Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle

Tomonari Kinoshita, Hideki Ujiie, Joerg Schwock, Kosuke Fujino, Christine McDonald, Chang Young Lee, Alexander Gregor, Chung Chun Tyan, Simon Houston, Kasia Czarnecka-Kujwa, Hisao Asamura, Kazuhiro Yasufuku

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established modality for the assessment of mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. To overcome the sampling limitations of standard 21- and 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needles, a new flexible 19-gauge (Flex 19G) needle was developed. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA sampling with the Flex 19G needle. A 22G needle was always used first for cytology, followed by a Flex 19G needle, either an early version (Oct/2014-Sep/2015) or a final version needle (May/2016-Jan/2017), for tissue sampling. The success rate of obtaining samples, specimen quantity, and safety were evaluated and compared. Results: All sampling procedures in 45 patients and 82 targets were performed without complication and the overall diagnostic yield from cytology was 100%. Furthermore, 28% of Flex 19G samples were sufficient for histopathological diagnosis. Yield improved with an increased number of passes and if the target was larger. Compared to the early version evaluated in 52 targets, the final version of the Flex 19G needle evaluated in 30 targets provided significantly larger volume samples and more frequent diagnostic cores. Tissue obtained with the Flex 19G needle retained cohesiveness to a larger degree and was of higher cellularity compared to cytological samples processed as cell blocks. Conclusions: The Flex 19G is safe and provides larger volumetric and cohesive tissue samples that are appropriate for histopathological processing. The final version of the Flex 19G could be a good choice in selected cases where greater tissue acquisition is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2388-2396
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Thoracic Disease
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Needles
Cell Biology
Safety

Keywords

  • Cytology
  • Diagnostic bronchoscopy
  • Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)
  • Flexible 19G EBUS needle
  • Histopathology
  • Tissue sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Kinoshita, T., Ujiie, H., Schwock, J., Fujino, K., McDonald, C., Lee, C. Y., ... Yasufuku, K. (2018). Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(4), 2388-2396. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.50

Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle. / Kinoshita, Tomonari; Ujiie, Hideki; Schwock, Joerg; Fujino, Kosuke; McDonald, Christine; Lee, Chang Young; Gregor, Alexander; Tyan, Chung Chun; Houston, Simon; Czarnecka-Kujwa, Kasia; Asamura, Hisao; Yasufuku, Kazuhiro.

In: Journal of Thoracic Disease, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 2388-2396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kinoshita, T, Ujiie, H, Schwock, J, Fujino, K, McDonald, C, Lee, CY, Gregor, A, Tyan, CC, Houston, S, Czarnecka-Kujwa, K, Asamura, H & Yasufuku, K 2018, 'Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle', Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2388-2396. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.50
Kinoshita T, Ujiie H, Schwock J, Fujino K, McDonald C, Lee CY et al. Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018 Apr 1;10(4):2388-2396. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.50
Kinoshita, Tomonari ; Ujiie, Hideki ; Schwock, Joerg ; Fujino, Kosuke ; McDonald, Christine ; Lee, Chang Young ; Gregor, Alexander ; Tyan, Chung Chun ; Houston, Simon ; Czarnecka-Kujwa, Kasia ; Asamura, Hisao ; Yasufuku, Kazuhiro. / Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle. In: Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 2388-2396.
@article{27b23eba903c4d0981f4add3f68bb27a,
title = "Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle",
abstract = "Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established modality for the assessment of mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. To overcome the sampling limitations of standard 21- and 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needles, a new flexible 19-gauge (Flex 19G) needle was developed. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA sampling with the Flex 19G needle. A 22G needle was always used first for cytology, followed by a Flex 19G needle, either an early version (Oct/2014-Sep/2015) or a final version needle (May/2016-Jan/2017), for tissue sampling. The success rate of obtaining samples, specimen quantity, and safety were evaluated and compared. Results: All sampling procedures in 45 patients and 82 targets were performed without complication and the overall diagnostic yield from cytology was 100{\%}. Furthermore, 28{\%} of Flex 19G samples were sufficient for histopathological diagnosis. Yield improved with an increased number of passes and if the target was larger. Compared to the early version evaluated in 52 targets, the final version of the Flex 19G needle evaluated in 30 targets provided significantly larger volume samples and more frequent diagnostic cores. Tissue obtained with the Flex 19G needle retained cohesiveness to a larger degree and was of higher cellularity compared to cytological samples processed as cell blocks. Conclusions: The Flex 19G is safe and provides larger volumetric and cohesive tissue samples that are appropriate for histopathological processing. The final version of the Flex 19G could be a good choice in selected cases where greater tissue acquisition is required.",
keywords = "Cytology, Diagnostic bronchoscopy, Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), Flexible 19G EBUS needle, Histopathology, Tissue sampling",
author = "Tomonari Kinoshita and Hideki Ujiie and Joerg Schwock and Kosuke Fujino and Christine McDonald and Lee, {Chang Young} and Alexander Gregor and Tyan, {Chung Chun} and Simon Houston and Kasia Czarnecka-Kujwa and Hisao Asamura and Kazuhiro Yasufuku",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21037/jtd.2018.04.50",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "2388--2396",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Disease",
issn = "2072-1439",
publisher = "Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company (PBPC)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical evaluation of the utility of a flexible 19-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle

AU - Kinoshita, Tomonari

AU - Ujiie, Hideki

AU - Schwock, Joerg

AU - Fujino, Kosuke

AU - McDonald, Christine

AU - Lee, Chang Young

AU - Gregor, Alexander

AU - Tyan, Chung Chun

AU - Houston, Simon

AU - Czarnecka-Kujwa, Kasia

AU - Asamura, Hisao

AU - Yasufuku, Kazuhiro

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established modality for the assessment of mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. To overcome the sampling limitations of standard 21- and 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needles, a new flexible 19-gauge (Flex 19G) needle was developed. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA sampling with the Flex 19G needle. A 22G needle was always used first for cytology, followed by a Flex 19G needle, either an early version (Oct/2014-Sep/2015) or a final version needle (May/2016-Jan/2017), for tissue sampling. The success rate of obtaining samples, specimen quantity, and safety were evaluated and compared. Results: All sampling procedures in 45 patients and 82 targets were performed without complication and the overall diagnostic yield from cytology was 100%. Furthermore, 28% of Flex 19G samples were sufficient for histopathological diagnosis. Yield improved with an increased number of passes and if the target was larger. Compared to the early version evaluated in 52 targets, the final version of the Flex 19G needle evaluated in 30 targets provided significantly larger volume samples and more frequent diagnostic cores. Tissue obtained with the Flex 19G needle retained cohesiveness to a larger degree and was of higher cellularity compared to cytological samples processed as cell blocks. Conclusions: The Flex 19G is safe and provides larger volumetric and cohesive tissue samples that are appropriate for histopathological processing. The final version of the Flex 19G could be a good choice in selected cases where greater tissue acquisition is required.

AB - Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established modality for the assessment of mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. To overcome the sampling limitations of standard 21- and 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needles, a new flexible 19-gauge (Flex 19G) needle was developed. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA sampling with the Flex 19G needle. A 22G needle was always used first for cytology, followed by a Flex 19G needle, either an early version (Oct/2014-Sep/2015) or a final version needle (May/2016-Jan/2017), for tissue sampling. The success rate of obtaining samples, specimen quantity, and safety were evaluated and compared. Results: All sampling procedures in 45 patients and 82 targets were performed without complication and the overall diagnostic yield from cytology was 100%. Furthermore, 28% of Flex 19G samples were sufficient for histopathological diagnosis. Yield improved with an increased number of passes and if the target was larger. Compared to the early version evaluated in 52 targets, the final version of the Flex 19G needle evaluated in 30 targets provided significantly larger volume samples and more frequent diagnostic cores. Tissue obtained with the Flex 19G needle retained cohesiveness to a larger degree and was of higher cellularity compared to cytological samples processed as cell blocks. Conclusions: The Flex 19G is safe and provides larger volumetric and cohesive tissue samples that are appropriate for histopathological processing. The final version of the Flex 19G could be a good choice in selected cases where greater tissue acquisition is required.

KW - Cytology

KW - Diagnostic bronchoscopy

KW - Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)

KW - Flexible 19G EBUS needle

KW - Histopathology

KW - Tissue sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046971733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046971733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.50

DO - 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.50

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046971733

VL - 10

SP - 2388

EP - 2396

JO - Journal of Thoracic Disease

JF - Journal of Thoracic Disease

SN - 2072-1439

IS - 4

ER -