Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: An animal study

N. Yahagi, H. Neuhaus, B. Schumacher, A. Neugebauer, G. F. Kaehler, M. Schenk, K. Fischer, M. Fujishiro, M. D. Enderle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of large gastrointestinal tumors. However, this technique has disadvantages such as a long intervention time, complexity of the procedure, and a higher rate of complications. The primary aims of the study were to show the feasibility of ESD in the pig colon and to evaluate a new ESD technique comprising the use of a newly developed hybrid knife for colon procedures combining RF (radiofrequency) application and a distance-dependent water-jet application. Materials and methods: ESD was conducted at three different locations in the colon according to the computer-generated randomization list, using either the standard technique (injection needle, flex knife, and hook knife as therapeutic instruments and DRY CUT and SWIFT COAG as RF currents), or the new ESD technique (hybrid knife as the therapeutic instrument combined with the new cutting mode ENDO CUT D) in 12 healthy pigs. The perforation and bleeding rates were documented and statistically analyzed. Intervention time, resected specimen size, thermal and mechanical damage of the resection bed, and number of instrument changes required were also recorded. Results: A total of 16 and 18 ESD procedures were performed by the standard and new techniques, respectively. Complete en bloc resection was achieved in all cases. The standard ESD technique showed a perforation rate of 25% (4/16) whereas the new ESD technique resulted in a 5.5% perforation rate (1/18) (P = 0.035); bleeding rates were similar. The new ESD technique was significantly safer compared with the standard ESD technique. Conclusions: A new ESD technique for the successful en bloc resection in thin-walled regions such as pig colon has been described. This procedure is as effective as the standard procedure but is easier to handle and significantly safer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-345
Number of pages6
JournalEndoscopy
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: An animal study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Yahagi, N., Neuhaus, H., Schumacher, B., Neugebauer, A., Kaehler, G. F., Schenk, M., Fischer, K., Fujishiro, M., & Enderle, M. D. (2009). Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: An animal study. Endoscopy, 41(4), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214473