Clinical advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancers in remnant stomach surpass conventional endoscopic mucosal resection

Shu Hoteya, Toshiro Iizuka, Daisuke Kikuchi, Naohisa Yahagi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection was developed to address the shortcomings of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. The present study evaluated the benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of neoplasms arising from the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Methods: This study, which was designed as a historical control study, evaluated 22 gastric cancers in remnant cancers treated by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and another 40 cancers treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Results: Patient characteristic between the two groups were not different except for tumor size, which was larger in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The local complete resection rate and the curative resection rate were significantly higher in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group compared to those in the mucosal resection group (95.0% vs 40.9% and 80.0% vs 40.9%, respectively). Complication rate showed no significant difference in the two groups, although submucosal dissection required a longer operation time. Conclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection represents a reliable treatment for gastric cancers in the remnant stomach, surpassing endoscopic mucosal resection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-20
Number of pages4
JournalDigestive Endoscopy
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastric Stump
Stomach Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Esophagectomy
Gastrectomy
Dissection

Keywords

  • Complete resection
  • Curative resection
  • Esophagectomy
  • Gastrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Clinical advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancers in remnant stomach surpass conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. / Hoteya, Shu; Iizuka, Toshiro; Kikuchi, Daisuke; Yahagi, Naohisa.

In: Digestive Endoscopy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 17-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3423ff88415042b2a8ad847d4e203ff6,
title = "Clinical advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancers in remnant stomach surpass conventional endoscopic mucosal resection",
abstract = "Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection was developed to address the shortcomings of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. The present study evaluated the benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of neoplasms arising from the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Methods: This study, which was designed as a historical control study, evaluated 22 gastric cancers in remnant cancers treated by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and another 40 cancers treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Results: Patient characteristic between the two groups were not different except for tumor size, which was larger in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The local complete resection rate and the curative resection rate were significantly higher in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group compared to those in the mucosal resection group (95.0{\%} vs 40.9{\%} and 80.0{\%} vs 40.9{\%}, respectively). Complication rate showed no significant difference in the two groups, although submucosal dissection required a longer operation time. Conclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection represents a reliable treatment for gastric cancers in the remnant stomach, surpassing endoscopic mucosal resection.",
keywords = "Complete resection, Curative resection, Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy",
author = "Shu Hoteya and Toshiro Iizuka and Daisuke Kikuchi and Naohisa Yahagi",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00912.x",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "17--20",
journal = "Digestive Endoscopy",
issn = "0915-5635",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancers in remnant stomach surpass conventional endoscopic mucosal resection

AU - Hoteya, Shu

AU - Iizuka, Toshiro

AU - Kikuchi, Daisuke

AU - Yahagi, Naohisa

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection was developed to address the shortcomings of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. The present study evaluated the benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of neoplasms arising from the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Methods: This study, which was designed as a historical control study, evaluated 22 gastric cancers in remnant cancers treated by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and another 40 cancers treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Results: Patient characteristic between the two groups were not different except for tumor size, which was larger in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The local complete resection rate and the curative resection rate were significantly higher in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group compared to those in the mucosal resection group (95.0% vs 40.9% and 80.0% vs 40.9%, respectively). Complication rate showed no significant difference in the two groups, although submucosal dissection required a longer operation time. Conclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection represents a reliable treatment for gastric cancers in the remnant stomach, surpassing endoscopic mucosal resection.

AB - Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection was developed to address the shortcomings of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. The present study evaluated the benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of neoplasms arising from the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Methods: This study, which was designed as a historical control study, evaluated 22 gastric cancers in remnant cancers treated by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and another 40 cancers treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Results: Patient characteristic between the two groups were not different except for tumor size, which was larger in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The local complete resection rate and the curative resection rate were significantly higher in the endoscopic submucosal dissection group compared to those in the mucosal resection group (95.0% vs 40.9% and 80.0% vs 40.9%, respectively). Complication rate showed no significant difference in the two groups, although submucosal dissection required a longer operation time. Conclusion: Endoscopic submucosal dissection represents a reliable treatment for gastric cancers in the remnant stomach, surpassing endoscopic mucosal resection.

KW - Complete resection

KW - Curative resection

KW - Esophagectomy

KW - Gastrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049146172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049146172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00912.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00912.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20078659

AN - SCOPUS:74049146172

VL - 22

SP - 17

EP - 20

JO - Digestive Endoscopy

JF - Digestive Endoscopy

SN - 0915-5635

IS - 1

ER -