Correlation between static limb alignment and peak knee adduction angle during gait is affected by subject pain in medial knee osteoarthritis

Kanako Kudo, Takeo Nagura, Kengo Harato, Shu Kobayashi, Yasuo Niki, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Although increases in knee adduction moment (KAM) and angle (KAA) during gait are considered key pathologies that produce mechanical overload in the medial compartment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is unclear how these pathologies are related to subjective pain. The purpose of this study was to examine how subjective pain is related to such pathologies. Methods: Gait analysis was performed in 31 participants with medial knee OA. The knees were classified into three groups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade: early (0 and 1), moderate (2), and severe (3 and 4). Subjective pain was evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index pain score. The knees were classified into low- and high-pain groups based on the pain score. Results: The WOMAC pain score did not correlate with either peak KAM or peak KAA. Although a positive correlation between static limb alignment and peak KAA was observed in the low-pain group, it was not observed in the high-pain group. Knee flexion angle at heel strike correlated negatively with the gap between static femorotibial angle and peak KAA in the high-pain group. Conclusions: Although a direct correlation between subjective pain and peak KAM or KAA was not observed, our results suggest a compensatory movement in the high-pain group of participants to reduce KAA increases in the early stance phase. Such movements would be one of the reasons why it is difficult to obtain a consistent relationship between subjective pain and load-related parameters.

Original languageEnglish
JournalKnee
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Knee Osteoarthritis
Gait
Knee
Extremities
Pain
Pathology
Heel
Ontario
Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Gait analysis
  • Knee adduction angle
  • Knee adduction moment
  • Knee osteoarthritis
  • Subjective pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{d3305c8d943246b5b243a772f9d5472c,
title = "Correlation between static limb alignment and peak knee adduction angle during gait is affected by subject pain in medial knee osteoarthritis",
abstract = "Background: Although increases in knee adduction moment (KAM) and angle (KAA) during gait are considered key pathologies that produce mechanical overload in the medial compartment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is unclear how these pathologies are related to subjective pain. The purpose of this study was to examine how subjective pain is related to such pathologies. Methods: Gait analysis was performed in 31 participants with medial knee OA. The knees were classified into three groups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade: early (0 and 1), moderate (2), and severe (3 and 4). Subjective pain was evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index pain score. The knees were classified into low- and high-pain groups based on the pain score. Results: The WOMAC pain score did not correlate with either peak KAM or peak KAA. Although a positive correlation between static limb alignment and peak KAA was observed in the low-pain group, it was not observed in the high-pain group. Knee flexion angle at heel strike correlated negatively with the gap between static femorotibial angle and peak KAA in the high-pain group. Conclusions: Although a direct correlation between subjective pain and peak KAM or KAA was not observed, our results suggest a compensatory movement in the high-pain group of participants to reduce KAA increases in the early stance phase. Such movements would be one of the reasons why it is difficult to obtain a consistent relationship between subjective pain and load-related parameters.",
keywords = "Gait analysis, Knee adduction angle, Knee adduction moment, Knee osteoarthritis, Subjective pain",
author = "Kanako Kudo and Takeo Nagura and Kengo Harato and Shu Kobayashi and Yasuo Niki and Morio Matsumoto and Masaya Nakamura",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.008",
language = "English",
journal = "Knee",
issn = "0968-0160",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlation between static limb alignment and peak knee adduction angle during gait is affected by subject pain in medial knee osteoarthritis

AU - Kudo, Kanako

AU - Nagura, Takeo

AU - Harato, Kengo

AU - Kobayashi, Shu

AU - Niki, Yasuo

AU - Matsumoto, Morio

AU - Nakamura, Masaya

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Although increases in knee adduction moment (KAM) and angle (KAA) during gait are considered key pathologies that produce mechanical overload in the medial compartment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is unclear how these pathologies are related to subjective pain. The purpose of this study was to examine how subjective pain is related to such pathologies. Methods: Gait analysis was performed in 31 participants with medial knee OA. The knees were classified into three groups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade: early (0 and 1), moderate (2), and severe (3 and 4). Subjective pain was evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index pain score. The knees were classified into low- and high-pain groups based on the pain score. Results: The WOMAC pain score did not correlate with either peak KAM or peak KAA. Although a positive correlation between static limb alignment and peak KAA was observed in the low-pain group, it was not observed in the high-pain group. Knee flexion angle at heel strike correlated negatively with the gap between static femorotibial angle and peak KAA in the high-pain group. Conclusions: Although a direct correlation between subjective pain and peak KAM or KAA was not observed, our results suggest a compensatory movement in the high-pain group of participants to reduce KAA increases in the early stance phase. Such movements would be one of the reasons why it is difficult to obtain a consistent relationship between subjective pain and load-related parameters.

AB - Background: Although increases in knee adduction moment (KAM) and angle (KAA) during gait are considered key pathologies that produce mechanical overload in the medial compartment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is unclear how these pathologies are related to subjective pain. The purpose of this study was to examine how subjective pain is related to such pathologies. Methods: Gait analysis was performed in 31 participants with medial knee OA. The knees were classified into three groups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade: early (0 and 1), moderate (2), and severe (3 and 4). Subjective pain was evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index pain score. The knees were classified into low- and high-pain groups based on the pain score. Results: The WOMAC pain score did not correlate with either peak KAM or peak KAA. Although a positive correlation between static limb alignment and peak KAA was observed in the low-pain group, it was not observed in the high-pain group. Knee flexion angle at heel strike correlated negatively with the gap between static femorotibial angle and peak KAA in the high-pain group. Conclusions: Although a direct correlation between subjective pain and peak KAM or KAA was not observed, our results suggest a compensatory movement in the high-pain group of participants to reduce KAA increases in the early stance phase. Such movements would be one of the reasons why it is difficult to obtain a consistent relationship between subjective pain and load-related parameters.

KW - Gait analysis

KW - Knee adduction angle

KW - Knee adduction moment

KW - Knee osteoarthritis

KW - Subjective pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076210145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076210145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.008

DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 31806512

AN - SCOPUS:85076210145

JO - Knee

JF - Knee

SN - 0968-0160

ER -