, J-integral based ductile crack propagation using XFEM, CTOA based ductile crack propagation using FEM, stress triaxiality and plastic strain (STPS) based ductile crack propagation using FEM, and ductile crack propagation using peridynamics. Among them, GTN, CTOA and STPS models were not applied to surface crack problems. Discrepancies between the experimental maximum loads and calculated maximum loads were within 10% in most cases and 25% in the maximum case. Element size dependency of analysis parameters were considered in SMFS and GTN models while those were determined from independent material tests. Gurson model can predict slanting crack propagation directions. XFEM which did not need analysis fitting parameters cannot analyze beyond the peaks of load-LPD curves. Crack propagation directions were given and fixed in both CTOA and STPS models. Parameters in Gurson model and peridynamics were optimized to reproduce load-LPD curve in one of the benchmark problems.

AB - In this study, some benchmark problems on fracture tests for circumferentially through-wall/surface cracked pipes were provided. The participants predicted the ductile crack propagation behavior by their own approaches, including nucleation, growth, and coalescence of voids simulated by Gurson model, ductile crack propagation using stress modified fracture strain (SMFS) model, J-integral based ductile crack propagation using XFEM, CTOA based ductile crack propagation using FEM, stress triaxiality and plastic strain (STPS) based ductile crack propagation using FEM, and ductile crack propagation using peridynamics. Among them, GTN, CTOA and STPS models were not applied to surface crack problems. Discrepancies between the experimental maximum loads and calculated maximum loads were within 10% in most cases and 25% in the maximum case. Element size dependency of analysis parameters were considered in SMFS and GTN models while those were determined from independent material tests. Gurson model can predict slanting crack propagation directions. XFEM which did not need analysis fitting parameters cannot analyze beyond the peaks of load-LPD curves. Crack propagation directions were given and fixed in both CTOA and STPS models. Parameters in Gurson model and peridynamics were optimized to reproduce load-LPD curve in one of the benchmark problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034067810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034067810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/PVP2017-65548

DO - 10.1115/PVP2017-65548

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85034067810

T3 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP

BT - Materials and Fabrication

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -