TY - JOUR
T1 - Benefit of rebiopsy for deciding treatment strategy in rectal cancer
T2 - A case report
AU - Kawasaki, Kenta
AU - Hamamoto, Yasuo
AU - Suzuki, Takeshi
AU - Hirata, Kenro
AU - Sukawa, Yasutaka
AU - Kasuga, Akiyoshi
AU - Hayashi, Yuichiro
AU - Takaishi, Hiromasa
AU - Kameyama, Kaori
AU - Kanai, Takanori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Spandidos Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Rebiopsy is considered an option for specific types of cancer, such as breast, non-small cell lung, and prostate cancer, in clinical trials and in practice. The benefit of rebiopsy comes from the selection of a new treatment strategy based on the genetic profile of the cells, which may reflect the development of drug resistance or hormonal changes. For colorectal cancer, the presence of different genomic mutations between the primary tumor and its metastases is rare, and rebiopsy is therefore not generally performed. The present study reports the case of a 68-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma from a primary colorectal cancer, but was subsequently rediagnosed with metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma based on the pathological rebiopsy results. The patient responded well to cisplatin and etoposide treatment, after not responding to initial FOLFOX treatment. In this case, rebiopsy resulted in a change in treatment regimen and improved the patient's quality of life and his long-term survival. This case indicates that, when a colorectal cancer patient is unresponsive to standard treatment, it may be beneficial for the clinician to suspect an atypical histological type, and to consider rebiopsy.
AB - Rebiopsy is considered an option for specific types of cancer, such as breast, non-small cell lung, and prostate cancer, in clinical trials and in practice. The benefit of rebiopsy comes from the selection of a new treatment strategy based on the genetic profile of the cells, which may reflect the development of drug resistance or hormonal changes. For colorectal cancer, the presence of different genomic mutations between the primary tumor and its metastases is rare, and rebiopsy is therefore not generally performed. The present study reports the case of a 68-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma from a primary colorectal cancer, but was subsequently rediagnosed with metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma based on the pathological rebiopsy results. The patient responded well to cisplatin and etoposide treatment, after not responding to initial FOLFOX treatment. In this case, rebiopsy resulted in a change in treatment regimen and improved the patient's quality of life and his long-term survival. This case indicates that, when a colorectal cancer patient is unresponsive to standard treatment, it may be beneficial for the clinician to suspect an atypical histological type, and to consider rebiopsy.
KW - Biopsy
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Neuroendocrine cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026325285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026325285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3892/ol.2017.6601
DO - 10.3892/ol.2017.6601
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85026325285
SN - 1792-1074
VL - 14
SP - 3697
EP - 3700
JO - Oncology Letters
JF - Oncology Letters
IS - 3
ER -