Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region

Jun Muto, Daniel M. Prevedello, Leo F.S.Ditzel Filho, Ing Ping Tang, Kenichi Oyama, Edward E. Kerr, Bradley A. Otto, Takeshi Kawase, Kazunari Yoshida, Ricardo L. Carrau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers direct access to midline skull base lesions, and the anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) stands out as a method for granting entry into the upper and middle clival areas. This study evaluated the feasibility of performing EEA for tumors located in the petroclival region in comparison with ATPA. methods On 8 embalmed cadaver heads, EEA to the petroclival region was performed utilizing a 4-mm endoscope with either 0° or 30° lenses, and an ATPA was performed under microscopic visualization. A comparison was executed based on measurements of 5 heads (10 sides). Case illustrations were utilized to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of EEA and ATPA when dealing with petroclival conditions. results Extradurally, EEA allows direct access to the medial petrous apex, which is limited by the petrous and paraclival internal carotid artery (ICA) segments laterally. The ATPA offers direct access to the petrous apex, which is blocked by the petrous ICA and abducens nerve inferiorly. Intradurally, the EEA allows a direct view of the areas medial to the cisternal segment of cranial nerve VI with limited lateral exposure. ATPA offers excellent access to the cistern between cranial nerves III and VIII. The quantitative analysis demonstrated that the EEA corridor could be expanded laterally with an angled drill up to 1.8 times wider than the bone window between both paraclival ICA segments. conclusions The midline, horizontal line of the petrous ICA segment, paraclival ICA segment, and the abducens nerve are the main landmarks used to decide which approach to the petroclival region to select. The EEA is superior to the ATPA for accessing lesions medial or caudal to the abducens nerve, such as chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and midclival meningiomas. The ATPA is superior to lesions located posterior and/or lateral to the paraclival ICA segment and lesions with extension to the middle fossa and/or infratemporal fossa. The EEA and ATPA are complementary and can be used independently or in combination with each other in order to approach complex petroclival lesions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1171-1186
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume125
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Internal Carotid Artery
Abducens Nerve
Vestibulocochlear Nerve
Head
Oculomotor Nerve
Chordoma
Mandrillus
Chondrosarcoma
Endoscopes
Skull Base
Feasibility Studies
Meningioma
Cadaver
Lenses
Bone and Bones
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Anterior transpetrosal approach
  • Cranial base
  • Endoscopic endonasal approach
  • Petroclival lesion
  • Skull base

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Muto, J., Prevedello, D. M., Filho, L. F. S. D., Tang, I. P., Oyama, K., Kerr, E. E., ... Carrau, R. L. (2016). Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region. Journal of Neurosurgery, 125(5), 1171-1186. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.JNS15302

Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region. / Muto, Jun; Prevedello, Daniel M.; Filho, Leo F.S.Ditzel; Tang, Ing Ping; Oyama, Kenichi; Kerr, Edward E.; Otto, Bradley A.; Kawase, Takeshi; Yoshida, Kazunari; Carrau, Ricardo L.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 125, No. 5, 01.11.2016, p. 1171-1186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muto, J, Prevedello, DM, Filho, LFSD, Tang, IP, Oyama, K, Kerr, EE, Otto, BA, Kawase, T, Yoshida, K & Carrau, RL 2016, 'Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region', Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 1171-1186. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.JNS15302
Muto, Jun ; Prevedello, Daniel M. ; Filho, Leo F.S.Ditzel ; Tang, Ing Ping ; Oyama, Kenichi ; Kerr, Edward E. ; Otto, Bradley A. ; Kawase, Takeshi ; Yoshida, Kazunari ; Carrau, Ricardo L. / Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region. In: Journal of Neurosurgery. 2016 ; Vol. 125, No. 5. pp. 1171-1186.
@article{2c82ed0ee25e43a091d5d9a4da96d749,
title = "Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region",
abstract = "Objective The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers direct access to midline skull base lesions, and the anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) stands out as a method for granting entry into the upper and middle clival areas. This study evaluated the feasibility of performing EEA for tumors located in the petroclival region in comparison with ATPA. methods On 8 embalmed cadaver heads, EEA to the petroclival region was performed utilizing a 4-mm endoscope with either 0° or 30° lenses, and an ATPA was performed under microscopic visualization. A comparison was executed based on measurements of 5 heads (10 sides). Case illustrations were utilized to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of EEA and ATPA when dealing with petroclival conditions. results Extradurally, EEA allows direct access to the medial petrous apex, which is limited by the petrous and paraclival internal carotid artery (ICA) segments laterally. The ATPA offers direct access to the petrous apex, which is blocked by the petrous ICA and abducens nerve inferiorly. Intradurally, the EEA allows a direct view of the areas medial to the cisternal segment of cranial nerve VI with limited lateral exposure. ATPA offers excellent access to the cistern between cranial nerves III and VIII. The quantitative analysis demonstrated that the EEA corridor could be expanded laterally with an angled drill up to 1.8 times wider than the bone window between both paraclival ICA segments. conclusions The midline, horizontal line of the petrous ICA segment, paraclival ICA segment, and the abducens nerve are the main landmarks used to decide which approach to the petroclival region to select. The EEA is superior to the ATPA for accessing lesions medial or caudal to the abducens nerve, such as chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and midclival meningiomas. The ATPA is superior to lesions located posterior and/or lateral to the paraclival ICA segment and lesions with extension to the middle fossa and/or infratemporal fossa. The EEA and ATPA are complementary and can be used independently or in combination with each other in order to approach complex petroclival lesions.",
keywords = "Anterior transpetrosal approach, Cranial base, Endoscopic endonasal approach, Petroclival lesion, Skull base",
author = "Jun Muto and Prevedello, {Daniel M.} and Filho, {Leo F.S.Ditzel} and Tang, {Ing Ping} and Kenichi Oyama and Kerr, {Edward E.} and Otto, {Bradley A.} and Takeshi Kawase and Kazunari Yoshida and Carrau, {Ricardo L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2015.8.JNS15302",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "1171--1186",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region

AU - Muto, Jun

AU - Prevedello, Daniel M.

AU - Filho, Leo F.S.Ditzel

AU - Tang, Ing Ping

AU - Oyama, Kenichi

AU - Kerr, Edward E.

AU - Otto, Bradley A.

AU - Kawase, Takeshi

AU - Yoshida, Kazunari

AU - Carrau, Ricardo L.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Objective The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers direct access to midline skull base lesions, and the anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) stands out as a method for granting entry into the upper and middle clival areas. This study evaluated the feasibility of performing EEA for tumors located in the petroclival region in comparison with ATPA. methods On 8 embalmed cadaver heads, EEA to the petroclival region was performed utilizing a 4-mm endoscope with either 0° or 30° lenses, and an ATPA was performed under microscopic visualization. A comparison was executed based on measurements of 5 heads (10 sides). Case illustrations were utilized to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of EEA and ATPA when dealing with petroclival conditions. results Extradurally, EEA allows direct access to the medial petrous apex, which is limited by the petrous and paraclival internal carotid artery (ICA) segments laterally. The ATPA offers direct access to the petrous apex, which is blocked by the petrous ICA and abducens nerve inferiorly. Intradurally, the EEA allows a direct view of the areas medial to the cisternal segment of cranial nerve VI with limited lateral exposure. ATPA offers excellent access to the cistern between cranial nerves III and VIII. The quantitative analysis demonstrated that the EEA corridor could be expanded laterally with an angled drill up to 1.8 times wider than the bone window between both paraclival ICA segments. conclusions The midline, horizontal line of the petrous ICA segment, paraclival ICA segment, and the abducens nerve are the main landmarks used to decide which approach to the petroclival region to select. The EEA is superior to the ATPA for accessing lesions medial or caudal to the abducens nerve, such as chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and midclival meningiomas. The ATPA is superior to lesions located posterior and/or lateral to the paraclival ICA segment and lesions with extension to the middle fossa and/or infratemporal fossa. The EEA and ATPA are complementary and can be used independently or in combination with each other in order to approach complex petroclival lesions.

AB - Objective The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers direct access to midline skull base lesions, and the anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) stands out as a method for granting entry into the upper and middle clival areas. This study evaluated the feasibility of performing EEA for tumors located in the petroclival region in comparison with ATPA. methods On 8 embalmed cadaver heads, EEA to the petroclival region was performed utilizing a 4-mm endoscope with either 0° or 30° lenses, and an ATPA was performed under microscopic visualization. A comparison was executed based on measurements of 5 heads (10 sides). Case illustrations were utilized to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of EEA and ATPA when dealing with petroclival conditions. results Extradurally, EEA allows direct access to the medial petrous apex, which is limited by the petrous and paraclival internal carotid artery (ICA) segments laterally. The ATPA offers direct access to the petrous apex, which is blocked by the petrous ICA and abducens nerve inferiorly. Intradurally, the EEA allows a direct view of the areas medial to the cisternal segment of cranial nerve VI with limited lateral exposure. ATPA offers excellent access to the cistern between cranial nerves III and VIII. The quantitative analysis demonstrated that the EEA corridor could be expanded laterally with an angled drill up to 1.8 times wider than the bone window between both paraclival ICA segments. conclusions The midline, horizontal line of the petrous ICA segment, paraclival ICA segment, and the abducens nerve are the main landmarks used to decide which approach to the petroclival region to select. The EEA is superior to the ATPA for accessing lesions medial or caudal to the abducens nerve, such as chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and midclival meningiomas. The ATPA is superior to lesions located posterior and/or lateral to the paraclival ICA segment and lesions with extension to the middle fossa and/or infratemporal fossa. The EEA and ATPA are complementary and can be used independently or in combination with each other in order to approach complex petroclival lesions.

KW - Anterior transpetrosal approach

KW - Cranial base

KW - Endoscopic endonasal approach

KW - Petroclival lesion

KW - Skull base

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018193768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018193768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2015.8.JNS15302

DO - 10.3171/2015.8.JNS15302

M3 - Article

C2 - 26848916

AN - SCOPUS:85018193768

VL - 125

SP - 1171

EP - 1186

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 5

ER -