Benefit of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with a high BMI

Masayuki Hagiwara, Akira Miyajima, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Eiji Kikuchi, Ken Nakagawa, Mototsugu Oya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze all relevant data collected thus far at our hospital in order to compare the laparoscopic vs. open techniques in terms of the intraoperative results and to analyze whether patients with a higher BMI may derive greater benefit from laparoscopy. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 93 patients treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy and 91 patients treated with the open method at our institution. We analyzed the data with the aim of determining what kind of factor would be associated with an increase in estimated blood loss and prolongation of operative time, and we compared the results for laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Results: A statistically significant correlation was observed between body mass index and operating time (P = 0.018) or estimated blood loss (P = 0.017) in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that body mass index was an independent risk factor for prolonged operating time (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.174). In the open nephrectomy patients, body mass index also had a significant correlation with operating time (P < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also revealed that operating time depended on body mass index (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 1.348) and tumor size (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.320), and the odds ratio of body mass index was higher than that in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: As body mass index increases, both laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy become technically more difficult. However, our data showed that for patients with a high body mass index, the laparoscopic approach is comparatively safer and of greater benefit.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberhyq179
Pages (from-to)400-404
Number of pages5
JournalJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Mar

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Body Mass Index
Odds Ratio
Multivariate Analysis
Operative Time
Laparoscopy
Medical Records
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Laparoscopy
  • Nephrectomy
  • Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Benefit of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with a high BMI. / Hagiwara, Masayuki; Miyajima, Akira; Matsumoto, Kazuhiro; Kikuchi, Eiji; Nakagawa, Ken; Oya, Mototsugu.

In: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 41, No. 3, hyq179, 03.2011, p. 400-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23ac25b42dfa4cd78e7ad6ef46eda641,
title = "Benefit of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with a high BMI",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze all relevant data collected thus far at our hospital in order to compare the laparoscopic vs. open techniques in terms of the intraoperative results and to analyze whether patients with a higher BMI may derive greater benefit from laparoscopy. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 93 patients treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy and 91 patients treated with the open method at our institution. We analyzed the data with the aim of determining what kind of factor would be associated with an increase in estimated blood loss and prolongation of operative time, and we compared the results for laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Results: A statistically significant correlation was observed between body mass index and operating time (P = 0.018) or estimated blood loss (P = 0.017) in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that body mass index was an independent risk factor for prolonged operating time (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.174). In the open nephrectomy patients, body mass index also had a significant correlation with operating time (P < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also revealed that operating time depended on body mass index (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 1.348) and tumor size (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.320), and the odds ratio of body mass index was higher than that in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: As body mass index increases, both laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy become technically more difficult. However, our data showed that for patients with a high body mass index, the laparoscopic approach is comparatively safer and of greater benefit.",
keywords = "Body mass index, Laparoscopy, Nephrectomy, Obesity",
author = "Masayuki Hagiwara and Akira Miyajima and Kazuhiro Matsumoto and Eiji Kikuchi and Ken Nakagawa and Mototsugu Oya",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1093/jjco/hyq179",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "400--404",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0368-2811",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with a high BMI

AU - Hagiwara, Masayuki

AU - Miyajima, Akira

AU - Matsumoto, Kazuhiro

AU - Kikuchi, Eiji

AU - Nakagawa, Ken

AU - Oya, Mototsugu

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze all relevant data collected thus far at our hospital in order to compare the laparoscopic vs. open techniques in terms of the intraoperative results and to analyze whether patients with a higher BMI may derive greater benefit from laparoscopy. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 93 patients treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy and 91 patients treated with the open method at our institution. We analyzed the data with the aim of determining what kind of factor would be associated with an increase in estimated blood loss and prolongation of operative time, and we compared the results for laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Results: A statistically significant correlation was observed between body mass index and operating time (P = 0.018) or estimated blood loss (P = 0.017) in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that body mass index was an independent risk factor for prolonged operating time (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.174). In the open nephrectomy patients, body mass index also had a significant correlation with operating time (P < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also revealed that operating time depended on body mass index (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 1.348) and tumor size (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.320), and the odds ratio of body mass index was higher than that in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: As body mass index increases, both laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy become technically more difficult. However, our data showed that for patients with a high body mass index, the laparoscopic approach is comparatively safer and of greater benefit.

AB - Objective: The aim of the present study was to analyze all relevant data collected thus far at our hospital in order to compare the laparoscopic vs. open techniques in terms of the intraoperative results and to analyze whether patients with a higher BMI may derive greater benefit from laparoscopy. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 93 patients treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy and 91 patients treated with the open method at our institution. We analyzed the data with the aim of determining what kind of factor would be associated with an increase in estimated blood loss and prolongation of operative time, and we compared the results for laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Results: A statistically significant correlation was observed between body mass index and operating time (P = 0.018) or estimated blood loss (P = 0.017) in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that body mass index was an independent risk factor for prolonged operating time (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.174). In the open nephrectomy patients, body mass index also had a significant correlation with operating time (P < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also revealed that operating time depended on body mass index (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 1.348) and tumor size (P = 0.030, odds ratio = 1.320), and the odds ratio of body mass index was higher than that in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: As body mass index increases, both laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy become technically more difficult. However, our data showed that for patients with a high body mass index, the laparoscopic approach is comparatively safer and of greater benefit.

KW - Body mass index

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Nephrectomy

KW - Obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952373590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952373590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jjco/hyq179

DO - 10.1093/jjco/hyq179

M3 - Article

C2 - 20926414

AN - SCOPUS:79952373590

VL - 41

SP - 400

EP - 404

JO - Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0368-2811

IS - 3

M1 - hyq179

ER -