Concurrent VR VI schedules: Primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates

Takayuki Tanno, Alan Silberberg, Takayuki Sakagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the first condition in Experiment 1,6 rats were exposed to concurrent variable ratio (VR) 30, variable interval (VI) 30-sec schedules. In the next two conditions, the subjects were exposed to concurrent VIVI schedules and concurrent tandem VI-differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate VI schedules. For the latter conditions, the overall and relative reinforcer rates equaled those in the first condition. Only minor differences appeared in time allocation (a molar measure) across conditions. However, local response rate differences (a molecular measure) appeared between schedule types consistently with the interresponse times these schedules reinforced. In Experiment 2, these findings reappeared when the prior experiment was replicated with 5 subjects, except that the VR schedule was replaced by a VI plus linear feedback schedule. These results suggest that within the context tested, the molar factor of relative reinforcement rate controls preference, whereas the molecular factor of the relation between interresponse times and reinforcer probability controls the local response rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-393
Number of pages12
JournalLearning and Behavior
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Nov
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appointments and Schedules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Concurrent VR VI schedules : Primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates. / Tanno, Takayuki; Silberberg, Alan; Sakagami, Takayuki.

In: Learning and Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 4, 11.2010, p. 382-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tanno, Takayuki ; Silberberg, Alan ; Sakagami, Takayuki. / Concurrent VR VI schedules : Primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates. In: Learning and Behavior. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 382-393.
@article{959ddd4b7e0c4f7b993defc53a00c07e,
title = "Concurrent VR VI schedules: Primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates",
abstract = "In the first condition in Experiment 1,6 rats were exposed to concurrent variable ratio (VR) 30, variable interval (VI) 30-sec schedules. In the next two conditions, the subjects were exposed to concurrent VIVI schedules and concurrent tandem VI-differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate VI schedules. For the latter conditions, the overall and relative reinforcer rates equaled those in the first condition. Only minor differences appeared in time allocation (a molar measure) across conditions. However, local response rate differences (a molecular measure) appeared between schedule types consistently with the interresponse times these schedules reinforced. In Experiment 2, these findings reappeared when the prior experiment was replicated with 5 subjects, except that the VR schedule was replaced by a VI plus linear feedback schedule. These results suggest that within the context tested, the molar factor of relative reinforcement rate controls preference, whereas the molecular factor of the relation between interresponse times and reinforcer probability controls the local response rate.",
author = "Takayuki Tanno and Alan Silberberg and Takayuki Sakagami",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3758/LB.38.4.382",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "382--393",
journal = "Learning and Behavior",
issn = "1543-4494",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concurrent VR VI schedules

T2 - Primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates

AU - Tanno, Takayuki

AU - Silberberg, Alan

AU - Sakagami, Takayuki

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - In the first condition in Experiment 1,6 rats were exposed to concurrent variable ratio (VR) 30, variable interval (VI) 30-sec schedules. In the next two conditions, the subjects were exposed to concurrent VIVI schedules and concurrent tandem VI-differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate VI schedules. For the latter conditions, the overall and relative reinforcer rates equaled those in the first condition. Only minor differences appeared in time allocation (a molar measure) across conditions. However, local response rate differences (a molecular measure) appeared between schedule types consistently with the interresponse times these schedules reinforced. In Experiment 2, these findings reappeared when the prior experiment was replicated with 5 subjects, except that the VR schedule was replaced by a VI plus linear feedback schedule. These results suggest that within the context tested, the molar factor of relative reinforcement rate controls preference, whereas the molecular factor of the relation between interresponse times and reinforcer probability controls the local response rate.

AB - In the first condition in Experiment 1,6 rats were exposed to concurrent variable ratio (VR) 30, variable interval (VI) 30-sec schedules. In the next two conditions, the subjects were exposed to concurrent VIVI schedules and concurrent tandem VI-differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate VI schedules. For the latter conditions, the overall and relative reinforcer rates equaled those in the first condition. Only minor differences appeared in time allocation (a molar measure) across conditions. However, local response rate differences (a molecular measure) appeared between schedule types consistently with the interresponse times these schedules reinforced. In Experiment 2, these findings reappeared when the prior experiment was replicated with 5 subjects, except that the VR schedule was replaced by a VI plus linear feedback schedule. These results suggest that within the context tested, the molar factor of relative reinforcement rate controls preference, whereas the molecular factor of the relation between interresponse times and reinforcer probability controls the local response rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751505661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751505661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/LB.38.4.382

DO - 10.3758/LB.38.4.382

M3 - Article

C2 - 21048229

AN - SCOPUS:79751505661

VL - 38

SP - 382

EP - 393

JO - Learning and Behavior

JF - Learning and Behavior

SN - 1543-4494

IS - 4

ER -