Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke

The Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS)

Masaru Seki, Kimitaka Hase, Hidetoshi Takahashi, Meigen Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to compare the performance of three representative instruments to measure changes of motor recovery with acute hemispheric stroke. Method: In 41 consecutive patients with acute hemispheric infarction, motor recovery was assessed within 3 days of onset and then every 2 weeks until the 12th week with the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). We analyzed the relationships among the corresponding subscales of the three instruments with the Spearman's rank correlation method, and compared their responsiveness by plotting the temporal profiles of scores of each instrument and by testing the significance of changes over time with the Friedman test. Results: High correlations were observed among the three instruments at each examination point. However, the SIAS scores were more widely dispersed at the same NIHSS and CNS scores. Friedman test revealed that the scores changed significantly during the observation period with the SIAS and the CNS but not with the NIHSS. The changes were detected later with the CNS than with the SIAS. Conclusions: Although the assessment results with the three instruments were highly inter-correlated, the SIAS performed better with respect to responsiveness to changes.Implication for RehabilitationWhen providing rehabilitation services to patients with stroke, it is important to document objectively the level of their impairment from the acute stage and during the entire course of rehabilitation with standardized instrument, and to predict their functional outcomes as early and accurately as possible.This study therefore compared three representative instruments with established psychometric properties, the SIAS, the NIHSS and the CNS, with respect to their ability to document motor impairment and their responsiveness to recovery in patients with acute hemispheric stroke.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1549-1554
Number of pages6
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume36
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Aug 1

Fingerprint

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Stroke
Rehabilitation
Aptitude
Psychometrics
Infarction
Observation

Keywords

  • Hemiplegia
  • Measurement
  • Motor recovery
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{6e9bc62212b842c0b6671306ee839ea4,
title = "Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke: The Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS)",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose was to compare the performance of three representative instruments to measure changes of motor recovery with acute hemispheric stroke. Method: In 41 consecutive patients with acute hemispheric infarction, motor recovery was assessed within 3 days of onset and then every 2 weeks until the 12th week with the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). We analyzed the relationships among the corresponding subscales of the three instruments with the Spearman's rank correlation method, and compared their responsiveness by plotting the temporal profiles of scores of each instrument and by testing the significance of changes over time with the Friedman test. Results: High correlations were observed among the three instruments at each examination point. However, the SIAS scores were more widely dispersed at the same NIHSS and CNS scores. Friedman test revealed that the scores changed significantly during the observation period with the SIAS and the CNS but not with the NIHSS. The changes were detected later with the CNS than with the SIAS. Conclusions: Although the assessment results with the three instruments were highly inter-correlated, the SIAS performed better with respect to responsiveness to changes.Implication for RehabilitationWhen providing rehabilitation services to patients with stroke, it is important to document objectively the level of their impairment from the acute stage and during the entire course of rehabilitation with standardized instrument, and to predict their functional outcomes as early and accurately as possible.This study therefore compared three representative instruments with established psychometric properties, the SIAS, the NIHSS and the CNS, with respect to their ability to document motor impairment and their responsiveness to recovery in patients with acute hemispheric stroke.",
keywords = "Hemiplegia, Measurement, Motor recovery, Stroke",
author = "Masaru Seki and Kimitaka Hase and Hidetoshi Takahashi and Meigen Liu",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/09638288.2013.854840",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1549--1554",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke

T2 - The Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS)

AU - Seki, Masaru

AU - Hase, Kimitaka

AU - Takahashi, Hidetoshi

AU - Liu, Meigen

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose was to compare the performance of three representative instruments to measure changes of motor recovery with acute hemispheric stroke. Method: In 41 consecutive patients with acute hemispheric infarction, motor recovery was assessed within 3 days of onset and then every 2 weeks until the 12th week with the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). We analyzed the relationships among the corresponding subscales of the three instruments with the Spearman's rank correlation method, and compared their responsiveness by plotting the temporal profiles of scores of each instrument and by testing the significance of changes over time with the Friedman test. Results: High correlations were observed among the three instruments at each examination point. However, the SIAS scores were more widely dispersed at the same NIHSS and CNS scores. Friedman test revealed that the scores changed significantly during the observation period with the SIAS and the CNS but not with the NIHSS. The changes were detected later with the CNS than with the SIAS. Conclusions: Although the assessment results with the three instruments were highly inter-correlated, the SIAS performed better with respect to responsiveness to changes.Implication for RehabilitationWhen providing rehabilitation services to patients with stroke, it is important to document objectively the level of their impairment from the acute stage and during the entire course of rehabilitation with standardized instrument, and to predict their functional outcomes as early and accurately as possible.This study therefore compared three representative instruments with established psychometric properties, the SIAS, the NIHSS and the CNS, with respect to their ability to document motor impairment and their responsiveness to recovery in patients with acute hemispheric stroke.

AB - Purpose: The purpose was to compare the performance of three representative instruments to measure changes of motor recovery with acute hemispheric stroke. Method: In 41 consecutive patients with acute hemispheric infarction, motor recovery was assessed within 3 days of onset and then every 2 weeks until the 12th week with the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). We analyzed the relationships among the corresponding subscales of the three instruments with the Spearman's rank correlation method, and compared their responsiveness by plotting the temporal profiles of scores of each instrument and by testing the significance of changes over time with the Friedman test. Results: High correlations were observed among the three instruments at each examination point. However, the SIAS scores were more widely dispersed at the same NIHSS and CNS scores. Friedman test revealed that the scores changed significantly during the observation period with the SIAS and the CNS but not with the NIHSS. The changes were detected later with the CNS than with the SIAS. Conclusions: Although the assessment results with the three instruments were highly inter-correlated, the SIAS performed better with respect to responsiveness to changes.Implication for RehabilitationWhen providing rehabilitation services to patients with stroke, it is important to document objectively the level of their impairment from the acute stage and during the entire course of rehabilitation with standardized instrument, and to predict their functional outcomes as early and accurately as possible.This study therefore compared three representative instruments with established psychometric properties, the SIAS, the NIHSS and the CNS, with respect to their ability to document motor impairment and their responsiveness to recovery in patients with acute hemispheric stroke.

KW - Hemiplegia

KW - Measurement

KW - Motor recovery

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907046553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907046553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2013.854840

DO - 10.3109/09638288.2013.854840

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1549

EP - 1554

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 18

ER -