Coding for multi-pulse PPM with imperfect slot synchronization in optical direct-detection channels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance of coded multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) consisting of m slots and 2 pulses, denoted as (m, 2) MPPM, with imperfect slot synchronization is analyzed. Convolutional codes and Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are employed for (m, 2) MPPM, and the bit error probability of coded (m, 2) MPPM in the presence of the timing offset is derived. In each coded (m, 2) MPPM, we compare the performance of some different code rate systems. Moreover, we compare the performance of both systems at the same information bit rate. It is shown that in both coded systems, the performance of code rate-1/2 coded (m, 2) MPPM is the best when the timing offset is small. When the timing offset is somewhat large, however, uncoded (m, 2) MPPM is shown to perform better than coded (m, 2) MPPM. Further, convolutional coded (m, 2) MPPM with the constraint length k≥7 is shown to perform better than RS coded (m, 2) MPPM for the same code rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)916-922
Number of pages7
JournalIEICE Transactions on Communications
VolumeE78-B
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1995 Jun

Fingerprint

Pulse position modulation
Synchronization
Reed-Solomon codes
Convolutional codes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Coding for multi-pulse PPM with imperfect slot synchronization in optical direct-detection channels. / Sato, Kazumi; Ohtsuki, Tomoaki; Sasase, Iwao.

In: IEICE Transactions on Communications, Vol. E78-B, No. 6, 06.1995, p. 916-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9fe0133fc0f4edf923e8737c5988acd,
title = "Coding for multi-pulse PPM with imperfect slot synchronization in optical direct-detection channels",
abstract = "The performance of coded multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) consisting of m slots and 2 pulses, denoted as (m, 2) MPPM, with imperfect slot synchronization is analyzed. Convolutional codes and Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are employed for (m, 2) MPPM, and the bit error probability of coded (m, 2) MPPM in the presence of the timing offset is derived. In each coded (m, 2) MPPM, we compare the performance of some different code rate systems. Moreover, we compare the performance of both systems at the same information bit rate. It is shown that in both coded systems, the performance of code rate-1/2 coded (m, 2) MPPM is the best when the timing offset is small. When the timing offset is somewhat large, however, uncoded (m, 2) MPPM is shown to perform better than coded (m, 2) MPPM. Further, convolutional coded (m, 2) MPPM with the constraint length k≥7 is shown to perform better than RS coded (m, 2) MPPM for the same code rate.",
author = "Kazumi Sato and Tomoaki Ohtsuki and Iwao Sasase",
year = "1995",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "E78-B",
pages = "916--922",
journal = "IEICE Transactions on Communications",
issn = "0916-8516",
publisher = "Maruzen Co., Ltd/Maruzen Kabushikikaisha",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coding for multi-pulse PPM with imperfect slot synchronization in optical direct-detection channels

AU - Sato, Kazumi

AU - Ohtsuki, Tomoaki

AU - Sasase, Iwao

PY - 1995/6

Y1 - 1995/6

N2 - The performance of coded multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) consisting of m slots and 2 pulses, denoted as (m, 2) MPPM, with imperfect slot synchronization is analyzed. Convolutional codes and Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are employed for (m, 2) MPPM, and the bit error probability of coded (m, 2) MPPM in the presence of the timing offset is derived. In each coded (m, 2) MPPM, we compare the performance of some different code rate systems. Moreover, we compare the performance of both systems at the same information bit rate. It is shown that in both coded systems, the performance of code rate-1/2 coded (m, 2) MPPM is the best when the timing offset is small. When the timing offset is somewhat large, however, uncoded (m, 2) MPPM is shown to perform better than coded (m, 2) MPPM. Further, convolutional coded (m, 2) MPPM with the constraint length k≥7 is shown to perform better than RS coded (m, 2) MPPM for the same code rate.

AB - The performance of coded multi-pulse pulse position modulation (MPPM) consisting of m slots and 2 pulses, denoted as (m, 2) MPPM, with imperfect slot synchronization is analyzed. Convolutional codes and Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are employed for (m, 2) MPPM, and the bit error probability of coded (m, 2) MPPM in the presence of the timing offset is derived. In each coded (m, 2) MPPM, we compare the performance of some different code rate systems. Moreover, we compare the performance of both systems at the same information bit rate. It is shown that in both coded systems, the performance of code rate-1/2 coded (m, 2) MPPM is the best when the timing offset is small. When the timing offset is somewhat large, however, uncoded (m, 2) MPPM is shown to perform better than coded (m, 2) MPPM. Further, convolutional coded (m, 2) MPPM with the constraint length k≥7 is shown to perform better than RS coded (m, 2) MPPM for the same code rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029323533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029323533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - E78-B

SP - 916

EP - 922

JO - IEICE Transactions on Communications

JF - IEICE Transactions on Communications

SN - 0916-8516

IS - 6

ER -