Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia: A review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce

Joshua Tsoh, Carmelle Peisah, Jin Narumoto, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nick O'Neill, Tao Jiang, Shoichi Ogano, Masaru Mimura, Yuka Kato, Helen Chiu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce was established to promote the autonomy, proper access to care, and dignity of persons with decision-making disabilities (DMDs) across nations. The Asia Consortium of the taskforce was established to pursue these goals in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper is part of the Asia Consortium's initiative to promote understanding and advocacy in regard to surrogate decision-making across the region. Method: The current guardianship laws are compared, and jurisdictional variations in the processes for proxy decision-making to support persons with DMDs and other health and social needs in China, Japan, Thailand, and Australia are explored. Results: The different Asia-Pacific countries have various proxy decision-making mechanisms in place for persons with DMDs, which are both formalized according to common law, civil law, and other legislation, and shaped by cultural practices. Various processes for guardianship and mechanisms for medical decision-making and asset management exist across the region. Processes that are still evolving across the region include those that facilitate advanced planning as a result of the paucity of legal structures for enduring powers of attorney (EPA) and guardianship in some regions, and the struggle to achieve consensual positions in regard to end-of-life decision-making. Formal processes for supporting decision-making are yet to be developed. Conclusions: The diverse legal approaches to guardianship and administration must be understood to meet the challenges of the rapidly ageing population in the Asia-Pacific region. Commonalities in the solutions and difficulties faced in encountering these challenges have global significance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1029-1037
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 4

Fingerprint

Thailand
China
Decision Making
Japan
Proxy
Lawyers
Legislation
Health
Population

Keywords

  • aged
  • Asia
  • Australia
  • China
  • dementia
  • Hong Kong
  • Japan
  • Thailand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Gerontology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia : A review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce. / Tsoh, Joshua; Peisah, Carmelle; Narumoto, Jin; Wongpakaran, Nahathai; Wongpakaran, Tinakon; O'Neill, Nick; Jiang, Tao; Ogano, Shoichi; Mimura, Masaru; Kato, Yuka; Chiu, Helen.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 27, No. 6, 04.06.2015, p. 1029-1037.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsoh, Joshua ; Peisah, Carmelle ; Narumoto, Jin ; Wongpakaran, Nahathai ; Wongpakaran, Tinakon ; O'Neill, Nick ; Jiang, Tao ; Ogano, Shoichi ; Mimura, Masaru ; Kato, Yuka ; Chiu, Helen. / Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia : A review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce. In: International Psychogeriatrics. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 1029-1037.
@article{a4116a2992794527bfa202ff63e492c7,
title = "Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia: A review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce",
abstract = "Background: The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce was established to promote the autonomy, proper access to care, and dignity of persons with decision-making disabilities (DMDs) across nations. The Asia Consortium of the taskforce was established to pursue these goals in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper is part of the Asia Consortium's initiative to promote understanding and advocacy in regard to surrogate decision-making across the region. Method: The current guardianship laws are compared, and jurisdictional variations in the processes for proxy decision-making to support persons with DMDs and other health and social needs in China, Japan, Thailand, and Australia are explored. Results: The different Asia-Pacific countries have various proxy decision-making mechanisms in place for persons with DMDs, which are both formalized according to common law, civil law, and other legislation, and shaped by cultural practices. Various processes for guardianship and mechanisms for medical decision-making and asset management exist across the region. Processes that are still evolving across the region include those that facilitate advanced planning as a result of the paucity of legal structures for enduring powers of attorney (EPA) and guardianship in some regions, and the struggle to achieve consensual positions in regard to end-of-life decision-making. Formal processes for supporting decision-making are yet to be developed. Conclusions: The diverse legal approaches to guardianship and administration must be understood to meet the challenges of the rapidly ageing population in the Asia-Pacific region. Commonalities in the solutions and difficulties faced in encountering these challenges have global significance.",
keywords = "aged, Asia, Australia, China, dementia, Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand",
author = "Joshua Tsoh and Carmelle Peisah and Jin Narumoto and Nahathai Wongpakaran and Tinakon Wongpakaran and Nick O'Neill and Tao Jiang and Shoichi Ogano and Masaru Mimura and Yuka Kato and Helen Chiu",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S104161021400266X",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1029--1037",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia

T2 - A review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce

AU - Tsoh, Joshua

AU - Peisah, Carmelle

AU - Narumoto, Jin

AU - Wongpakaran, Nahathai

AU - Wongpakaran, Tinakon

AU - O'Neill, Nick

AU - Jiang, Tao

AU - Ogano, Shoichi

AU - Mimura, Masaru

AU - Kato, Yuka

AU - Chiu, Helen

PY - 2015/6/4

Y1 - 2015/6/4

N2 - Background: The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce was established to promote the autonomy, proper access to care, and dignity of persons with decision-making disabilities (DMDs) across nations. The Asia Consortium of the taskforce was established to pursue these goals in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper is part of the Asia Consortium's initiative to promote understanding and advocacy in regard to surrogate decision-making across the region. Method: The current guardianship laws are compared, and jurisdictional variations in the processes for proxy decision-making to support persons with DMDs and other health and social needs in China, Japan, Thailand, and Australia are explored. Results: The different Asia-Pacific countries have various proxy decision-making mechanisms in place for persons with DMDs, which are both formalized according to common law, civil law, and other legislation, and shaped by cultural practices. Various processes for guardianship and mechanisms for medical decision-making and asset management exist across the region. Processes that are still evolving across the region include those that facilitate advanced planning as a result of the paucity of legal structures for enduring powers of attorney (EPA) and guardianship in some regions, and the struggle to achieve consensual positions in regard to end-of-life decision-making. Formal processes for supporting decision-making are yet to be developed. Conclusions: The diverse legal approaches to guardianship and administration must be understood to meet the challenges of the rapidly ageing population in the Asia-Pacific region. Commonalities in the solutions and difficulties faced in encountering these challenges have global significance.

AB - Background: The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce was established to promote the autonomy, proper access to care, and dignity of persons with decision-making disabilities (DMDs) across nations. The Asia Consortium of the taskforce was established to pursue these goals in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper is part of the Asia Consortium's initiative to promote understanding and advocacy in regard to surrogate decision-making across the region. Method: The current guardianship laws are compared, and jurisdictional variations in the processes for proxy decision-making to support persons with DMDs and other health and social needs in China, Japan, Thailand, and Australia are explored. Results: The different Asia-Pacific countries have various proxy decision-making mechanisms in place for persons with DMDs, which are both formalized according to common law, civil law, and other legislation, and shaped by cultural practices. Various processes for guardianship and mechanisms for medical decision-making and asset management exist across the region. Processes that are still evolving across the region include those that facilitate advanced planning as a result of the paucity of legal structures for enduring powers of attorney (EPA) and guardianship in some regions, and the struggle to achieve consensual positions in regard to end-of-life decision-making. Formal processes for supporting decision-making are yet to be developed. Conclusions: The diverse legal approaches to guardianship and administration must be understood to meet the challenges of the rapidly ageing population in the Asia-Pacific region. Commonalities in the solutions and difficulties faced in encountering these challenges have global significance.

KW - aged

KW - Asia

KW - Australia

KW - China

KW - dementia

KW - Hong Kong

KW - Japan

KW - Thailand

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929519598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929519598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S104161021400266X

DO - 10.1017/S104161021400266X

M3 - Article

C2 - 25573420

AN - SCOPUS:84929519598

VL - 27

SP - 1029

EP - 1037

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

IS - 6

ER -