Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study

Maiku Ogawa, Hiromitsu Ohmori

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

2 control strategies were compared: The pulse frequency control and the pulse width control. The model used in this study is a combination of 2 models Riener et al. proposed: force output model and knee angle output model. Because there were no specific details about the pulse generator, we made a model that can fire pulse with different rates. We used NN as a feed forward and Gain Scheduling PID as feedback controller for control strategy. For comparison, a proposed fatigue cost function and tracking error function were used. As a result frequency control suppressed the fatigue more but the pulse width control had better tracking performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the SICE Annual Conference
Pages1393-1397
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event2013 52nd Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2013 - Nagoya, Japan
Duration: 2013 Sep 142013 Sep 17

Other

Other2013 52nd Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2013
CountryJapan
CityNagoya
Period13/9/1413/9/17

Fingerprint

Fatigue of materials
Pulse generators
Cost functions
Fires
Scheduling
Feedback
Controllers

Keywords

  • Biological and physiological engineering
  • Neural networks
  • Nonlinear control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Ogawa, M., & Ohmori, H. (2013). Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study. In Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference (pp. 1393-1397)

Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study. / Ogawa, Maiku; Ohmori, Hiromitsu.

Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. 2013. p. 1393-1397.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ogawa, M & Ohmori, H 2013, Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study. in Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. pp. 1393-1397, 2013 52nd Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE 2013, Nagoya, Japan, 13/9/14.
Ogawa M, Ohmori H. Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study. In Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. 2013. p. 1393-1397
Ogawa, Maiku ; Ohmori, Hiromitsu. / Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study. Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference. 2013. pp. 1393-1397
@inproceedings{63550c98f8754c3d8275251c36b6cb4f,
title = "Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study",
abstract = "2 control strategies were compared: The pulse frequency control and the pulse width control. The model used in this study is a combination of 2 models Riener et al. proposed: force output model and knee angle output model. Because there were no specific details about the pulse generator, we made a model that can fire pulse with different rates. We used NN as a feed forward and Gain Scheduling PID as feedback controller for control strategy. For comparison, a proposed fatigue cost function and tracking error function were used. As a result frequency control suppressed the fatigue more but the pulse width control had better tracking performance.",
keywords = "Biological and physiological engineering, Neural networks, Nonlinear control",
author = "Maiku Ogawa and Hiromitsu Ohmori",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
pages = "1393--1397",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of FES between pulse frequency and width control based on simulation study

AU - Ogawa, Maiku

AU - Ohmori, Hiromitsu

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - 2 control strategies were compared: The pulse frequency control and the pulse width control. The model used in this study is a combination of 2 models Riener et al. proposed: force output model and knee angle output model. Because there were no specific details about the pulse generator, we made a model that can fire pulse with different rates. We used NN as a feed forward and Gain Scheduling PID as feedback controller for control strategy. For comparison, a proposed fatigue cost function and tracking error function were used. As a result frequency control suppressed the fatigue more but the pulse width control had better tracking performance.

AB - 2 control strategies were compared: The pulse frequency control and the pulse width control. The model used in this study is a combination of 2 models Riener et al. proposed: force output model and knee angle output model. Because there were no specific details about the pulse generator, we made a model that can fire pulse with different rates. We used NN as a feed forward and Gain Scheduling PID as feedback controller for control strategy. For comparison, a proposed fatigue cost function and tracking error function were used. As a result frequency control suppressed the fatigue more but the pulse width control had better tracking performance.

KW - Biological and physiological engineering

KW - Neural networks

KW - Nonlinear control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888595038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888595038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84888595038

SP - 1393

EP - 1397

BT - Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference

ER -