Comparing a forced-choice wug test and a naturalness rating test: An exploration using rendaku

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A growing body of linguistic studies is now deploying judgment experiments to probe both syntactic and phonological knowledge. Thus a research question arises as to what kind of judgment format is useful for probing our linguistic knowledge. Against this theoretical background, this study compares two types of phonological judgment experimentation: a scale-based naturalness judgment task and a forced-choice wug test. The current analysis uses the data from two previously published studies on rendaku, a famous voicing phenomenon found in Japanese compound formation, and Lyman's Law, which is known to inhibit rendaku. Although the two tasks at first sight show a close correlation with each other, a detailed examination of the data shows that the forced-choice wug-test reveals the influence of Lyman's Law on rendaku more clearly than the naturalness judgment experiment. To the extent that the effect of Lyman's Law is real, the current comparison shows that a forced-choice wug experiment is better than a naturalness judgment experiment. While the impact of the current results is limited and modest, this study provides a first step toward understanding how different tasks in phonological experimentation may compare to one another. It is hoped that the current study will plant a seed for a research program which addresses which kind of phonological judgment experimentation is best-suited to reveal our phonological knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-47
Number of pages6
JournalLanguage Sciences
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 1

Fingerprint

rating
experiment
Law
linguistics
examination
Rendaku
Rating
Naturalness
Experiment
Experimentation

Keywords

  • Japanese
  • Lyman's Law
  • Phonological experiment
  • Phonology
  • Rendaku

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Comparing a forced-choice wug test and a naturalness rating test : An exploration using rendaku. / Kawahara, Shigeto.

In: Language Sciences, Vol. 48, 01.03.2015, p. 42-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c0ae1e0e91e42cebaf6ddf1ad4eb8d8,
title = "Comparing a forced-choice wug test and a naturalness rating test: An exploration using rendaku",
abstract = "A growing body of linguistic studies is now deploying judgment experiments to probe both syntactic and phonological knowledge. Thus a research question arises as to what kind of judgment format is useful for probing our linguistic knowledge. Against this theoretical background, this study compares two types of phonological judgment experimentation: a scale-based naturalness judgment task and a forced-choice wug test. The current analysis uses the data from two previously published studies on rendaku, a famous voicing phenomenon found in Japanese compound formation, and Lyman's Law, which is known to inhibit rendaku. Although the two tasks at first sight show a close correlation with each other, a detailed examination of the data shows that the forced-choice wug-test reveals the influence of Lyman's Law on rendaku more clearly than the naturalness judgment experiment. To the extent that the effect of Lyman's Law is real, the current comparison shows that a forced-choice wug experiment is better than a naturalness judgment experiment. While the impact of the current results is limited and modest, this study provides a first step toward understanding how different tasks in phonological experimentation may compare to one another. It is hoped that the current study will plant a seed for a research program which addresses which kind of phonological judgment experimentation is best-suited to reveal our phonological knowledge.",
keywords = "Japanese, Lyman's Law, Phonological experiment, Phonology, Rendaku",
author = "Shigeto Kawahara",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "Language Sciences",
issn = "0388-0001",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing a forced-choice wug test and a naturalness rating test

T2 - An exploration using rendaku

AU - Kawahara, Shigeto

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - A growing body of linguistic studies is now deploying judgment experiments to probe both syntactic and phonological knowledge. Thus a research question arises as to what kind of judgment format is useful for probing our linguistic knowledge. Against this theoretical background, this study compares two types of phonological judgment experimentation: a scale-based naturalness judgment task and a forced-choice wug test. The current analysis uses the data from two previously published studies on rendaku, a famous voicing phenomenon found in Japanese compound formation, and Lyman's Law, which is known to inhibit rendaku. Although the two tasks at first sight show a close correlation with each other, a detailed examination of the data shows that the forced-choice wug-test reveals the influence of Lyman's Law on rendaku more clearly than the naturalness judgment experiment. To the extent that the effect of Lyman's Law is real, the current comparison shows that a forced-choice wug experiment is better than a naturalness judgment experiment. While the impact of the current results is limited and modest, this study provides a first step toward understanding how different tasks in phonological experimentation may compare to one another. It is hoped that the current study will plant a seed for a research program which addresses which kind of phonological judgment experimentation is best-suited to reveal our phonological knowledge.

AB - A growing body of linguistic studies is now deploying judgment experiments to probe both syntactic and phonological knowledge. Thus a research question arises as to what kind of judgment format is useful for probing our linguistic knowledge. Against this theoretical background, this study compares two types of phonological judgment experimentation: a scale-based naturalness judgment task and a forced-choice wug test. The current analysis uses the data from two previously published studies on rendaku, a famous voicing phenomenon found in Japanese compound formation, and Lyman's Law, which is known to inhibit rendaku. Although the two tasks at first sight show a close correlation with each other, a detailed examination of the data shows that the forced-choice wug-test reveals the influence of Lyman's Law on rendaku more clearly than the naturalness judgment experiment. To the extent that the effect of Lyman's Law is real, the current comparison shows that a forced-choice wug experiment is better than a naturalness judgment experiment. While the impact of the current results is limited and modest, this study provides a first step toward understanding how different tasks in phonological experimentation may compare to one another. It is hoped that the current study will plant a seed for a research program which addresses which kind of phonological judgment experimentation is best-suited to reveal our phonological knowledge.

KW - Japanese

KW - Lyman's Law

KW - Phonological experiment

KW - Phonology

KW - Rendaku

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922387313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922387313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922387313

VL - 48

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - Language Sciences

JF - Language Sciences

SN - 0388-0001

ER -