Choices, policy logics and problems in the design of long-term care systems

Naoki Ikegami, John Creighton Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Establishing a public, comprehensive, independent, mainly community-based long-term care system, separate from medical care and social services, can lead to the provision of more effective and consumer-oriented services, and also to a more appropriate mix of public/ private financing. Of the two main approaches to financing long-term care (LTC), a tax-based model is more flexible in providing benefits according to the individual's need, since income levels and the family's ability to provide care will be taken into consideration, while a social insurance model is more rigid because the individual's right are more explicity defined. The latter system is likely to provide more opportunities for choice, including decisions about the mix of health and social services. Policy-makers must decide which approach to take after weighing the positive and negative aspects of each, and the existing organizational infrastructure. Decisions must also be made on the practical issues of coverage, fairness, form of benefits, service delivery patterns, relationship with medical and social services, and controlling costs. With increasing pressure to contain public sector expenditures and improve efficiency, the focus of care will gradually shift from medical care to LTC, and within LTC, from institutions to housing. How to make this process proactive and planned, instead of ad hoc and reactive, is the challenge for public policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)719-734
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume36
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Dec

Fingerprint

mobile social services
health services
public sector
medical care
expenditure
infrastructure
income
social insurance
cost
taxes
fairness
public
social service
policy
health service
expenditures
public policy
coverage
housing
efficiency

Keywords

  • Entitlement
  • Long-term care
  • Social insurance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Development

Cite this

Choices, policy logics and problems in the design of long-term care systems. / Ikegami, Naoki; Campbell, John Creighton.

In: Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 36, No. 7, 12.2002, p. 719-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ikegami, Naoki ; Campbell, John Creighton. / Choices, policy logics and problems in the design of long-term care systems. In: Social Policy and Administration. 2002 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 719-734.
@article{2662d82c1d414b3491ff40556cef2e29,
title = "Choices, policy logics and problems in the design of long-term care systems",
abstract = "Establishing a public, comprehensive, independent, mainly community-based long-term care system, separate from medical care and social services, can lead to the provision of more effective and consumer-oriented services, and also to a more appropriate mix of public/ private financing. Of the two main approaches to financing long-term care (LTC), a tax-based model is more flexible in providing benefits according to the individual's need, since income levels and the family's ability to provide care will be taken into consideration, while a social insurance model is more rigid because the individual's right are more explicity defined. The latter system is likely to provide more opportunities for choice, including decisions about the mix of health and social services. Policy-makers must decide which approach to take after weighing the positive and negative aspects of each, and the existing organizational infrastructure. Decisions must also be made on the practical issues of coverage, fairness, form of benefits, service delivery patterns, relationship with medical and social services, and controlling costs. With increasing pressure to contain public sector expenditures and improve efficiency, the focus of care will gradually shift from medical care to LTC, and within LTC, from institutions to housing. How to make this process proactive and planned, instead of ad hoc and reactive, is the challenge for public policy.",
keywords = "Entitlement, Long-term care, Social insurance",
author = "Naoki Ikegami and Campbell, {John Creighton}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "719--734",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choices, policy logics and problems in the design of long-term care systems

AU - Ikegami, Naoki

AU - Campbell, John Creighton

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - Establishing a public, comprehensive, independent, mainly community-based long-term care system, separate from medical care and social services, can lead to the provision of more effective and consumer-oriented services, and also to a more appropriate mix of public/ private financing. Of the two main approaches to financing long-term care (LTC), a tax-based model is more flexible in providing benefits according to the individual's need, since income levels and the family's ability to provide care will be taken into consideration, while a social insurance model is more rigid because the individual's right are more explicity defined. The latter system is likely to provide more opportunities for choice, including decisions about the mix of health and social services. Policy-makers must decide which approach to take after weighing the positive and negative aspects of each, and the existing organizational infrastructure. Decisions must also be made on the practical issues of coverage, fairness, form of benefits, service delivery patterns, relationship with medical and social services, and controlling costs. With increasing pressure to contain public sector expenditures and improve efficiency, the focus of care will gradually shift from medical care to LTC, and within LTC, from institutions to housing. How to make this process proactive and planned, instead of ad hoc and reactive, is the challenge for public policy.

AB - Establishing a public, comprehensive, independent, mainly community-based long-term care system, separate from medical care and social services, can lead to the provision of more effective and consumer-oriented services, and also to a more appropriate mix of public/ private financing. Of the two main approaches to financing long-term care (LTC), a tax-based model is more flexible in providing benefits according to the individual's need, since income levels and the family's ability to provide care will be taken into consideration, while a social insurance model is more rigid because the individual's right are more explicity defined. The latter system is likely to provide more opportunities for choice, including decisions about the mix of health and social services. Policy-makers must decide which approach to take after weighing the positive and negative aspects of each, and the existing organizational infrastructure. Decisions must also be made on the practical issues of coverage, fairness, form of benefits, service delivery patterns, relationship with medical and social services, and controlling costs. With increasing pressure to contain public sector expenditures and improve efficiency, the focus of care will gradually shift from medical care to LTC, and within LTC, from institutions to housing. How to make this process proactive and planned, instead of ad hoc and reactive, is the challenge for public policy.

KW - Entitlement

KW - Long-term care

KW - Social insurance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036993181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036993181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036993181

VL - 36

SP - 719

EP - 734

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 7

ER -