Brief measure for screening complicated grief

Reliability and discriminant validity

Masaya Ito, Satomi Nakajima, Daisuke Fujisawa, Mitsunori Miyashita, Yoshiharu Kim, M. Katherine Shear, Angela Ghesquiere, Melanie M. Wall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Complicated grief, which is often under-recognized and under-treated, can lead to substantial impairment in functioning. The Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) is a 5-item self-report or interview instrument for screening complicated grief. Although investigations with help-seeking samples suggest that the BGQ is valid and reliable, it has not been validated in a broader population. Methodology/Principal Findings: A questionnaire was mailed to a randomly selected sample (n = 5000) residing in one of 4 areas of Japan. The BCQ was examined for responders who were bereaved more than 6 months and less than 10 years (n = 915). Non-specific psychological distress was assessed with the K6 screening scale. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis supported a uni-dimensional factor structure and the invariance of parameters across gender and age. Cronbach's alpha was sufficiently high (alpha =. 75) to confirm internal consistency. Average Variance Extracted (0.39) was higher than the shared covariance (0.14) between BGQ and K6, suggesting discriminant validity. Conclusions: The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the BGQ in the Japanese population. Future studies should examine predictive validity by using structured interviews or more detailed scales for complicated grief.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere31209
JournalPLoS One
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Feb 14
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Grief
Reproducibility of Results
Screening
questionnaires
screening
Factor analysis
Invariance
interviews
distress
Interviews
Japan
Self Report
Population
Statistical Factor Analysis
sampling
gender
Surveys and Questionnaires
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ito, M., Nakajima, S., Fujisawa, D., Miyashita, M., Kim, Y., Shear, M. K., ... Wall, M. M. (2012). Brief measure for screening complicated grief: Reliability and discriminant validity. PLoS One, 7(2), [e31209]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031209

Brief measure for screening complicated grief : Reliability and discriminant validity. / Ito, Masaya; Nakajima, Satomi; Fujisawa, Daisuke; Miyashita, Mitsunori; Kim, Yoshiharu; Shear, M. Katherine; Ghesquiere, Angela; Wall, Melanie M.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 7, No. 2, e31209, 14.02.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ito, M, Nakajima, S, Fujisawa, D, Miyashita, M, Kim, Y, Shear, MK, Ghesquiere, A & Wall, MM 2012, 'Brief measure for screening complicated grief: Reliability and discriminant validity', PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 2, e31209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031209
Ito, Masaya ; Nakajima, Satomi ; Fujisawa, Daisuke ; Miyashita, Mitsunori ; Kim, Yoshiharu ; Shear, M. Katherine ; Ghesquiere, Angela ; Wall, Melanie M. / Brief measure for screening complicated grief : Reliability and discriminant validity. In: PLoS One. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 2.
@article{4d8bc9bde57f44f7b559daecc81be2be,
title = "Brief measure for screening complicated grief: Reliability and discriminant validity",
abstract = "Background: Complicated grief, which is often under-recognized and under-treated, can lead to substantial impairment in functioning. The Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) is a 5-item self-report or interview instrument for screening complicated grief. Although investigations with help-seeking samples suggest that the BGQ is valid and reliable, it has not been validated in a broader population. Methodology/Principal Findings: A questionnaire was mailed to a randomly selected sample (n = 5000) residing in one of 4 areas of Japan. The BCQ was examined for responders who were bereaved more than 6 months and less than 10 years (n = 915). Non-specific psychological distress was assessed with the K6 screening scale. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis supported a uni-dimensional factor structure and the invariance of parameters across gender and age. Cronbach's alpha was sufficiently high (alpha =. 75) to confirm internal consistency. Average Variance Extracted (0.39) was higher than the shared covariance (0.14) between BGQ and K6, suggesting discriminant validity. Conclusions: The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the BGQ in the Japanese population. Future studies should examine predictive validity by using structured interviews or more detailed scales for complicated grief.",
author = "Masaya Ito and Satomi Nakajima and Daisuke Fujisawa and Mitsunori Miyashita and Yoshiharu Kim and Shear, {M. Katherine} and Angela Ghesquiere and Wall, {Melanie M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0031209",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief measure for screening complicated grief

T2 - Reliability and discriminant validity

AU - Ito, Masaya

AU - Nakajima, Satomi

AU - Fujisawa, Daisuke

AU - Miyashita, Mitsunori

AU - Kim, Yoshiharu

AU - Shear, M. Katherine

AU - Ghesquiere, Angela

AU - Wall, Melanie M.

PY - 2012/2/14

Y1 - 2012/2/14

N2 - Background: Complicated grief, which is often under-recognized and under-treated, can lead to substantial impairment in functioning. The Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) is a 5-item self-report or interview instrument for screening complicated grief. Although investigations with help-seeking samples suggest that the BGQ is valid and reliable, it has not been validated in a broader population. Methodology/Principal Findings: A questionnaire was mailed to a randomly selected sample (n = 5000) residing in one of 4 areas of Japan. The BCQ was examined for responders who were bereaved more than 6 months and less than 10 years (n = 915). Non-specific psychological distress was assessed with the K6 screening scale. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis supported a uni-dimensional factor structure and the invariance of parameters across gender and age. Cronbach's alpha was sufficiently high (alpha =. 75) to confirm internal consistency. Average Variance Extracted (0.39) was higher than the shared covariance (0.14) between BGQ and K6, suggesting discriminant validity. Conclusions: The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the BGQ in the Japanese population. Future studies should examine predictive validity by using structured interviews or more detailed scales for complicated grief.

AB - Background: Complicated grief, which is often under-recognized and under-treated, can lead to substantial impairment in functioning. The Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) is a 5-item self-report or interview instrument for screening complicated grief. Although investigations with help-seeking samples suggest that the BGQ is valid and reliable, it has not been validated in a broader population. Methodology/Principal Findings: A questionnaire was mailed to a randomly selected sample (n = 5000) residing in one of 4 areas of Japan. The BCQ was examined for responders who were bereaved more than 6 months and less than 10 years (n = 915). Non-specific psychological distress was assessed with the K6 screening scale. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis supported a uni-dimensional factor structure and the invariance of parameters across gender and age. Cronbach's alpha was sufficiently high (alpha =. 75) to confirm internal consistency. Average Variance Extracted (0.39) was higher than the shared covariance (0.14) between BGQ and K6, suggesting discriminant validity. Conclusions: The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the BGQ in the Japanese population. Future studies should examine predictive validity by using structured interviews or more detailed scales for complicated grief.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863133290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863133290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0031209

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0031209

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e31209

ER -