Comparison of renal response to four different induction therapies in Japanese patients with lupus nephritis class III or IV: A single-centre retrospective study

Hironari Hanaoka, Tomofumi Kiyokawa, Harunobu Iida, Kana Ishimori, Yukiko Takakuwa, Takahiro Okazaki, Hidehiro Yamada, Daisuke Ichikawa, Sayuri Shirai, Junki Koike, Shoichi Ozaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis suggest that racial background should be considered while choosing induction therapy. However, the responses to different induction regimens have been poorly studied in Japanese population. Here, we assessed the renal response to different induction therapies in Japanese patients with lupus nephritis class III or IV. The records of 64 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis class III or IV were retrospectively evaluated according to therapy received: monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), the Euro-lupus nephritis trial (ELNT) protocol-IVCY, tacrolimus (TAC), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). We investigated cumulative complete renal response (CR) rates and relapse rates for each group for 3 years. Organ damage was assessed with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). There were 22 patients on monthly IVCY, 18 on ELNT-IVCY, 13 on TAC, and 11 on MMF. Lower systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) and higher CH50 were found in the TAC group at baseline (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences of cumulative CR rates and relapse free survival for 3 years among the four different therapeutic regimens (p = 0.2 and p = 0.2, respectively). There was a tendency to have early response and early relapse in TAC group and late response in MMF group. The SDI increase over 3 years was found more frequently in the TAC group than in the monthly-IVCY group (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis indicated that CR at 3 months was independent prognosticator for low damage accrual. Regarding lower damage accrual, early CR achievement might be essential in induction therapy regardless of immunosuppressant choice.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0175152
JournalPloS one
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 1
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Hanaoka, H., Kiyokawa, T., Iida, H., Ishimori, K., Takakuwa, Y., Okazaki, T., Yamada, H., Ichikawa, D., Shirai, S., Koike, J., & Ozaki, S. (2017). Comparison of renal response to four different induction therapies in Japanese patients with lupus nephritis class III or IV: A single-centre retrospective study. PloS one, 12(4), [e0175152]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175152