Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version

Noboru Matsumura, Kiyohisa Ogawa, Hiroyasu Ikegami, Philippe Collin, Gilles Walch, Yoshiaki Toyama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The conventional measuring method for glenoid version is greatly influenced by the scapular body shape that varies widely between patients. We postulated that the glenoid vault version could be more useful than the conventional glenoid version in clinical cases.Objectives: The purposes of this study were to compare the values of glenoid version measured with the conventional method to those with the vault method and to investigate the feasibility of the glenoid vault version.Methods: Computed tomography scans of 150 normal shoulders and 150 arthritic shoulders were analyzed. Three-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, and glenoid version was measured with both the conventional and vault methods. After determining intra- and interrater reliabilities, differences in glenoid version values between the conventional and vault methods were assessed. In the normal shoulder group, side-to-side differences of glenoid version values were also evaluated in both methods.Results: Both measuring methods demonstrated high intra- and interrater reliabilities. The normal glenoid had 1.1° ± 3.2° retroversion with the conventional method and 8.9° ± 2.7° retroversion with the vault method. The average glenoid retroversion of arthritic shoulders was 10.8° ± 9.3° measured with the conventional method and 18.2° ± 9.1° with the vault method. The vault method showed significantly larger glenoid retroversion than the conventional method in both normal and arthritic shoulder groups. Both conventional glenoid retroversion and glenoid vault retroversion were significantly larger on dominant sides than on nondominant sides in the normal shoulders.Conclusions: The glenoid vault version could be used as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version with high reliability. In clinical use, the glenoid vault version appears to be more useful than the conventional glenoid version to assess the severity of arthritis and difficulty of glenoid replacement. The glenoid vault is not symmetric, but usually retroverted in both normal and arthritic shoulders.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar 11

Keywords

  • Glenoid component
  • Glenoid morphology
  • Glenoid replacement
  • Glenoid retroversion
  • Glenoid vault
  • Glenoid version
  • Shoulder arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this