De-commitment to losing strategic action: Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions

Mathew L A Hayward, Katsuhiko Shimizu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use a mental accounting framework to study the conditions in which CEOs de-commit to poorly performing acquisitions and so become more likely to divest them. We test this framework by contrasting the experiences of 68 firms that divested acquisitions with a control sample of 68 firms that did not divest their acquisitions. Consistent with the theory that we use to explain and predict de-commitment, our results suggest that poorly performing acquired units tend to be divested when executives can place them within 'attributional accounts' (i.e., accounts for the cause of the performance that do not incriminate them) and 'comprehensive accounts' (i.e., within the context of overall firm performance).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-557
Number of pages17
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jun
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Divestiture
Strategic action
Firm performance
Mental accounting
Chief executive officer

Keywords

  • Acquisitions and divestitures
  • De-commitment
  • Mental accounts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

De-commitment to losing strategic action : Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions. / Hayward, Mathew L A; Shimizu, Katsuhiko.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 541-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{28d26337d1074e7c933b706bed3bf7c7,
title = "De-commitment to losing strategic action: Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions",
abstract = "We use a mental accounting framework to study the conditions in which CEOs de-commit to poorly performing acquisitions and so become more likely to divest them. We test this framework by contrasting the experiences of 68 firms that divested acquisitions with a control sample of 68 firms that did not divest their acquisitions. Consistent with the theory that we use to explain and predict de-commitment, our results suggest that poorly performing acquired units tend to be divested when executives can place them within 'attributional accounts' (i.e., accounts for the cause of the performance that do not incriminate them) and 'comprehensive accounts' (i.e., within the context of overall firm performance).",
keywords = "Acquisitions and divestitures, De-commitment, Mental accounts",
author = "Hayward, {Mathew L A} and Katsuhiko Shimizu",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/smj.526",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "541--557",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - De-commitment to losing strategic action

T2 - Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions

AU - Hayward, Mathew L A

AU - Shimizu, Katsuhiko

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - We use a mental accounting framework to study the conditions in which CEOs de-commit to poorly performing acquisitions and so become more likely to divest them. We test this framework by contrasting the experiences of 68 firms that divested acquisitions with a control sample of 68 firms that did not divest their acquisitions. Consistent with the theory that we use to explain and predict de-commitment, our results suggest that poorly performing acquired units tend to be divested when executives can place them within 'attributional accounts' (i.e., accounts for the cause of the performance that do not incriminate them) and 'comprehensive accounts' (i.e., within the context of overall firm performance).

AB - We use a mental accounting framework to study the conditions in which CEOs de-commit to poorly performing acquisitions and so become more likely to divest them. We test this framework by contrasting the experiences of 68 firms that divested acquisitions with a control sample of 68 firms that did not divest their acquisitions. Consistent with the theory that we use to explain and predict de-commitment, our results suggest that poorly performing acquired units tend to be divested when executives can place them within 'attributional accounts' (i.e., accounts for the cause of the performance that do not incriminate them) and 'comprehensive accounts' (i.e., within the context of overall firm performance).

KW - Acquisitions and divestitures

KW - De-commitment

KW - Mental accounts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646555157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646555157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.526

DO - 10.1002/smj.526

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33646555157

VL - 27

SP - 541

EP - 557

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 6

ER -