Construing emotion in academic writing: L2 writers’ use of affect in historical explanation essays

Gordon Myskow, Masumi Ono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Writing about historical change involves advancing causal explanations that show how events impact people and how their emotions contribute to historical outcomes such as wars and revolutions. This study uses Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal framework to examine how the language of emotion (Affect), an overlooked feature of historical discourse, is used by L2 writers of an under-examined genre, the Factorial Explanation. The study was conducted in a content-based, political-history course for 63 upper-intermediate learners of English at a Japanese university. Results show that while writers made extensive use of the Affect categories Positive Inclination and Negative Satisfaction, which were often realized as adjectives and verbs, nominal formulations for building cohesion were infrequent. Writers also tended to intensify Affect resources by construing feelings as static attributes rather than destabilizing forces of change. The paper makes recommendations for teaching genre-specific language features to aid learners in construing the emotion of history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-219
Number of pages29
JournalWriting and Pedagogy
Volume10
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

emotion
writer
genre
political history
language
event
university
discourse
Teaching
history
resources
Writer
Academic Writing
Emotion
Historical Explanation
Language
Historical Change
Adjective
Causal Explanation
Verbs

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Appraisal framework
  • Evaluative language
  • Historical discourse
  • Second language writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Construing emotion in academic writing : L2 writers’ use of affect in historical explanation essays. / Myskow, Gordon; Ono, Masumi.

In: Writing and Pedagogy, Vol. 10, No. 1-2, 01.01.2018, p. 191-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{acc05eb97a554ce2a42aa0d83bfe9a8f,
title = "Construing emotion in academic writing: L2 writers’ use of affect in historical explanation essays",
abstract = "Writing about historical change involves advancing causal explanations that show how events impact people and how their emotions contribute to historical outcomes such as wars and revolutions. This study uses Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal framework to examine how the language of emotion (Affect), an overlooked feature of historical discourse, is used by L2 writers of an under-examined genre, the Factorial Explanation. The study was conducted in a content-based, political-history course for 63 upper-intermediate learners of English at a Japanese university. Results show that while writers made extensive use of the Affect categories Positive Inclination and Negative Satisfaction, which were often realized as adjectives and verbs, nominal formulations for building cohesion were infrequent. Writers also tended to intensify Affect resources by construing feelings as static attributes rather than destabilizing forces of change. The paper makes recommendations for teaching genre-specific language features to aid learners in construing the emotion of history.",
keywords = "Affect, Appraisal framework, Evaluative language, Historical discourse, Second language writing",
author = "Gordon Myskow and Masumi Ono",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1558/wap.32850",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "191--219",
journal = "Writing and Pedagogy",
issn = "1756-5839",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construing emotion in academic writing

T2 - L2 writers’ use of affect in historical explanation essays

AU - Myskow, Gordon

AU - Ono, Masumi

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Writing about historical change involves advancing causal explanations that show how events impact people and how their emotions contribute to historical outcomes such as wars and revolutions. This study uses Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal framework to examine how the language of emotion (Affect), an overlooked feature of historical discourse, is used by L2 writers of an under-examined genre, the Factorial Explanation. The study was conducted in a content-based, political-history course for 63 upper-intermediate learners of English at a Japanese university. Results show that while writers made extensive use of the Affect categories Positive Inclination and Negative Satisfaction, which were often realized as adjectives and verbs, nominal formulations for building cohesion were infrequent. Writers also tended to intensify Affect resources by construing feelings as static attributes rather than destabilizing forces of change. The paper makes recommendations for teaching genre-specific language features to aid learners in construing the emotion of history.

AB - Writing about historical change involves advancing causal explanations that show how events impact people and how their emotions contribute to historical outcomes such as wars and revolutions. This study uses Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal framework to examine how the language of emotion (Affect), an overlooked feature of historical discourse, is used by L2 writers of an under-examined genre, the Factorial Explanation. The study was conducted in a content-based, political-history course for 63 upper-intermediate learners of English at a Japanese university. Results show that while writers made extensive use of the Affect categories Positive Inclination and Negative Satisfaction, which were often realized as adjectives and verbs, nominal formulations for building cohesion were infrequent. Writers also tended to intensify Affect resources by construing feelings as static attributes rather than destabilizing forces of change. The paper makes recommendations for teaching genre-specific language features to aid learners in construing the emotion of history.

KW - Affect

KW - Appraisal framework

KW - Evaluative language

KW - Historical discourse

KW - Second language writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062785208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062785208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1558/wap.32850

DO - 10.1558/wap.32850

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062785208

VL - 10

SP - 191

EP - 219

JO - Writing and Pedagogy

JF - Writing and Pedagogy

SN - 1756-5839

IS - 1-2

ER -