TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of meniscal extrusion and osteophyte formation at the intercondylar notch as a predictive biomarker for incidence of knee osteoarthritis-Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative-
AU - Okada, Kentaro
AU - Yamaguchi, Satoshi
AU - Sato, Yasunori
AU - Enomoto, Takahiro
AU - Ogawa, Yuya
AU - Ohtori, Seiji
AU - Tahara, Masamichi
AU - Sasho, Takahisa
N1 - Funding Information:
T. Sasho received research grant from Pfizer Japan for this study.This manuscript was prepared using an OAI public use data set and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the OAI investigators, the NIH, or the private funding partners. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from each OAI site. Thus, additional local IRB approval was waived. T. Sasho received research grant (The Academic Contributions) from Pfizer Japan Inc. for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Background: Medial meniscal extrusion (ME) is a biomarker to predict later development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). On the other hand, we have reported osteophyte formation at the posterior condylar notch of the femur served as a biomarker for the same purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare capacity of the two biomarkers in predicting KOA development. Methods: Two cohort of knees were established utilizing publicly available data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). No OA group (NOA) consisted of knees that were grade 0 or 1 on Kellgren and Lawrence grade (K/L) both at baseline and 48 months later, and pre-radiographic-OA group (PROA) consisted of knees that were grade 0 or 1 at baseline but grade ≥2 48 months later. Baseline MR images were evaluated in terms of ME and osteophyte formation at the posterior condylar notch. ME was evaluated both by meniscus subluxation index (MSI) indicating the ratio of the extruded width of the medial meniscus to the width of medial meniscal body and by the medial radial displacement (MRD) indicating actual extruded width. The size of the osteophyte was assessed using a semi-quantitative whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS). The predictive accuracy of KOA was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and optimal cutoff was determined for each parameter. Results: The AUC for MSI was 0.654 (0.561–0.748: 95% CI) and the cutoff value was determined as 17%. That for MRD was 0.677 (0.584–0.770) and the cutoff value was 2.2 mm. The AUC for the WORMS score at the posterior condylar notch was 0.667 (0.579–0.756) and the cutoff value was 2. Conclusions: Similar predicting capacity of KOA development was found both in ME and osteophyte formation at the posterior condylar notch. Using these simple parameter, mas-screening for KOA development would be possible.
AB - Background: Medial meniscal extrusion (ME) is a biomarker to predict later development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). On the other hand, we have reported osteophyte formation at the posterior condylar notch of the femur served as a biomarker for the same purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare capacity of the two biomarkers in predicting KOA development. Methods: Two cohort of knees were established utilizing publicly available data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). No OA group (NOA) consisted of knees that were grade 0 or 1 on Kellgren and Lawrence grade (K/L) both at baseline and 48 months later, and pre-radiographic-OA group (PROA) consisted of knees that were grade 0 or 1 at baseline but grade ≥2 48 months later. Baseline MR images were evaluated in terms of ME and osteophyte formation at the posterior condylar notch. ME was evaluated both by meniscus subluxation index (MSI) indicating the ratio of the extruded width of the medial meniscus to the width of medial meniscal body and by the medial radial displacement (MRD) indicating actual extruded width. The size of the osteophyte was assessed using a semi-quantitative whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS). The predictive accuracy of KOA was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and optimal cutoff was determined for each parameter. Results: The AUC for MSI was 0.654 (0.561–0.748: 95% CI) and the cutoff value was determined as 17%. That for MRD was 0.677 (0.584–0.770) and the cutoff value was 2.2 mm. The AUC for the WORMS score at the posterior condylar notch was 0.667 (0.579–0.756) and the cutoff value was 2. Conclusions: Similar predicting capacity of KOA development was found both in ME and osteophyte formation at the posterior condylar notch. Using these simple parameter, mas-screening for KOA development would be possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052331999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052331999&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 30166083
AN - SCOPUS:85052331999
SN - 0949-2658
VL - 24
SP - 121
EP - 127
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
IS - 1
ER -