Configural and component processings in face recognition: Comparison between inversion and negation effects

Takeo Tsujii, Yuji Itoh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has previously been reported that subjects show difficulties in recognizing faces which are either inverted or in photographic negative. This study examined whether inversion and negation would disrupt the same aspects of face recognition processes in a same-different decision task for simultaneously presented faces. In a "different" condition, two faces were subtlely changed either in component information (eye size) or configural information (placement of inner features). The results revealed that negation equally disrupted component and configural processings, whereas inversion selectively disrupted configural processing more than component processing. Thus, the negation effect, which has been accounted for in terms of edge vs. surface processing, cannot be accounted for in terms of component vs. configural processing. It is concluded that inversion and negation selectively disrupt different aspects of cognitive processes underlying face recognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-330
Number of pages6
JournalShinrigaku Kenkyu
Volume71
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Oct

Fingerprint

Facial Recognition

Keywords

  • Component
  • Configuration
  • Face
  • Inversion effect
  • Negation effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Configural and component processings in face recognition : Comparison between inversion and negation effects. / Tsujii, Takeo; Itoh, Yuji.

In: Shinrigaku Kenkyu, Vol. 71, No. 4, 10.2000, p. 325-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad66386fef4a4388973de3262322496b,
title = "Configural and component processings in face recognition: Comparison between inversion and negation effects",
abstract = "It has previously been reported that subjects show difficulties in recognizing faces which are either inverted or in photographic negative. This study examined whether inversion and negation would disrupt the same aspects of face recognition processes in a same-different decision task for simultaneously presented faces. In a {"}different{"} condition, two faces were subtlely changed either in component information (eye size) or configural information (placement of inner features). The results revealed that negation equally disrupted component and configural processings, whereas inversion selectively disrupted configural processing more than component processing. Thus, the negation effect, which has been accounted for in terms of edge vs. surface processing, cannot be accounted for in terms of component vs. configural processing. It is concluded that inversion and negation selectively disrupt different aspects of cognitive processes underlying face recognition.",
keywords = "Component, Configuration, Face, Inversion effect, Negation effect",
author = "Takeo Tsujii and Yuji Itoh",
year = "2000",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "325--330",
journal = "Shinrigaku Kenkyu",
issn = "0021-5236",
publisher = "Japanese Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Configural and component processings in face recognition

T2 - Comparison between inversion and negation effects

AU - Tsujii, Takeo

AU - Itoh, Yuji

PY - 2000/10

Y1 - 2000/10

N2 - It has previously been reported that subjects show difficulties in recognizing faces which are either inverted or in photographic negative. This study examined whether inversion and negation would disrupt the same aspects of face recognition processes in a same-different decision task for simultaneously presented faces. In a "different" condition, two faces were subtlely changed either in component information (eye size) or configural information (placement of inner features). The results revealed that negation equally disrupted component and configural processings, whereas inversion selectively disrupted configural processing more than component processing. Thus, the negation effect, which has been accounted for in terms of edge vs. surface processing, cannot be accounted for in terms of component vs. configural processing. It is concluded that inversion and negation selectively disrupt different aspects of cognitive processes underlying face recognition.

AB - It has previously been reported that subjects show difficulties in recognizing faces which are either inverted or in photographic negative. This study examined whether inversion and negation would disrupt the same aspects of face recognition processes in a same-different decision task for simultaneously presented faces. In a "different" condition, two faces were subtlely changed either in component information (eye size) or configural information (placement of inner features). The results revealed that negation equally disrupted component and configural processings, whereas inversion selectively disrupted configural processing more than component processing. Thus, the negation effect, which has been accounted for in terms of edge vs. surface processing, cannot be accounted for in terms of component vs. configural processing. It is concluded that inversion and negation selectively disrupt different aspects of cognitive processes underlying face recognition.

KW - Component

KW - Configuration

KW - Face

KW - Inversion effect

KW - Negation effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034302764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034302764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11140253

AN - SCOPUS:0034302764

VL - 71

SP - 325

EP - 330

JO - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

JF - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

SN - 0021-5236

IS - 4

ER -