Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the general issue of the quality of phonological data, using rendaku as a case study. Rendaku is a widely-discussed voicing process that accompanies compound formation in Japanese. The issue of the quality of phonological data has been discussed from time to time from various perspectives throughout the history of phonological research, and we are recently witnessing renewed interest in this topic. This paper takes up rendaku as a case study to address this issue. Rendaku has been used to argue for many theoretical devices, but it is rarely acknowledged in the theoretical literature that rendaku involves extensive lexical irregularity. The specific question addressed in this study is whether it is appropriate to use rendaku for phonological argumentation. The answer that this paper proposes is yes, but the more crucial lesson is that theoretical phonology should evaluate the quality of phonological data more explicitly. The current discussion offers a first step toward establishing general guidelines about what kind of evidence can be used to decide whether a pattern under question is phonological or not.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalLinguistics Vanguard
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Dec 1

Fingerprint

argumentation
phonology
history
evidence
Rendaku
Argumentation
time

Keywords

  • Experimental phonology
  • Ocp
  • Orthography
  • Phonological argumentation
  • Rendaku

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation? / Kawahara, Shigeto.

In: Linguistics Vanguard, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.12.2015, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{ed4e474287f647f3b24a52d048ef66d1,
title = "Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?",
abstract = "This paper addresses the general issue of the quality of phonological data, using rendaku as a case study. Rendaku is a widely-discussed voicing process that accompanies compound formation in Japanese. The issue of the quality of phonological data has been discussed from time to time from various perspectives throughout the history of phonological research, and we are recently witnessing renewed interest in this topic. This paper takes up rendaku as a case study to address this issue. Rendaku has been used to argue for many theoretical devices, but it is rarely acknowledged in the theoretical literature that rendaku involves extensive lexical irregularity. The specific question addressed in this study is whether it is appropriate to use rendaku for phonological argumentation. The answer that this paper proposes is yes, but the more crucial lesson is that theoretical phonology should evaluate the quality of phonological data more explicitly. The current discussion offers a first step toward establishing general guidelines about what kind of evidence can be used to decide whether a pattern under question is phonological or not.",
keywords = "Experimental phonology, Ocp, Orthography, Phonological argumentation, Rendaku",
author = "Shigeto Kawahara",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/lingvan-2015-0001",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Linguistics Vanguard",
issn = "2199-174X",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?

AU - Kawahara, Shigeto

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - This paper addresses the general issue of the quality of phonological data, using rendaku as a case study. Rendaku is a widely-discussed voicing process that accompanies compound formation in Japanese. The issue of the quality of phonological data has been discussed from time to time from various perspectives throughout the history of phonological research, and we are recently witnessing renewed interest in this topic. This paper takes up rendaku as a case study to address this issue. Rendaku has been used to argue for many theoretical devices, but it is rarely acknowledged in the theoretical literature that rendaku involves extensive lexical irregularity. The specific question addressed in this study is whether it is appropriate to use rendaku for phonological argumentation. The answer that this paper proposes is yes, but the more crucial lesson is that theoretical phonology should evaluate the quality of phonological data more explicitly. The current discussion offers a first step toward establishing general guidelines about what kind of evidence can be used to decide whether a pattern under question is phonological or not.

AB - This paper addresses the general issue of the quality of phonological data, using rendaku as a case study. Rendaku is a widely-discussed voicing process that accompanies compound formation in Japanese. The issue of the quality of phonological data has been discussed from time to time from various perspectives throughout the history of phonological research, and we are recently witnessing renewed interest in this topic. This paper takes up rendaku as a case study to address this issue. Rendaku has been used to argue for many theoretical devices, but it is rarely acknowledged in the theoretical literature that rendaku involves extensive lexical irregularity. The specific question addressed in this study is whether it is appropriate to use rendaku for phonological argumentation. The answer that this paper proposes is yes, but the more crucial lesson is that theoretical phonology should evaluate the quality of phonological data more explicitly. The current discussion offers a first step toward establishing general guidelines about what kind of evidence can be used to decide whether a pattern under question is phonological or not.

KW - Experimental phonology

KW - Ocp

KW - Orthography

KW - Phonological argumentation

KW - Rendaku

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922372439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922372439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/lingvan-2015-0001

DO - 10.1515/lingvan-2015-0001

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84922372439

VL - 1

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Linguistics Vanguard

JF - Linguistics Vanguard

SN - 2199-174X

IS - 1

ER -