Classification of habitats by “Classification Tree”: A case study on riparian habitats of birds. Ecol. Civil Eng. 5(2), 189-201, 2003

Kazuhiro Katoh, Tomohiro Ichinose, Toshimori Takahashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Multivariate analysis of ecological data has been applied to environmental analysis and evaluation. Recently, some ecologists reported that classification and regression trees (CART) are ideally suited for the analysis of complex ecological data. We use classification tree to analyze the relationship between avian species composition and habitat conditions from 37 study plots located in a riparian area of the Tama-gawa River, Tokyo. The data were comprised of census data of birds and vegetation structural information. First, the study plots were classified by TWINSPAN based on the avian species composition. Then, we tried to recover the grouping of the study plots by classification tree or canonical discriminant analysis using the vegetation structural information so that we could find the relationship between avian species composition and vegetation structure. Classification tree analysis performed almost as well as canonical discriminant analysis. Classification tree models explain variation of a single response variable (here, avian fauna type) by repeatedly splitting the study plots into more homogeneous groups, using combinations of explanatory variables (here, vegetation structural parameters). This structure is simple, suitable for dealing with high-order interactions, so that classification tree can give easily interpretable results. Finally, based on the comparison of classification tree and canonical discriminant analysis, we concluded that classification tree was more suitable than discriminant analysis for landscape evaluation and planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-201
Number of pages13
JournalEcology and Civil Engineering
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Birds
bird
Discriminant analysis
habitat
discriminant analysis
vegetation
Chemical analysis
TWINSPAN
Trees (mathematics)
vegetation structure
multivariate analysis
census
Rivers
fauna
Planning
river

Keywords

  • classification trees
  • discriminant analysis
  • landscape planning
  • species composition
  • vegetation structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Ecology

Cite this

Classification of habitats by “Classification Tree” : A case study on riparian habitats of birds. Ecol. Civil Eng. 5(2), 189-201, 2003. / Katoh, Kazuhiro; Ichinose, Tomohiro; Takahashi, Toshimori.

In: Ecology and Civil Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2003, p. 189-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a38a07e55c0414c8f806d92fb32276e,
title = "Classification of habitats by “Classification Tree”: A case study on riparian habitats of birds. Ecol. Civil Eng. 5(2), 189-201, 2003",
abstract = "Multivariate analysis of ecological data has been applied to environmental analysis and evaluation. Recently, some ecologists reported that classification and regression trees (CART) are ideally suited for the analysis of complex ecological data. We use classification tree to analyze the relationship between avian species composition and habitat conditions from 37 study plots located in a riparian area of the Tama-gawa River, Tokyo. The data were comprised of census data of birds and vegetation structural information. First, the study plots were classified by TWINSPAN based on the avian species composition. Then, we tried to recover the grouping of the study plots by classification tree or canonical discriminant analysis using the vegetation structural information so that we could find the relationship between avian species composition and vegetation structure. Classification tree analysis performed almost as well as canonical discriminant analysis. Classification tree models explain variation of a single response variable (here, avian fauna type) by repeatedly splitting the study plots into more homogeneous groups, using combinations of explanatory variables (here, vegetation structural parameters). This structure is simple, suitable for dealing with high-order interactions, so that classification tree can give easily interpretable results. Finally, based on the comparison of classification tree and canonical discriminant analysis, we concluded that classification tree was more suitable than discriminant analysis for landscape evaluation and planning.",
keywords = "classification trees, discriminant analysis, landscape planning, species composition, vegetation structure",
author = "Kazuhiro Katoh and Tomohiro Ichinose and Toshimori Takahashi",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.3825/ece.5.189",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "189--201",
journal = "Ecology and Civil Engineering",
issn = "1344-3755",
publisher = "Ecology and Civil Engineering Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of habitats by “Classification Tree”

T2 - A case study on riparian habitats of birds. Ecol. Civil Eng. 5(2), 189-201, 2003

AU - Katoh, Kazuhiro

AU - Ichinose, Tomohiro

AU - Takahashi, Toshimori

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Multivariate analysis of ecological data has been applied to environmental analysis and evaluation. Recently, some ecologists reported that classification and regression trees (CART) are ideally suited for the analysis of complex ecological data. We use classification tree to analyze the relationship between avian species composition and habitat conditions from 37 study plots located in a riparian area of the Tama-gawa River, Tokyo. The data were comprised of census data of birds and vegetation structural information. First, the study plots were classified by TWINSPAN based on the avian species composition. Then, we tried to recover the grouping of the study plots by classification tree or canonical discriminant analysis using the vegetation structural information so that we could find the relationship between avian species composition and vegetation structure. Classification tree analysis performed almost as well as canonical discriminant analysis. Classification tree models explain variation of a single response variable (here, avian fauna type) by repeatedly splitting the study plots into more homogeneous groups, using combinations of explanatory variables (here, vegetation structural parameters). This structure is simple, suitable for dealing with high-order interactions, so that classification tree can give easily interpretable results. Finally, based on the comparison of classification tree and canonical discriminant analysis, we concluded that classification tree was more suitable than discriminant analysis for landscape evaluation and planning.

AB - Multivariate analysis of ecological data has been applied to environmental analysis and evaluation. Recently, some ecologists reported that classification and regression trees (CART) are ideally suited for the analysis of complex ecological data. We use classification tree to analyze the relationship between avian species composition and habitat conditions from 37 study plots located in a riparian area of the Tama-gawa River, Tokyo. The data were comprised of census data of birds and vegetation structural information. First, the study plots were classified by TWINSPAN based on the avian species composition. Then, we tried to recover the grouping of the study plots by classification tree or canonical discriminant analysis using the vegetation structural information so that we could find the relationship between avian species composition and vegetation structure. Classification tree analysis performed almost as well as canonical discriminant analysis. Classification tree models explain variation of a single response variable (here, avian fauna type) by repeatedly splitting the study plots into more homogeneous groups, using combinations of explanatory variables (here, vegetation structural parameters). This structure is simple, suitable for dealing with high-order interactions, so that classification tree can give easily interpretable results. Finally, based on the comparison of classification tree and canonical discriminant analysis, we concluded that classification tree was more suitable than discriminant analysis for landscape evaluation and planning.

KW - classification trees

KW - discriminant analysis

KW - landscape planning

KW - species composition

KW - vegetation structure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999467476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999467476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3825/ece.5.189

DO - 10.3825/ece.5.189

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84999467476

VL - 5

SP - 189

EP - 201

JO - Ecology and Civil Engineering

JF - Ecology and Civil Engineering

SN - 1344-3755

IS - 2

ER -