TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of surgical treatments for triple extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid hands
T2 - A retrospective study of 48 cases
AU - Suzuki, Taku
AU - Iwamoto, Takuji
AU - Ikegami, Hiroyasu
AU - Sakuma, Yu
AU - Ikari, Katsunori
AU - Matsumura, Noboru
AU - Ochi, Kensuke
AU - Sato, Kazuki
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Momohara, Shigeki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Japan College of Rheumatology.
PY - 2016/3/3
Y1 - 2016/3/3
N2 - Objective. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of four different surgical reconstructions for extensor tendon ruptures in ulnar three fingers in 48 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods. The following four techniques were performed; palmaris longus tendon grafting (PL group; n = 9), extensor indicis proprius (EIP) tendon transfers (EIP group; n = 8), end-to-side transfers with tension-reduced early mobilization (End-to-side group; n = 16), and a combination of end-to-side and EIP transfers (Combination group; n = 15). Loss of extension was evaluated to determine the mean postoperative range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint and clinical outcomes were categorized using modified Geldmacher criteria. Results. Combination group demonstrated the best mean MP joint extension (- 3°), followed by End-to-side group (- 12°), EIP group (- 16°), and PL group (- 21°). Combination group yielded the best clinical outcomes with all cases showing good results. Conclusions. The combination of end-to-side and EIP transfer was an effective surgical reconstruction procedure for triple fingers extension loss.
AB - Objective. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of four different surgical reconstructions for extensor tendon ruptures in ulnar three fingers in 48 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods. The following four techniques were performed; palmaris longus tendon grafting (PL group; n = 9), extensor indicis proprius (EIP) tendon transfers (EIP group; n = 8), end-to-side transfers with tension-reduced early mobilization (End-to-side group; n = 16), and a combination of end-to-side and EIP transfers (Combination group; n = 15). Loss of extension was evaluated to determine the mean postoperative range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint and clinical outcomes were categorized using modified Geldmacher criteria. Results. Combination group demonstrated the best mean MP joint extension (- 3°), followed by End-to-side group (- 12°), EIP group (- 16°), and PL group (- 21°). Combination group yielded the best clinical outcomes with all cases showing good results. Conclusions. The combination of end-to-side and EIP transfer was an effective surgical reconstruction procedure for triple fingers extension loss.
KW - Rheumatoid arthritis
KW - Tendon reconstruction
KW - Tension-reduced early mobilization
KW - Triple fi ngers extension loss
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959507474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959507474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/14397595.2015.1070446
DO - 10.3109/14397595.2015.1070446
M3 - Article
C2 - 26143650
AN - SCOPUS:84959507474
SN - 1439-7595
VL - 26
SP - 206
EP - 210
JO - Japanese Journal of Rheumatology
JF - Japanese Journal of Rheumatology
IS - 2
ER -