Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile

Yoshiko Hori-Komai, Ikuko Toda, Naoko Asano-Kato, Mitsutoshi Ito, Takahiro Yamamoto, Kazuo Tsubota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare a new ablation algorithm termed the optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) with the conventional laser ablation profile for correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK using OATz profile #6 or using conventional ablation profile was performed on 98 eyes of 53 patients (OATz #6 group) and 111 eyes of 66 patients (control #6 group), respectively. Further, LASIK using OATz profile #5 or using the conventional ablation profile was performed on 109 eyes of 58 patients (OATz #5 group) and 109 eyes of 75 patients (control #5 group), respectively. The effective optical zone, uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively were compared between the OATz #6 and control #6 groups and between the OATz #5 and control #5 groups. RESULTS: The effective optical zones in the OATz #6 group (6.45±0.29 mm) or OATz #5 group (6.40±0.21 mm) were significantly larger than those in the control #6 group (6.33±0.27 mm) or control #5 group (6.26±0.25 mm) (P<.01), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were similar in all groups. The changes in contrast sensitivity were significant and favored the OATz #6 (P<.01) and OATz #5 groups (P<.05). The patient satisfaction survey found no statistical difference at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the OATz profiles had better visual quality as measured by contrast sensitivity and also had larger effective optical zones as compared with those treated by the conventional ablation profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)546-555
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume22
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jun

Fingerprint

Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Control Groups
Contrast Sensitivity
Patient Satisfaction
Visual Acuity
Astigmatism
Laser Therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile. / Hori-Komai, Yoshiko; Toda, Ikuko; Asano-Kato, Naoko; Ito, Mitsutoshi; Yamamoto, Takahiro; Tsubota, Kazuo.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 546-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hori-Komai, Yoshiko ; Toda, Ikuko ; Asano-Kato, Naoko ; Ito, Mitsutoshi ; Yamamoto, Takahiro ; Tsubota, Kazuo. / Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 546-555.
@article{3ef54584df904fd0882e1eb5ae63da96,
title = "Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare a new ablation algorithm termed the optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) with the conventional laser ablation profile for correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK using OATz profile #6 or using conventional ablation profile was performed on 98 eyes of 53 patients (OATz #6 group) and 111 eyes of 66 patients (control #6 group), respectively. Further, LASIK using OATz profile #5 or using the conventional ablation profile was performed on 109 eyes of 58 patients (OATz #5 group) and 109 eyes of 75 patients (control #5 group), respectively. The effective optical zone, uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively were compared between the OATz #6 and control #6 groups and between the OATz #5 and control #5 groups. RESULTS: The effective optical zones in the OATz #6 group (6.45±0.29 mm) or OATz #5 group (6.40±0.21 mm) were significantly larger than those in the control #6 group (6.33±0.27 mm) or control #5 group (6.26±0.25 mm) (P<.01), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were similar in all groups. The changes in contrast sensitivity were significant and favored the OATz #6 (P<.01) and OATz #5 groups (P<.05). The patient satisfaction survey found no statistical difference at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the OATz profiles had better visual quality as measured by contrast sensitivity and also had larger effective optical zones as compared with those treated by the conventional ablation profile.",
author = "Yoshiko Hori-Komai and Ikuko Toda and Naoko Asano-Kato and Mitsutoshi Ito and Takahiro Yamamoto and Kazuo Tsubota",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "546--555",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0883-0444",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile

AU - Hori-Komai, Yoshiko

AU - Toda, Ikuko

AU - Asano-Kato, Naoko

AU - Ito, Mitsutoshi

AU - Yamamoto, Takahiro

AU - Tsubota, Kazuo

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare a new ablation algorithm termed the optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) with the conventional laser ablation profile for correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK using OATz profile #6 or using conventional ablation profile was performed on 98 eyes of 53 patients (OATz #6 group) and 111 eyes of 66 patients (control #6 group), respectively. Further, LASIK using OATz profile #5 or using the conventional ablation profile was performed on 109 eyes of 58 patients (OATz #5 group) and 109 eyes of 75 patients (control #5 group), respectively. The effective optical zone, uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively were compared between the OATz #6 and control #6 groups and between the OATz #5 and control #5 groups. RESULTS: The effective optical zones in the OATz #6 group (6.45±0.29 mm) or OATz #5 group (6.40±0.21 mm) were significantly larger than those in the control #6 group (6.33±0.27 mm) or control #5 group (6.26±0.25 mm) (P<.01), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were similar in all groups. The changes in contrast sensitivity were significant and favored the OATz #6 (P<.01) and OATz #5 groups (P<.05). The patient satisfaction survey found no statistical difference at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the OATz profiles had better visual quality as measured by contrast sensitivity and also had larger effective optical zones as compared with those treated by the conventional ablation profile.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare a new ablation algorithm termed the optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) with the conventional laser ablation profile for correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK using OATz profile #6 or using conventional ablation profile was performed on 98 eyes of 53 patients (OATz #6 group) and 111 eyes of 66 patients (control #6 group), respectively. Further, LASIK using OATz profile #5 or using the conventional ablation profile was performed on 109 eyes of 58 patients (OATz #5 group) and 109 eyes of 75 patients (control #5 group), respectively. The effective optical zone, uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction at 3 months postoperatively were compared between the OATz #6 and control #6 groups and between the OATz #5 and control #5 groups. RESULTS: The effective optical zones in the OATz #6 group (6.45±0.29 mm) or OATz #5 group (6.40±0.21 mm) were significantly larger than those in the control #6 group (6.33±0.27 mm) or control #5 group (6.26±0.25 mm) (P<.01), respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were similar in all groups. The changes in contrast sensitivity were significant and favored the OATz #6 (P<.01) and OATz #5 groups (P<.05). The patient satisfaction survey found no statistical difference at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the OATz profiles had better visual quality as measured by contrast sensitivity and also had larger effective optical zones as compared with those treated by the conventional ablation profile.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745220986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745220986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 546

EP - 555

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 0883-0444

IS - 6

ER -