Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy

Megan Ceronsky, Cameron Hepburn, Michael Obersteiner, Yoshiki Yamagata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Kagan (2002) argues that the different responses of Europeans and Americans to major strategic and international challenges is not simply due to differences in the current administrations, but rather results from (i) a power gap and (ii) differing ideologies. This article applies Kagan's theory to climate policy, employing terrorism policy as a point of comparison. We argue that the power gap between Europe and America is unable to explain the differences in climate policy. In contrast, the ideology gap may indeed have some explanatory value. Furthermore, we argue that one additional feature is critical—the costs and benefits imposed by climate change and terrorism prevention, and the process by which such costs and benefits are evaluated, differ between America and Europe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-357
Number of pages11
JournalClimate Policy
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes


  • Climate policy
  • International negotiations
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • Power and weakness
  • Terrorism
  • Transatlantic divide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this