Comparison of shoulder internal rotation test with the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome

Kensuke Ochi, Yukio Horiuchi, Aya Tanabe, Kozo Morita, Kentaro Takeda, Ken Ninomiya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the shoulder internal rotation testa new, provocative testwith the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with CubTS were examined before and after surgery with 10 seconds each of the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests. Fifty-four asymptomatic individuals and 14 neuropathy patients with a diagnosis other than CubTS were also examined as control cases. For the shoulder internal rotation test, the patient's upper extremity was kept at 90° abduction, maximum internal rotation, and 10° flexion at the shoulder, with 90° elbow flexion and neutral position of the forearm and wrist, with finger extension. Test results were considered positive if any slight symptom attributable to CubTS occurred within 10 seconds. Extraneural pressure inside the cubital tunnel was intraoperatively measured with the positions of both the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests, in 15 of the CubTS cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test with a confidence level of 95%. Results: The preoperative sensitivity in CubTS cases was 80% in the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test and 36% in the 10-second elbow flexion test, and these differences were significant. None of the control cases had positive results in either test. All the CubTS cases improved with surgery; after surgery, neither test provoked symptoms in any surgical patient. The extraneural pressure increased in both provocative positions with no significant difference. Conclusions: Positive results for the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test were more sensitive than that for the elbow flexion test of the same duration and seemed specific to CubTS. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)782-787
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 May
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Elbow
Pressure
Wrist
Forearm
Upper Extremity
Fingers
Students

Keywords

  • Cubital tunnel syndrome
  • provocative test
  • shoulder internal rotation
  • ulnar nerve palsy
  • ulnar neuropathy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of shoulder internal rotation test with the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome. / Ochi, Kensuke; Horiuchi, Yukio; Tanabe, Aya; Morita, Kozo; Takeda, Kentaro; Ninomiya, Ken.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 782-787.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ochi, Kensuke ; Horiuchi, Yukio ; Tanabe, Aya ; Morita, Kozo ; Takeda, Kentaro ; Ninomiya, Ken. / Comparison of shoulder internal rotation test with the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome. In: Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 782-787.
@article{b85c1795aafc49febfbe2fb79e987be3,
title = "Comparison of shoulder internal rotation test with the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the shoulder internal rotation testa new, provocative testwith the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with CubTS were examined before and after surgery with 10 seconds each of the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests. Fifty-four asymptomatic individuals and 14 neuropathy patients with a diagnosis other than CubTS were also examined as control cases. For the shoulder internal rotation test, the patient's upper extremity was kept at 90° abduction, maximum internal rotation, and 10° flexion at the shoulder, with 90° elbow flexion and neutral position of the forearm and wrist, with finger extension. Test results were considered positive if any slight symptom attributable to CubTS occurred within 10 seconds. Extraneural pressure inside the cubital tunnel was intraoperatively measured with the positions of both the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests, in 15 of the CubTS cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test with a confidence level of 95{\%}. Results: The preoperative sensitivity in CubTS cases was 80{\%} in the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test and 36{\%} in the 10-second elbow flexion test, and these differences were significant. None of the control cases had positive results in either test. All the CubTS cases improved with surgery; after surgery, neither test provoked symptoms in any surgical patient. The extraneural pressure increased in both provocative positions with no significant difference. Conclusions: Positive results for the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test were more sensitive than that for the elbow flexion test of the same duration and seemed specific to CubTS. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.",
keywords = "Cubital tunnel syndrome, provocative test, shoulder internal rotation, ulnar nerve palsy, ulnar neuropathy",
author = "Kensuke Ochi and Yukio Horiuchi and Aya Tanabe and Kozo Morita and Kentaro Takeda and Ken Ninomiya",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.12.019",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "782--787",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0363-5023",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of shoulder internal rotation test with the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome

AU - Ochi, Kensuke

AU - Horiuchi, Yukio

AU - Tanabe, Aya

AU - Morita, Kozo

AU - Takeda, Kentaro

AU - Ninomiya, Ken

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Purpose: To compare the shoulder internal rotation testa new, provocative testwith the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with CubTS were examined before and after surgery with 10 seconds each of the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests. Fifty-four asymptomatic individuals and 14 neuropathy patients with a diagnosis other than CubTS were also examined as control cases. For the shoulder internal rotation test, the patient's upper extremity was kept at 90° abduction, maximum internal rotation, and 10° flexion at the shoulder, with 90° elbow flexion and neutral position of the forearm and wrist, with finger extension. Test results were considered positive if any slight symptom attributable to CubTS occurred within 10 seconds. Extraneural pressure inside the cubital tunnel was intraoperatively measured with the positions of both the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests, in 15 of the CubTS cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test with a confidence level of 95%. Results: The preoperative sensitivity in CubTS cases was 80% in the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test and 36% in the 10-second elbow flexion test, and these differences were significant. None of the control cases had positive results in either test. All the CubTS cases improved with surgery; after surgery, neither test provoked symptoms in any surgical patient. The extraneural pressure increased in both provocative positions with no significant difference. Conclusions: Positive results for the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test were more sensitive than that for the elbow flexion test of the same duration and seemed specific to CubTS. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

AB - Purpose: To compare the shoulder internal rotation testa new, provocative testwith the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS). Methods: Twenty-five patients with CubTS were examined before and after surgery with 10 seconds each of the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests. Fifty-four asymptomatic individuals and 14 neuropathy patients with a diagnosis other than CubTS were also examined as control cases. For the shoulder internal rotation test, the patient's upper extremity was kept at 90° abduction, maximum internal rotation, and 10° flexion at the shoulder, with 90° elbow flexion and neutral position of the forearm and wrist, with finger extension. Test results were considered positive if any slight symptom attributable to CubTS occurred within 10 seconds. Extraneural pressure inside the cubital tunnel was intraoperatively measured with the positions of both the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests, in 15 of the CubTS cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test with a confidence level of 95%. Results: The preoperative sensitivity in CubTS cases was 80% in the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test and 36% in the 10-second elbow flexion test, and these differences were significant. None of the control cases had positive results in either test. All the CubTS cases improved with surgery; after surgery, neither test provoked symptoms in any surgical patient. The extraneural pressure increased in both provocative positions with no significant difference. Conclusions: Positive results for the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test were more sensitive than that for the elbow flexion test of the same duration and seemed specific to CubTS. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

KW - Cubital tunnel syndrome

KW - provocative test

KW - shoulder internal rotation

KW - ulnar nerve palsy

KW - ulnar neuropathy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955522846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955522846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.12.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.12.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 21349657

AN - SCOPUS:79955522846

VL - 36

SP - 782

EP - 787

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0363-5023

IS - 5

ER -