Derivation(S)

Samuel David Epstein, Hisatsugu Kitahara, T. Daniel Seely

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the nature of derivations. Derivation plays a critical role in minimalist inquiry. But what is the nature of syntactic derivation, and specifically of operations? Just how is the form and application of derivational operations determined? And what criteria can be used in formulating the 'right' type of derivation? For the minimalist program, the strong minimalist thesis (SMT) plays a central role in formulating and evaluating derivation. Under SMT, we expect the recursive part of language faculty to be a system that not only satisfies minimal requirements imposed by the interface systems, but does so in accord with principles of efficient computation. Computational efficiency assumes computation, and the computation equipped with Merge goes some great distance in meeting this expectation, both identifying and satisfying the hypothesized third-factor principles (such as binary merger, no-tampering, inclusiveness, minimal search, and phase-based cyclicity).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780191743863, 9780199549368
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Mar 3

Fingerprint

merger
efficiency
language
Syntax
Computational
Mergers
Language Faculty
Inclusiveness
Cyclicity
Minimalist Program

Keywords

  • Language faculty
  • Minimalist derivation
  • Minimalist program
  • Strong minimalist thesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2011). Derivation(S). In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013

Derivation(S). / Epstein, Samuel David; Kitahara, Hisatsugu; Seely, T. Daniel.

The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press, 2011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Epstein, SD, Kitahara, H & Seely, TD 2011, Derivation(S). in The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013
Epstein SD, Kitahara H, Seely TD. Derivation(S). In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013
Epstein, Samuel David ; Kitahara, Hisatsugu ; Seely, T. Daniel. / Derivation(S). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press, 2011.
@inbook{cbcd372c39a74e1192e462ff0b32716b,
title = "Derivation(S)",
abstract = "This article examines the nature of derivations. Derivation plays a critical role in minimalist inquiry. But what is the nature of syntactic derivation, and specifically of operations? Just how is the form and application of derivational operations determined? And what criteria can be used in formulating the 'right' type of derivation? For the minimalist program, the strong minimalist thesis (SMT) plays a central role in formulating and evaluating derivation. Under SMT, we expect the recursive part of language faculty to be a system that not only satisfies minimal requirements imposed by the interface systems, but does so in accord with principles of efficient computation. Computational efficiency assumes computation, and the computation equipped with Merge goes some great distance in meeting this expectation, both identifying and satisfying the hypothesized third-factor principles (such as binary merger, no-tampering, inclusiveness, minimal search, and phase-based cyclicity).",
keywords = "Language faculty, Minimalist derivation, Minimalist program, Strong minimalist thesis",
author = "Epstein, {Samuel David} and Hisatsugu Kitahara and Seely, {T. Daniel}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780191743863",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Derivation(S)

AU - Epstein, Samuel David

AU - Kitahara, Hisatsugu

AU - Seely, T. Daniel

PY - 2011/3/3

Y1 - 2011/3/3

N2 - This article examines the nature of derivations. Derivation plays a critical role in minimalist inquiry. But what is the nature of syntactic derivation, and specifically of operations? Just how is the form and application of derivational operations determined? And what criteria can be used in formulating the 'right' type of derivation? For the minimalist program, the strong minimalist thesis (SMT) plays a central role in formulating and evaluating derivation. Under SMT, we expect the recursive part of language faculty to be a system that not only satisfies minimal requirements imposed by the interface systems, but does so in accord with principles of efficient computation. Computational efficiency assumes computation, and the computation equipped with Merge goes some great distance in meeting this expectation, both identifying and satisfying the hypothesized third-factor principles (such as binary merger, no-tampering, inclusiveness, minimal search, and phase-based cyclicity).

AB - This article examines the nature of derivations. Derivation plays a critical role in minimalist inquiry. But what is the nature of syntactic derivation, and specifically of operations? Just how is the form and application of derivational operations determined? And what criteria can be used in formulating the 'right' type of derivation? For the minimalist program, the strong minimalist thesis (SMT) plays a central role in formulating and evaluating derivation. Under SMT, we expect the recursive part of language faculty to be a system that not only satisfies minimal requirements imposed by the interface systems, but does so in accord with principles of efficient computation. Computational efficiency assumes computation, and the computation equipped with Merge goes some great distance in meeting this expectation, both identifying and satisfying the hypothesized third-factor principles (such as binary merger, no-tampering, inclusiveness, minimal search, and phase-based cyclicity).

KW - Language faculty

KW - Minimalist derivation

KW - Minimalist program

KW - Strong minimalist thesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919765952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919765952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0013

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780191743863

SN - 9780199549368

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -