Derivation(S)

Samuel David Epstein, Hisatsugu Kitahara, T. Daniel Seely

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the nature of derivations. Derivation plays a critical role in minimalist inquiry. But what is the nature of syntactic derivation, and specifically of operations? Just how is the form and application of derivational operations determined? And what criteria can be used in formulating the 'right' type of derivation? For the minimalist program, the strong minimalist thesis (SMT) plays a central role in formulating and evaluating derivation. Under SMT, we expect the recursive part of language faculty to be a system that not only satisfies minimal requirements imposed by the interface systems, but does so in accord with principles of efficient computation. Computational efficiency assumes computation, and the computation equipped with Merge goes some great distance in meeting this expectation, both identifying and satisfying the hypothesized third-factor principles (such as binary merger, no-tampering, inclusiveness, minimal search, and phase-based cyclicity).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780191743863, 9780199549368
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Mar 3

Keywords

  • Language faculty
  • Minimalist derivation
  • Minimalist program
  • Strong minimalist thesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Derivation(S)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2011). Derivation(S). In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013