Cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach for subacute stroke patients: Result of a randomized controlled trial

Hirofumi Nagayama, Kounosuke Tomori, Kanta Ohno, Kayoko Takahashi, Ryutaro Nagatani, Ryota Izumi, Kensuke Moriwaki, Keita Yamauchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: The cost effectiveness of occupational therapy for subacute stroke patients is unclear in the extant literature. Consequently, this study determined the cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach using Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for subacute stroke patients compared with an impairment-based approach. Methods: We conducted an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside a pilot randomized controlled trial, with a single blind assessor for participants in 10 subacute rehabilitation units in Japan. The intervention group received occupation-based goal setting using ADOC, with interventions focused on meaningful occupations. The control group received an impairment-based approach focused on restoring capacities. For both groups, occupational-therapy intervention was administered more than five times per week, for over 40 min each time, and they received physical and speech therapy prior to discharge. The main outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total costs. Further, sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the influence of parameter uncertainty on the base case results. Results: The final number of participants was 24 in each of the two groups. In terms of QALYs, the intervention group is significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.001, difference 95% CI: 0.002-0.008) and total costs are not statistically significant. Applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of JPY 5 million/ QALY, the probability of the occupation-based approach using ADOC being cost effective was estimated to be 65.3%. Conclusions: The results show that the occupation-based approach is associated with significantly improved QALYs and has potential cost effectiveness, compared with the impairment-based approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-344
Number of pages8
JournalTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Occupations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Stroke
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Decision Making
Occupational Therapy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Speech Therapy
Control Groups
Group Psychotherapy
Uncertainty
Japan
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Cost effectiveness
  • Occupational therapy
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Stroke care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Rehabilitation
  • Community and Home Care
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach for subacute stroke patients : Result of a randomized controlled trial. / Nagayama, Hirofumi; Tomori, Kounosuke; Ohno, Kanta; Takahashi, Kayoko; Nagatani, Ryutaro; Izumi, Ryota; Moriwaki, Kensuke; Yamauchi, Keita.

In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2017, p. 337-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagayama, Hirofumi ; Tomori, Kounosuke ; Ohno, Kanta ; Takahashi, Kayoko ; Nagatani, Ryutaro ; Izumi, Ryota ; Moriwaki, Kensuke ; Yamauchi, Keita. / Cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach for subacute stroke patients : Result of a randomized controlled trial. In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 337-344.
@article{349d818edcce4fb6a5df516d3e04daa4,
title = "Cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach for subacute stroke patients: Result of a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background and purpose: The cost effectiveness of occupational therapy for subacute stroke patients is unclear in the extant literature. Consequently, this study determined the cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach using Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for subacute stroke patients compared with an impairment-based approach. Methods: We conducted an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside a pilot randomized controlled trial, with a single blind assessor for participants in 10 subacute rehabilitation units in Japan. The intervention group received occupation-based goal setting using ADOC, with interventions focused on meaningful occupations. The control group received an impairment-based approach focused on restoring capacities. For both groups, occupational-therapy intervention was administered more than five times per week, for over 40 min each time, and they received physical and speech therapy prior to discharge. The main outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total costs. Further, sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the influence of parameter uncertainty on the base case results. Results: The final number of participants was 24 in each of the two groups. In terms of QALYs, the intervention group is significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.001, difference 95{\%} CI: 0.002-0.008) and total costs are not statistically significant. Applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of JPY 5 million/ QALY, the probability of the occupation-based approach using ADOC being cost effective was estimated to be 65.3{\%}. Conclusions: The results show that the occupation-based approach is associated with significantly improved QALYs and has potential cost effectiveness, compared with the impairment-based approach.",
keywords = "Cost effectiveness, Occupational therapy, Randomized controlled trial, Stroke care",
author = "Hirofumi Nagayama and Kounosuke Tomori and Kanta Ohno and Kayoko Takahashi and Ryutaro Nagatani and Ryota Izumi and Kensuke Moriwaki and Keita Yamauchi",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/10749357.2017.1289686",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "337--344",
journal = "Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation",
issn = "1074-9357",
publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach for subacute stroke patients

T2 - Result of a randomized controlled trial

AU - Nagayama, Hirofumi

AU - Tomori, Kounosuke

AU - Ohno, Kanta

AU - Takahashi, Kayoko

AU - Nagatani, Ryutaro

AU - Izumi, Ryota

AU - Moriwaki, Kensuke

AU - Yamauchi, Keita

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background and purpose: The cost effectiveness of occupational therapy for subacute stroke patients is unclear in the extant literature. Consequently, this study determined the cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach using Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for subacute stroke patients compared with an impairment-based approach. Methods: We conducted an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside a pilot randomized controlled trial, with a single blind assessor for participants in 10 subacute rehabilitation units in Japan. The intervention group received occupation-based goal setting using ADOC, with interventions focused on meaningful occupations. The control group received an impairment-based approach focused on restoring capacities. For both groups, occupational-therapy intervention was administered more than five times per week, for over 40 min each time, and they received physical and speech therapy prior to discharge. The main outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total costs. Further, sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the influence of parameter uncertainty on the base case results. Results: The final number of participants was 24 in each of the two groups. In terms of QALYs, the intervention group is significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.001, difference 95% CI: 0.002-0.008) and total costs are not statistically significant. Applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of JPY 5 million/ QALY, the probability of the occupation-based approach using ADOC being cost effective was estimated to be 65.3%. Conclusions: The results show that the occupation-based approach is associated with significantly improved QALYs and has potential cost effectiveness, compared with the impairment-based approach.

AB - Background and purpose: The cost effectiveness of occupational therapy for subacute stroke patients is unclear in the extant literature. Consequently, this study determined the cost effectiveness of the occupation-based approach using Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for subacute stroke patients compared with an impairment-based approach. Methods: We conducted an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside a pilot randomized controlled trial, with a single blind assessor for participants in 10 subacute rehabilitation units in Japan. The intervention group received occupation-based goal setting using ADOC, with interventions focused on meaningful occupations. The control group received an impairment-based approach focused on restoring capacities. For both groups, occupational-therapy intervention was administered more than five times per week, for over 40 min each time, and they received physical and speech therapy prior to discharge. The main outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total costs. Further, sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the influence of parameter uncertainty on the base case results. Results: The final number of participants was 24 in each of the two groups. In terms of QALYs, the intervention group is significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.001, difference 95% CI: 0.002-0.008) and total costs are not statistically significant. Applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of JPY 5 million/ QALY, the probability of the occupation-based approach using ADOC being cost effective was estimated to be 65.3%. Conclusions: The results show that the occupation-based approach is associated with significantly improved QALYs and has potential cost effectiveness, compared with the impairment-based approach.

KW - Cost effectiveness

KW - Occupational therapy

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Stroke care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019922142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019922142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10749357.2017.1289686

DO - 10.1080/10749357.2017.1289686

M3 - Article

C2 - 28198661

AN - SCOPUS:85019922142

VL - 24

SP - 337

EP - 344

JO - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

SN - 1074-9357

IS - 5

ER -